God
and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness
to Him: Sayanim: Israeli Operatives in the U.S.
Americans know
that something fundamental is amiss. They sense—rightly—that they are
being misled no matter which political party does the leading.
Pollard took from his
office more than one million documents for copying by his Israeli
handler. When those classified materials were transferred to the
Soviets, reportedly in exchange for the emigration of Russian Jews, this
spy operation shifted the entire dynamics of the Cold War.
Sayanim (singular sayan)
are shielded from conventional legal culpability by being told only
enough to perform their narrow role. Though their help may be essential
to the success of an Israeli operation, these volunteers (sayanim
also means helpers) could pass a polygraph test because their
recruiters ensure they remain ignorant of the overall goals of an
operation.
Morris Amitay,
former executive director of the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee, explains how this invisible cadre aids the Israel
lobby in advancing its geopolitical agenda:
Democrat
or Republican is irrelevant; the strategic point remains the same: to
ensure that lawmakers perform consistent with Israel’s interests. With
the help of McCain-Feingold campaign finance “reform,” the Israel lobby
attained virtual control over the U.S. Congress.
Jeff Gates
is a widely acclaimed author, attorney, investment banker, educator and
consultant to government, corporate and union leaders worldwide. He
served for seven years as counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on
Finance. He is widely published in the trade, popular and academic
press. His Website:http://www.criminalstate.com
His latest book is Guilt
by Association: How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War.
His previous books include Democracy
at Risk: Rescuing Main Street From Wall StreetThe
Ownership Solution: Toward a Shared Capitalism for the 21st Century.
The same people who lied about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction to start a war are pushing for war on Iran. MJ Rosenberg Last Modified: 12 Nov 2011 Christmas did not arrive early for the “Bomb Iran” crowd.
Sayanim: Israeli Operatives in the U.S.
Jeff Gates, documents ‘How the
Israel Lobby led the effort to take America to War in Pursuit of Tel
Aviv’s Expansionist Agenda, in his Blockbuster book: Guilt by
Association: How Deception
and Self-Deceit Took America to War.
“This book contains so much amazing detail that it takes a while to absorb it all. The author’s background gives him credibility, and the connections between the political class, organized crime, corporate media and Israeli connections are well researched.”“This explosive tour de force by former Senate Finance Committee counsel Jeff Gates will rattle the bones of Washington’s political establishment as never before. With meticulous analysis, Gates’ non-partisan straight talk presents a fearless and unparalleled expose of rampant deceit, corruption and treason infecting the American body politic for many decades.”“Writing a review simply can not do justice to this book. Read it for yourself and prepare to have the curtain lifted on years of deceit and corruption.”
“By deception, thou shalt make war”- Motto of the Mossad
Israeli Intelligence Agency
Israel is doing all it can to make Iran the
next disastrous ‘war for control’ and the 85% of corrupt US politicians
will vote it in when the time comes as seen in the Press TV report
below. It is ‘support the war or lose your seat’. This is why, I’ve
decided to do a re-run of Jeff Gates’ timely article. Sayanim —
Israeli Operatives in the U.S. in which he best describes why
Israel is successful in the US.
Sayanim — Israeli Operatives in the U.S.
by Jeff Gates

A long misinformed public lacks the tools to
grasp how they are being deceived. Without those tools,
Americans will continue to be frustrated at being played for the fool.
When the “con” is clearly seen, “the mark”
(that’s us) will see that all roads lead to the same duplicitous source:
Israel and its operatives. The secret to Israel’s force-multiplier in
the U.S. is its use of agents,
assets and sayanim
(Hebrew forvolunteers).
When Israeli-American Jonathan Pollard was
arrested for spying in 1986, Tel Aviv assured us that he was not an
Israeli agent but part of a “rogue” operation. That
was a lie.
Only 12 years later did
Tel Aviv concede that he was an Israeli spy the entire time he was
stealing U.S. military secrets. That espionage—by a purported
ally—damaged our national security more than any operation in U.S.
history.
In short, Israel
played us for the fool.
From 1981-1985, this U.S. Navy intelligence
analyst provided Israel with 360 cubic feet of classified military
documents on Soviet arms shipments, Pakistani nuclear weapons, Libyan
air defense systems and other intelligence sought by Tel Aviv to advance
its geopolitical agenda.
Agents differ
from assets and sayanim. Agents possess
the requisite mental state to be convicted of treason, a capital crime.
Under U.S. law, that internal state is what distinguishes premeditated
murder from a lesser crime such as involuntary manslaughter. Though
there’s a death in either case, the legal liabilities are different—for a
reason.
Intent is the factor that
determines personal culpability. That distinction traces its roots to a
widely shared belief in free will as a key component that distinguishes
humans from animals.
Agents operate with
premeditation and “extreme malice” or what the law describes as an “evil
mind.” Though that describes the mental state of Jonathan Pollard,
Israeli leaders assured us otherwise—another example of an evil mind as
the U.S.
was played for the fool.
Played for the Fool, Again

To put a price tag on this espionage,
imagine $20 trillion in U.S. Cold War defense outlays from 1948-1989 (in
2010 dollars). The bulk of that investment in national security was
negated by a spy working for a nation that pretended throughout to be a
U.S. ally.
Pollard was sentenced to
life in prison. Israel suffered no consequences. None. Zero. Nada. Not
then. Not now. Then as now, we were played for the fool.
At trial, Pollard claimed he wasn’t stealing
from the
U.S.; he was stealing secrets for Israel—with whom the U.S. has long had a “special
relationship.” He thought we should have shared our military secrets
with them. That’s chutzpah. That also confirms we were played for the
fool.
Looking back, it’s easy
to see how seamlessly we segued from a global Cold War to a global War
on Terrorism. In retrospect, the false intelligence used to induce our
invasion of Iraq was traceable to Israelis, pro-Israelis or Israeli
assets such as John McCain (see below).
Even while in prison, Pollard’s iconic
status among Israelis played a strategic role. Was it just coincidence
that Tel Aviv announced a $1 million grant to their master spy less than
two weeks before 911? Is that how
Israel signaled its operatives in the U.S.?
Did that grant have any relationship to the “dancing
Israelis” who were found filming and celebrating that mass murder
as both jets smashed into the World
Trade Center?
Absent that provocation, would we now find
ourselves at war in the Middle East? Surely no one still believes that
America’s interests are being advanced in a quagmire that has now become
the longest war in U.S. history.
“I know what America is,” Benjamin Netanyahu
told a group of Israelis in 2001, apparently not knowing his words were
being recorded. “America is a thing you can move very easily, move it
in the right direction.”
Let’s face it: the
U.S. was again played for the fool.
With oversight by Israeli case officers (katsas),
Israeli operations proceed in the U.S. by using agents, assets and
volunteers (sayanim). Let’s take a closer look at each.
The Sayanim System

In other words, a sayan can
operate as an accomplice but still not be legally liable due to a lack
of the requisite intent regarding the broader goals—of which they are purposely
kept ignorant. Does that intentional “ignorance” absolve them of
liability under U.S. law? So far, yes.
Much like military reservists, sayanim
are activated when needed to support an operation. By agreeing to be
available to help Israel, they provide an on-call undercover corps and
force-multiplier that can be deployed on short notice.
How are sayanim called to action? To date, there’s been no
attempt by U.S. officials to clarify that key point. This may explain
why Pollard was again in the news on July 13th with a high-profile Israeli commemoration of his
9000th day of incarceration.
To show solidarity with this
Israeli-American traitor, the lights encircling Jerusalem were darkened
while an appeal was projected onto the walls of the Old City urging that
President Obama order Pollard’s release from federal prison.
Pollard has long been a rallying point for
Jewish nationalists, Zionist extremists and ultra-orthodox ideologues.
In short, just the sort of people who would be likely recruits as sayanim.
The news coverage given this Day of Adoration may help explain how
Israel signals its helpers that an operation is underway and in need of
their help.
Are pro-Israelis once
again playing Americans for the fool?
When not aiding an ongoing operation, sayanim
gather and report intelligence useful to Israel. This volunteer corps is
deeply imbedded in legislative bodies, particularly in the U.S.
Thus far, this Israeli operation has
advanced with legal impunity as the Israel lobby—though acting as a
foreign agent—continues even now to pose as a “domestic” operation.

“There are a lot of guys at the working
level up here [on Capitol Hill]…who happen to be Jewish, who are
willing…to look at certain issues in terms of their Jewishness…These are
all guys who are in a position to make the decision in these areas for
those senators…You can get an awful lot done just at the staff level.”
What sayanim
are not told by their katsas is that an Israeli operation may endanger not
only Israel but also the broader Jewish community when these operations
are linked to extremism, terrorism, organized crime, espionage and
treason. Though sayanim “must be 100 percent Jewish,” Ostrovsky
reports in By
Way of Deception (1990):
“…the Mossad does not seem to care how
devastating it could be to the status of the Jewish people in the
Diaspora if it was known. The answer you get if you ask is: “So what’s
the worst that could happen to those Jews? They’d all come to Israel.
Great!” [Mossad is the intelligence and foreign operations directorate
for Israel.]
Assets,
Agents and Sayanim
Assets are people profiled in sufficient
depth that they can be relied upon to perform consistent with their
profile. Such people typically lack the state of mind required for
criminal culpability because they lack the requisiteintent to
commit a crime.
Nevertheless, assets are
critical to the success of Israeli operations in the U.S. They help
simply by pursuing their profiled personal needs—typically for
recognition, influence, money, sex, drugs or the greatest drug of all:
ideology.
Thus the mission-critical
task fulfilled by political assets that the Israel lobby “produces” for
long-term service in the Congress—while appearing to represent their
U.S. constituents.
Put a profiled asset in a
pre-staged time, place and circumstance—over which the Israel lobby can
exert considerable influence—and Israeli psy-ops specialists can be
confident that, within an acceptable range of probabilities, an asset
will act consistent with his or her profile.

The performance of assets in the political
sphere can be anticipated with sufficient confidence that outcomes
become foreseeable—within an acceptable range of probabilities. How
difficult was it to predict the outcome when Bill Clinton, a classic
asset, encountered White House intern Monica Lewinsky?
Senator John McCain
has long been a predictable asset. His political career traces its
origins to organized crime from the 1920s. It was organized crime that
first drew him to Arizona to run for Congress four years before the 1986
retirement of Senator Barry Goldwater.
By marketing his “brand” as a Vietnam-era
prisoner of war, he became a reliable spokesman for Tel Aviv while being
portrayed as a “war hero.” No media outlet dares mention that Colonel
Ted Guy, McCain’s commanding officer while a POW, sought his indictment
for treason for his many broadcasts for the North Vietnamese that
assured the death of many U.S. airmen.
As a typical asset, it came as no surprise
to see McCain and Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman, a self-professed
Zionist, used to market the phony intelligence that took us to war in
Iraq. McCain’s ongoing alliance with transnational organized crime spans
three decades.
His 1980’s advocacy for
S&L crook Charles Keating of “The Keating 5” finds a counterpart in
his recent meetings with Russian-Israeli mobster Oleg Deripaska who at
age 40 held $40 billion in wealth defrauded from his fellow Russians.
McCain conceded earlier this month in a town
hall meeting in Tempe, Arizona that he met in a small dinner in
Switzerland with mega-thief Deripaska and Lord Rothschild V.
For assets such as McCain to be indicted for
treason, the American public must grasp the critical role that such
pliable personalities play in political manipulations. McCain is a
“poster boy” for how assets are deployed to shape decisions
such as those that took our military to war. In the Information Age, if
that’s not treason, what is?
The predictability of a politician’s conduct
confirms his or her qualifications as an asset. They are routinely
developed and “produced” over lengthy periods of time and then—as with
John McCain—maintained in key positions to influence decision-making as
key junctures.
Israeli Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon was candid in his assessment four weeks after 911. He may
have been thinking about John McCain when he made this revealing
comment:
“I want to tell you
something very clear, don’t worry about American pressure on Israel, we,
the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it.” [October
3, 2001]
Indictments
for Treason
Are assets culpable? Do
they have the requisite intent to indict them for treason? Does John
McCain possess an evil mind? Did he betray this nation of his own free
will or is he typical of those assets with personalities so weak and
malleable that they can easily be manipulated?
As federal grand juries are impaneled to
identify and indict participants in this trans-generational operation,
how many sayanim should the Federal Bureau of Investigation
expect to uncover in the U.S.? No one knows because this subtle form of
treason is not yet well understood.
Victor Ostrovksy, a former Mossad katsa
(case officer) wrote in 1990 that the Mossad had 7,000 sayanim
in London alone. In London’s 1990 population of 6.8 million, Israel’s
all-volunteer corps represented one-tenth of one percent of the
residents of that capital city.
If Washington, DC is ten times more critical
to Israel’s geopolitical goals (an understatement), does that mean the
FBI should expect to find ten times moresayanim
per capita in Washington?
What about sayanim in
Manhattan, Miami, Beverly Hills, Atlanta, Boston, Charleston,
Charlotte, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, Denver, Detroit, Houston, Kansas
City, Minneapolis, New Orleans, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Portland,
Sacramento, San Diego, Seattle, St. Louis, Tampa, Toledo?
No one knows. And Tel Aviv is unlikely to
volunteer the information. This we know for certain: America has been
played for the fool. And so has our military.
This duplicity dates back well before
British Foreign Secretary Alfred Balfour wrote to an earlier Lord
Rothschild in 1917 citing UK approval for a “Jewish homeland.” In
practical effect, that “homeland” now ensures non-extradition for senior
operatives in transnational organized crime.
To date, America has blinded itself even to
the possibility of such a trans-generational
operation inside our borders and imbedded inside our
government. Instead the toxic charge of “anti-Semitism”
is routinely hurled at those chronicling the “how” component of
this systemic treason.
Making this treason transparent is essential
to restore U.S. national security. That transparency may initially
appear unfair to the many moderate and secular Jews who join others
appalled at this systemic corruption of the U.S. political system.
Yet they are also concerned that somehow
they may be portrayed as guilty by
association due to a shared faith tradition. That would be not
only unjust to them but also ineffective in identifying and indicting
those complicit.
This much is certain: a
Democrat as president offers no real alternative to a
Republican on those issues affecting U.S. policy in the Middle East.
Today’s corruption predates the
duplicity in 1948 that induced Harry Truman to extend recognition
to this extremist enclave as a legitimate
nation state. Our troubles date from then.
That fateful decision must be revisited in
light of what can now be proven about the
“how” of this ongoing duplicity—unless Americans want to
continue to be played for the fool.

Iran: US confesses to Covert Ops
The Iraq liars target Iran
The same people who lied about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction to start a war are pushing for war on Iran. MJ Rosenberg Last Modified: 12 Nov 2011 Christmas did not arrive early for the “Bomb Iran” crowd.
Over the past several weeks, neoconservative
hawks were gleefully predicting that the International Atomic Energy
Agency’s new report on Iran’s nuclear program would provide the spark
needed to ignite and justify a US or Israeli attack.
Sadly for them, the report did no such thing
and the issue has been overshadowed by other stories. In fact, there
was so little new in the IAEA report that Iran experts who had been
scheduled to do media spots discussing the issue were told not to bother
coming in. The Penn State cover-up, the Herman Cain sexual harassment
scandal, and now the Rick Perry brain freeze would continue to dominate
the news cycle.
This does not mean that
the Iran nuclear threat has passed, only that the IAEA did not
demonstrate that it has intensified. Yes, Iran is taking steps that
indicate clear interest in developing nuclear weapons. But neither the
IAEA nor anyone else knows if the Iranian regime intends to develop
weapons, how long it will take to develop them or what its nuclear
posture would be if it had the bomb. For 30 years, various experts have
predicted that Iran would have nuclear weapons in a year, five years, or
whenever – with the date always receding into the horizon.
The IAEA report doesn’t offer much
clarification. As a senior US government official said, in a conference
call with reporters: “The IAEA does not assert that Iran has resumed a
full scale nuclear weapons program nor does it have a program about how
advanced the programs really are.”
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/11/2011111113135678844.html
……………………………………………….
From: Press TV
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/11/2011111113135678844.html
……………………………………………….
From: Press TV
US confesses
to covert ops against Iran
(Sun Nov 13, 2011 3:41PM GMT) –
Washington is seeking to stop Iran’s nuclear program by means of maximum
covert operations including the assassination of Iranian scientists.
Speaking at the Republican presidential
debate in Spartanburg, South Carolina, on Saturday former Republican
Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich openly advocated increased covert
terrorism against Iran.
He suggested employing “maximum covert
operations to block and disrupt the Iranian program including taking out
their scientists, including breaking up their systems. All of it
covertly, all of it deniable.”
Gingrich advocated “actively funding every
dissident group in Iran.”
US confesses to covert
ops against Iran
……………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………….
US new propaganda campaign against Iran
Tehran, Oct 11, IRNA, — Islamic Republic
News Agency was informed a few minutes ago by a source in the United
States that the US Government is launching a new propaganda campaign
against the Islamic Republic of Iran.
US new propaganda campaign against Iran
The campaign is focused on a story in which
an Iranian named Mansour Arbab Sayyar planned to attack embassies of
Saudi Arabia and the Zionist regime in Washington.
The story quotes American officials saying
that Arbab Sayyar, 56, received orders from the Government in Tehran.
The American officials have also claimed that Arbab Sayyar, in a meeting with a US secret police agent in July this year, offered him money in return for the terrorist attack.
The American officials have also claimed that Arbab Sayyar, in a meeting with a US secret police agent in July this year, offered him money in return for the terrorist attack.
The source told IRNA that US Government is
to release a statement on this issue.
1771**1771
US new
propaganda campaign against Iran
……………………………………………………………………..
GOP candidates want US attack on Iran
……………………………………………………………………..
GOP candidates want US attack on Iran
The debate was filled with bombastic war
rhetoric against Iran, except for Ron Paul who drew parallels with the
misguided calls in 2003 for war with Iraq Republican presidential
candidates were bombastic in Saturday night’s debate on the issue of
Iran in light of the most recent U.N. nuclear watch-dog report on the
country’s nuclear weapons program.
Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney
railed against Obama for being weak on Iran. “If we reelect Barack
Obama,” he claimed, “Iran will have a nuclear weapon.”
When asked whether he would choose to strike
Iran militarily, Romney said “absolutely,” so long as aggressive
sanctions and covert war failed to end their nuclear enrichment.
Short URL:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=174157
No comments:
Post a Comment