| 
 
 
 
 
 In this work of subversion, Freemasonry undertakes three tasks which represents three successive steps towards the final objective.
 
 The first step is the work inside the lodges.  Freemasonry gradually steeps its initiates in Masonic principles and  ideas. It is a more subtle equivalent of Communist brainwashing techniques. The brethren formed in this way comprise groups active outside the lodges. Secondly is the work of propaganda in the  outside world. Freemasonry has perfected a very effective technique of  occult propaganda in the world at large, which consists in spreading and  imposing Masonic ideals outside the lodges, without revealing the  secret source from which these currents originate. As one of the  speakers at the 1922 Convent of the Grand Orient expressed it, "Masonry should be felt everywhere, but nowhere should its face be unveiled". It consists in spreading belief in the natural, inevitable and irresistible evolution of human progress.
 
 The third step towards the final objective is in  the field of political activity. The ideological propaganda, as  described above, runs parallel with the political conspiracy, whose object is to seize power and place Freemasons in positions of command. As far as possible, the public is not to know that they are Masons.
 
 All this vast field of activity is protected by two secrets: the esoteric secret inside the Masonic lodges; and the secret political action outside the lodges.
 
 Let us now pass on to study the nature of the esoteric secret. In the first stage, new  members are attracted by Freemasonry's generous and humanitarian  professions of faith, and also by promises of influence and concealed  assistance.
 
 Candidates are carefully chosen and thoroughly vetted  long before they are even approached. When they are received into the  lodge, they are made to take an oath of secrecy, which is renewed every time they advance to a higher degree.  At this point commences the second stage in the candidate's formation;  as soon as he has become a Mason, a process of doctrinal formation (or  brainwashing) begins, which will continue all his life.
 
 The statements of principle are cleverly worded in vague, generous, humanitarian terms which can be interpreted in many very different ways.  Cautiously, and by easy stages, a neophyte learns that these terms have  a hidden meaning, a higher meaning, which he will not understand until  he has undergone further initiation. In this way, he learns, one by one,  of a succession of hidden meanings, which he is told are an  ascent towards the Light, and in which he gradually becomes steeped.  This is the purpose of the succession of different degrees; if the Mason  is receptive, he climbs upward in the Masonic hierarchy, and yet he  never at any time knows exactly where he stands in it, nor how many  higher degrees or persons control the organisation. As in the secret  Communist organisation, one is never very sure whether the titular degrees correspond to the real seat of power.  Freemasonry is therefore in a sense a succession of secret societies superimposed on one another,  whose mode of operation has been slowly laid bare, at least in broad  outline, by a series of patient investigators; nevertheless, it remains  unknown to the public at large and, all in all, continues to be very  effective.
 
 To justify the above statements, here are a few Masonic  texts emanating from highly-placed dignitaries in the Order, who  themselves admit to being initiates at a high level.
 
 Thus, there is a secret theology in Freemasonry, to use the trenchant expression of Rabbi Benamozegh, in his book Israel et l'Humanité,  and in this context he is in full agreement with the Masonic writers  from whom we have just quoted, whether French, like Oswald Wirth,  English, like Wilmshurst, or American, like Albert Pike; whether  "regular" or "irregular", to use Mr. Mellor's terms."The Blue Degrees", wrote Albert Pike, "are but the outer court or portico of the Temple. Part of the symbols are displayed there to the Initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not intended that he shall understand them; but it is intended that he shall imagine he understands them. Their true explanation is reserved for the Adepts, the Princes of Masonry.  The whole body of the Royal and Sacerdotal Art was hidden so carefully,  centuries since, in the High Degrees, as that it is even yet impossible  to solve many of the enigmas which they contain. It is well enough for  the mass of those called Masons, to imagine that all is contained in the  Blue Degrees; and whoso attempts to undeceive them will labour in vain,  and without any true reward violate his obligations as an Adept.  Masonry is the veritable Sphinx, buried to the head in the sands heaped  round it by the ages." (A. Pike: Morals and Dogma, p. 819)  The well-known English Mason, Wilmshurst, says the same thing:  
 
"The method in question (of Freemasonry) is that of  initiation; the usage and practice is that of allegory and symbol,  which it is the Freemason's duty, if he wishes to understand his system,  to labour to interpret and to put to personal interpretation. If he  fails to do so, he still remains—and the system deliberately intends that he should—in the dark about the Order's real meaning and secrets, although formerly a member of it."     (W. L. Wilmshurst : The Masonic Initiation, 1957, PP- 4-5)  And further on he says:  "We profess to confer initiation, but few Masons know what real initiation involves; very  few, one fears, would have the wish, the courage, or the willingness to  make the necessary sacrifices to attain it if they did."     ( W. L. Wilmshurst, ibid., p. 17)  For his part, Brother Oswald Wirth, so praised by Mellor, tells us:  
 
"When Freemasonry, or for that matter any other  confraternity based on initiation, prides itself on its impenetrable  veil of secrecy, it is not a case of the transferable but of the  intelligible content of the mysteries. One can divulge only the dead  letter, not the spirit, which of its own accord reveals itself to those  who are privileged to understand.  
 
"It is a serious matter to ask for Initiation, for one has to  sign a pact. Agreed, there is no external, formal, visible signature; it  cannot be compared with signing one's name in blood, for being purely  moral and immaterial, it demands that the man's soul be truly committed in the act.  It is not, then, like driving a bargain with the Devil, in which the  Evil One allows himself to be tricked; it is an agreement entered into  seriously on both sides, and there is no escape from its clauses. The Initiates in fact contract into certain duties towards the pupil thus admitted to their school, yet the pupil himself is by that very fact indissolubly bound to his masters. . . .  
 
"Note that the guides are never seen and do not thrust themselves forward. . ..  "At the basis of any real initiation there are certain duties contracted. Beware then of knocking at the door of the Temple if you are not resolved to become a new man. . . .
 
 
"It would all be nothing more than a snare and a delusion, if you could ask to be initiated free of all obligation, without paying with your very soul  for your entry into brotherly communion with the builders of this great  humanitarian edifice, whose design has been traced by the Great  Architect of the Universe. . . ."      
 
(O. Wirth: L'Idéal Initiatique, pp. 10-11)    
 Then comes the second stage in the activities of Masonry—secret activity outside the lodges—which consists in spreading and implanting throughout the world the philosophical ideas of Freemasonry tinder a general cover of humanitarianism.  This work is accomplished by secret infiltration and  the undercover circulation of ideas, by means of a technique admirably  described for us by the Freemason Regis, when speaking at the Convent of  the Grand Orient in 1928:
 
 Finally, we come to the third stage in the work of Masonry, that of its direct intervention in politics."Under the Grand Orient's influence, and in the calm and  silence of our Temples, we should study all the most important questions  affecting the life of communities, of the Nation, and of Humanity at  large. Our Brethren will be thoroughly well-informed; they will leave  the Temple well-instructed, fully equipped for the struggle ahead. They will leave behind them their aprons and their outward insignia of Masonry;  they will go down into the city just as ordinary citizens, but each one  will be thoroughly steeped in our outlook, and each, in his own profane  circle, in his party or his union, will act according to his  conscience—yet, I repeat, he will be saturated in the teaching he has received.  "Rich will be the result—not because it is occult, but because the influence of Masonry will gradually seep in everywhere;  to the bewilderment of the profane world, the same spirit and the same  unity of action will force their way to the front, and, as in a well  constructed syllogism, a certain conclusion bearing fateful consequences  will gradually emerge and impose itself on its profane environment.
"Over and above all our other loyalties, a power we cannot deny governs us; that power is the spiritual power called Freemasonry.
"And why not follow these proud thoughts to their logical  conclusion? Because we know more, because we have worked along sounder  lines, than the mass of those who belong to profane groups, it is almost inevitable that we should take over their leadership.  Let us not hide our light under a bushel; to a large extent it has  already happened, and thus many profane bodies are without question  receiving an infusion of our warm, living blood. I am perfectly well  aware that we do, discreetly, form the elite in all the big social and political parties, and that thus we are sure of being able to control their policy. It is our duty-I repeat, our duty-to make sure that we control the politicians who are elected,  that we right their wrongs, and show them their mistakes, and reproach  them for what they have failed to do. In a word, Freemasonry should be  the `politician's conscience'."
 
 
(Brother Regis, Convent of the Grand Orient 1928, p. 256)    
 This is how Leo XIII described it in his Encyclical of 19th March, 1902:
 
 It is instructive, in this context, to compare the  conclusion of the famous Pope with the following passages from the  equally renowned Freemason, Oswald Wirth:"Freemasonry is the permanent personification of the Revolution; it constitutes a sort of society in reverse whose aim is to exercise an occult overlordship upon society as we know it, and whose sole raison d'étre consists in waging war against God and His Church." (Encyclical: On the 25th Year of Our Pontificate)
 
 "The cause of Freemasonry became identified with the cause of the  Republic, and if electoral campaigns sometimes did absorb too much time  in the affairs of the lodges, the reason is that all friends of  progress, seeking to strike a final blow at clericals and reactionaries,  rallied together under the banner of Masonry."     (O. Wirth : Le Livre de l'Apprenti, p. 80)  Freemasonry has played a leading part in international politics, and especially in all the revolutionary movements  which have shaken Europe and the world since 1789: in 1830, 1848, and  1871 in France; in 1848 and 1917 elsewhere in Europe, to mention only  the most important instances. Freemasonry boasts of having been both the  inspiration and the secret ruler of the Third Republic in France (1870-1939), and it  is Freemasonry which has always been in the vanguard of the struggle  against the Catholic Church in France, Italy, Spain, Portugal and  Austria—or, in a word, wherever the Church was the religion of the  country. We do not propose to re-write that history here, nor  even to summarise Freemasonry's political activities; we only mention  it to remind the reader that this is a factor which must be taken into  account. (For a complete study of this question, see Leon de Poncins : The Secret Powers behind Revolution.)"If at these moments of civil distress, the lodges had  limited themselves to what we may call their normal peacetime  occupation, they would have failed in their most sacred duty, for they  would have been refusing to defend that heritage of liberties conquered  by our valiant ancestors. It is to their honour that they have broken  their rule, launching themselves with all haste into the political  arena. They formed themselves into electoral committees to save the  Republic, forgetful for the moment of that lofty humanitarian philosophy  whose cultivation is the basic aim of Freemasonry."     (O. Wirth : L'Idéal Initiatique, p. 82)
 But one point which we must emphasise in this context is the secrecy surrounding all these activities.
 Freemasonry is practically never mentioned in the  Press; history books are silent about the power and influence of the  Order, and governments and parliaments never dare debate such a  dangerous subject. Reports of Masonic meetings and Congresses are not  available to the public; Masonic magazines and publications are not  placed in the Bibliothéque Nationale or the British Museum, although the  law of the land demands it.
 In general, we can say that Freemasonry has succeeded  in keeping its political activities secret. But no secret can be kept  indefinitely, and it is nearly always possible to discover the Masonic  origins of such and such a political decision—only by that time it is  usually too late to hinder it. We have chosen the following examples  from history to illustrate this point:  The peace treaty of 1918 was directly inspired by Masonry. Its  clauses had been worked out at a great international Masonic conference  which took place on 28th, 29th and 30th June, 1917, at the headquarters  of the Grand Orient of France in the Rue Cadet, Paris. This  conference was attended by representatives of the leading lodges of  allied and neutral countries—Italy, Switzerland, Belgium, Serbia, Spain,  Portugal, Argentina, Brazil, the United States (whence two lodges in  Arkansas and Ohio, unrepresented, sent cordial greetings) and so on;  only the Grand Lodge of England was unrepresented. In 1936 the complete  minutes of this meeting came to light and were published in their  entirety, accompanied by a detailed commentary, in Leon de Poncin's : La Société des Nations-Super—Etat Mgonnique, from which all the information and documents in the following paragraphs have been taken.
 Preparations for the Congress in June were put in hand  at an earlier one in January 1917, as the minutes of the subsequent  meeting relate:
 
 "In sending you the summary of minutes of the Conference of the  Masonic Jurisdictions of the Allied Nations, which was held at Paris on  14th and 15th January, 1917, as well as the resolutions and the  manifesto therein adopted, it is our privilege to inform you that this  Congress decided to hold a Masonic Congress at the Grand Orient of  France, in Paris, on 28th, 29th and 30th of June next.  "The object of this Congress will be to investigate the means of elaborating the Constitution of the League of Nations,  so as to prevent the recurrence of a catastrophe similar to the one at  present raging which has plunged the civilised world in mourning.
"It was the opinion of this conference that this  programme cannot be discussed solely by the Freemasonry of the Allied  Nations, and that it is a matter also for the Masonic bodies of the  neutral nations to bring what light they can to the discussion of so  grave a problem. . . .
"It is the duty of Freemasonry at the close of the cruel  drama now being played out, to make its great and humanitarian voice  heard, and to guide the nations towards a general organisation which  will become their safeguard. It would be wanting in its duty, and false  to its great principles, were it to remain silent. . . .
"It is clearly understood that the Masonic Congress will  confine itself entirely to the humanitarian field, and that, in  conformity with our Masonic Constitutions, it will not touch on any  question of a political nature.
"We would be very grateful to receive from you the assurance of your support with the least possible delay. . . ."                                 (Leon de Poncins; La Société des Nations, pp. 65-67)
 |