The Justice of God: Williamson is an Apostate Freemason who is a Satanic decoy for the Satanic Apostate Vatican and the Satanic Apostate SSPX

The Justice of God: Williamson is an Apostate Freemason who is a Satanic decoy for the Satanic Apostate Vatican and the Satanic Apostate SSPX

See: The Justice of God: Destruction of Babylon and all that are part of her.

There was a time when much of the SSPX represented real resistance to the Great Apostasy of Vatican II. That is entirely gone now.

Several points are absolutely important here.

1) The Marian apparitions are totally false and from the Devil.

Marian Apparitions are False

Marian Apparitions are False

2) There is no Chastisement. That is strictly a Diabolic false substitute for the Second Coming of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ invented by the false apparitions. Don't fall for that!

3) So-Called Bishop Fellay (a Satanic Rosecrucian) and s

o-called Bishop Williamson and all of the SSPX connected in any way to either or both of them are all just another arm of the absolutely totally apostate Vatican II Great Apostasy. The Fatal weakness of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre

 is manifesting itself completely 

(see below and the links there: 

The Justice of God: The Apocalypse, the Book of the Revelation: 18. - The Complete Apostasy and fall into absolute Satanic decadence and Fall of Rome-the Vatican…. Father Lauriers rightfully condemns Msgr. Lefebvre's retreat from the truth.

). Don't have anything to do with any of it or them.

4) Traditio (see below Traditio - June 12, 2013) knows better than to support Williamson and his Rosecrucian decoy maneuvers (see below: "Bishop" Williamson, Rosicrucian Freemason decoy) including especially the blasphemy of the Valtorta nonsense. It is not surprising though that they do since they also promote the absolute heresy claiming the Mark of the Beast is past, which it is not - it is future. In doing this they set people up to take the Mark of the Beast and be damned.

5) This garbage of Valtorta is absolutely plain and simple: the substitution of the naturalistic man-god which is the Antichrist instead of the True God-man which is Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. His nature as God always precedes the human nature He subsumed in His Incarnation by the Holy Spirit and the blessed virgin Mary. He united by His nature as God His human nature from the virgin to His nature as God. The True Catholic Church's absolute insistence  on always naming Him the God-man is for this reason. To reverse the order is to name the simia-Christi or ape of Christ, the Antichrist instead. Everything that the blasphemous heretic Valtorta spews forth is evidence of this complete reversal of Truth. It is the most vile denial of Christ and attempt to bring in the Antichrist in Our Lord Jesus Christ's place. HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH IT UPON PAIN OF DAMNATION. Williamson's foisting of this upon especially children brands him as another Vaticanista child murdering pederast Satan worshipper and follower of the Antichrist.

Book review ofValtorta’s Poem of the Man-God by Marian T. Horvat, Ph.D.

Valtorta’s Poem of the Man-God 

Marian T. Horvat, Ph.D.

Book review of Peom of the Man-God by Maria Valtorta, 10 volumes, online edition

A friend recently sent me an e-mail asking about Maria Valtorta and her Poem of the Man-God. She received a recent issue ofKyrie Eleison comments of Bishop Richard Williamson titled “Home Reading” (October 20, 2012). In it, he recommends parents read selected chapters of the Poem of the Man-God to children every night. He admits the Poem is controversial and has many enemies, but he defends Valtorta’s massive tome (4,000 pages in 10 volumes of supposed visions she received of the life of Christ). The Bishop supports it, despite the objections he lists: that it is riddled with doctrinal errors, that it humanizes Our Lord Jesus Christ, and that the work was placed on the Church’s Index of Forbidden Books in the 1950s. He lightly dismisses all the arguments against it and concludes children will learn much about Our Lord and Our Lady from the Poem, which “will fortify a home.” “I have not read this book,” my friend continues, “but, for Heaven’s sake, why didn’t Bishop W. recommend reading the wonderful, approved, written-by-a-canonized saint 4-volume City of God by Mother Mary of Agreda? But that is beside the point. I really do wish to know if you approve of the Poem of the Man-God. Even the title upsets my Catholic sensibilities.” A humanized Christ I believe my friend should follow her good Catholic sense. The very title, the Man-God , expresses the spirit of the work. It is Jesus as a man that Valtorta presents: a babe suckling greedily at his Mother’s breasts, a youth hardly aware of Who He is, a Man who laughs and jokes with His Apostles and is constantly kissing them on the mouth and embracing them closely. Yes, at the least, it is difficult not to suspect this showy Jesus pictured in such way as having homosexual tendencies. Valtorta’s natural approach is supposed to attract the modern man to the Life of Christ. It is in tune with the progressivist doctrine that tries to deny the supernatural and instead presents Our Lady as a simple Jewish woman and focuses on Our Lord as being a man “like us.” As Atila Guimaraes points out in Animus Injuriandi I, the progressivist Church aims to de-mythify and de-supernaturalize Christ and His Mother under the guise of presenting a natural “historical” Christ and Mary.” I believe Valtorta’s Jesus and Mary fit this mold.

An illustration of Valtorta's Jesus, a somewhat occult figure with a magnetic gaze

Valtorta’s Man-God depiction is the opposite of the God-Man portrayed by Anne Catherine Emmerich and Ven. Mary of Agreda, whose life of Christ is presented from an elevated, supernatural vantage point. One cannot help but wonder why the traditionalist Bishop would not recommend these works, instead of the Valtorta tomes, which were officially condemned by the Holy Office and placed on the Index in December 1959 and defined by L’Osservatore Romano of January 6,1960 as “a badly fictionalized life of Jesus.” After Vatican II, Paul VI abolished the Index of Forbidden Books, and Valtorta’s supporters claim this nullifies the suppression of 1959. Unfortunately, the official position of the Church today is less than clear, with important Prelates and Catholic figures on both sides of the issue. Obviously, the progressivists, almost to the man, defend it. The Poem of the Man-God, I believe, is riddled with banalities, vulgarities, blasphemies and even doctrinal errors. There are endless idle conversations between Our Lord, Our Lady and the Apostles, all on a natural level. I think the best way to confirm these points is simply to cite some texts, which are so revolting that they speak for themselves. The quotes that follow are taken from an online edition of The Poem of the Man-God. A 48-page critique written in the 1980s – when the Poem’s popularity surged for a period, as it seems to be resurging now – by a Salesian, Brother James, S.D.B., can be read in its entirety here. An Infant conceived with original sin Valtorta portrays the Christ Child as a greedy infant of a sentimental Mother. It is difficult to find the respect we owe to Our Lord Jesus Christ in this imaginary immodest description of a nursing scene:

The Man-God presents a naturalistic view of Our Lady and the Christ Child

“Jesus opens His eyes, sees His Mother and smiles and stretches His little hands toward Her breast. “[Mary] ‘Yes, love of Your Mummy. Yes. Your milk. Before the usual time. But You are always ready to suck Your Mummy's breast, My little holy Lamb!’ “Jesus laughs and plays, kicking His feet out of the blankets, moving His arms happily in a typical childish style, so beautiful to see. He pushes His feet against His Mummy's stomach. He arches His back leaning His fair head on Her breast, and then throws Himself back and laughs, holding with His hands the laces that tie Mary's dress to Her neck, endeavoring to open it. … “Mary nurses Him and Jesus avidly sucks His Mother's good milk, and when He feels that only a little is coming from Her right breast, He looks for the left one, laughing while doing so and looking up at His Mother. Then He falls asleep again on Her breast, His rosy round little cheek resting against Her white round breast.” (Vol 1, n. 35, p. 106). An Adult with homosexual tendencies Valtorta’s Jesus suspiciously displays homosexual tendencies since he is constantly kissing and embracing the Apostles. When Jesus tells James of His approaching Passion, James reacts with great emotion. Jesus comforts him thus: “’Come, I will kiss you thus, to help you forget the burden of My fate as Man. Here, I kiss your lips that will have to repeat My words to the people of Israel and your heart that will have to love as I told you, and there, on your temple, where life will cease.’ … They remain embraced for a long time and James seems to doze off in the joy of God's kisses that make him forget his suffering.”

Recently beatified Gabriel Allegra, a Teilhard de Chardin colleague, was a promoter of the Man-God Poem

When Valtorta describes the “favorite” Apostle John as having the face of a young girl with the “gaze of a lover,” we can hardly avoid having the impression that they have a homosexual relationship. Here Jesus is kissing John to awaken him: “Jesus bends and kisses the cheek of John, who opens his eyes and is dumbfounded at seeing Jesus. He sits up and says, ‘Do you need me? Here I am.’ … “John, half naked in his under-tunic, because he used his tunic and mantle as bed covers, clasps Jesus’ neck and lays his head between Jesus’ shoulder and cheek.” After John professes his belief and love in Jesus as Son of God, “he smiles and weeps, panting, inflamed by his love, relaxing on Jesus’ chest, as if he were exhausted by his ardor. And Jesus caresses him, burning with love Himself.” John begs Jesus not to tell the others of what has passed between them. Jesus replies, “Do not worry, John. No one will be aware of your wedding with the Love. Get dressed, come. We must leave.” (Vol. 2, n. 165, pp. 57-58) Jesus suggests a love-affair between St. Peter and Our Lady Jesus even jokes with impropriety with his apostles. Here, Jesus stands up and calls out loudly and angrily to Peter: “‘Come here, you usurper and corrupter!’ “‘Me? Why? What have I done, Lord?’ “‘You have corrupted My Mother. That is why you wanted to be alone. What shall I do with you?’ “Jesus smiles and Peter recovers his confidence. ‘You really frightened me! Now You are laughing.” (Vol. II, n. 199, p. 185) Like Luther, Mary thinks: Let us sin to be forgiven Some passages are tantamount to heresy. For example, Valtorta presents the child Mary as expressing her desire to be a big sinner in order to merit the grace of Redemption: “[Mary]: ‘Tell Me, mummy, can one be a sinner out of love of God? “[Anne]: ‘What are you saying, my dear? I don't understand you.’ “[Mary]:’I mean: to commit a sin in order to be loved by God, Who becomes the Savior. Who is lost, is saved. Isn’t that so? I would like to be saved by the Savior to receive His loving look." (Vol. 1, n. 7, p. 23). A sensual Eve tending toward bestiality The work is also not without doctrinal errors, such as when Valtorta asserts the sin of Eve was not disobedience, but a sexual act. There is also an insinuation of a tendency toward bestiality in Eve. This erotic description was supposedly made by Jesus: “With his venomous tongue Satan blandished and caressed Eve’s limbs and eyes… Her flesh was aroused … The sensation is a sweet one for her. And ‘she understood.’ Now Malice was inside her and was gnawing at her intestines. She saw with new eyes and heard with new ears the habits and voices of beasts. And she craved for them with insane greed. “She began the sin by herself. She accomplished it with her companion.” (Vol. 1, n. 17, p. 49) These are some excerpts I offer to my readers to evaluate Valtorta’s work. I believe they are sufficient for the reader to make a judgment of the whole. It is thus understandable that the Holy Office placed the work on the Index of Forbidden Books, which is reproduced below. It is also understandable that the Salesian Brother James concluded his critique of the first two volumes with these words: “Poem of the Man-God is so demonic that without a special grace from Our Lord Jesus, we could be deceived by the seemingly harmless statements by Valtorta’s Jesus, but they enclose lies and heresy, contrary to the teachings of One, Holy Catholic Church.” * Supreme Congregation of the Holy Office Decree Proscription of Books Wednesday, December 16, 1959 The Most Eminent and Reverend Cardinals of the Supreme Congregation of the Holy Office, to whom the safeguarding of things of the Faith and Moral is confided, after receiving the previous opinions of the Consultors, have unanimously condemned and ordered that the books by an anonymous author, in four volumes, be inscribed in the Index of Forbidden Books, the first of those books being: Il Poema di Gesù [The Poem of Jesus] (Tipografia Editrice M. Pisani); followed by, Il Poema dell'Uomo-Dio [The Poem of the Man-God], (Ibidem). On Friday of that same month and year, the Most Holy and Dignified Lord John XXIII, Pope by the grace of  Divine Providence, in an audience given to the Most Eminent and Reverend Cardinal Secretary of the Holy Office, after hearing the report of the Most Reverend Fathers, approved this resolution and commanded that it be published. Given in Rome, in the seat of the Holy Office on January 5, 1960. Sebastian Masala, Notary Posted October 29, 2012

___________________________________________________________

This is what is at Malta that Traditio and Williamson aren't telling you about - Rosecrucian Satanism, and all who follow it are damned forever. 

Not only is it present at that organization but wherever the Rosecrucian Williamson goes it is present.

LECTORIUM ROSICRUCIANUM
… the International School of the Golden Rosycross, Malta.

The Lectorium Rosicrucianum is a modern gnostic organization in the tradition of mystery schools, directing the true seeker towards the original, divine order.

See: Rosecrucian Golden Dawn Rothschild London Temple

TRADITIO Traditional Roman Catholic Network, including the Official Catholic Directory of Traditional Latin Masses

June 12, 2013 - St. John of Facundo, Confessor
Double Feast

Independent Bishop Williamson Plans to Conduct His Second European Episcopal Visitation
Five Major Countries Are on His Itinerary to Win over Traditional Catholics from Fellay's Neo-SSPX

From: The TRADITIO Fathers

Independent Traditional Bishop Williamson Has Schedule a Second European Episcopal Visitation
He Will Visit Five Countries to Tell Them that Bernie Fellay's Neo-SSPX
"Is Little Short of Horrible"
He Will Inform These Countries of a New Option, the SSPX of the Strict Observance
An Organization Founded on Archbishop Lefebvre's Original Traditional Catholic Principles

Independent traditional Catholic bishop Richard Williamson, formerly the senior bishop of the SSPX, has announced his second episcopal visitation to Europe to explain to traditional Catholics there why Bernie Fellay's Neo-SSPX must no longer be supported and to inform traditional Catholics of a new option, the Society of St. Pius X of the Strict Observance, which has been founded upon Archbishop Lefebvre's original traditional Catholic principles. In his weekly Bulletin, of June 8, 2013, Bishop Williamson wrote: "The fall of the Society of St. Pius X from what it was under Archbishop Lefebvre between 1970 and 1991 to what it has become over the last, say, 15 years, is little short of horrible."The visitation will take place in the July/August 2013 timeframe. The countries so far on his itinerary are France, Belgium, Italy, Spain, and Malta.

Malta is a particularly interesting venue for a visitation. Malta had supported Benedict-Ratzinger, the Second Paedophile Newpope, who visited there in April 2010 when Ireland and several other major European countries turned down his request to visit because of his complicity in the paedophile crimes of his presbyters and Newbishops. He also caused a bit of a scandal there when he fell asleep in his Newpapal throne during his Novus Ordo Mess. His assistants had to poke him visibly in the ribs to get him back to earth.

Bishop Williamson's planned visitation has "horrified" the New Order sectarians in Malta, whose Newbishop, Pawlu Cremona, has forbidden even the Half Novus Ordo Vatican II Mess of 1962+ and has refused to accept any responsibility for the continued assault and rape of children in Malta by his Newchurch presbyters. Cremona has refused any compensation to the child victims, even when their rapists have been criminally convicted. Clearly, Malta needs a visit by a real bishop!

At the same time it has been announced that Bernie Fellay, the Superior-Dictator of the Neo-SSPX, has spent his Neo-SSPXers money to hire a Dutch marketing firm to help him "spin" his attempted sellout to the New Order sect. The Dutch firm has been hired to create a "brand" for Fellay's Neo-SSPX, just as deceptive Madison Avenue companies brand corporations to sell their goods. This is a technique that the sinking Novus Ordo religious orders have been using for years. Fellay has learned well from his Novus Ordo puppeteers. Except that Madison-Avenue branding hasn't worked for the Novus Ordo sect, and it won't work for Fellay either. His Neo-SSPX will continue disintegrating, even faster than before.

Originally the Dutch company refused the contract because, as it wrote Fellay: "You don't have a good name out there, and I don't want my company to have the blemish of having you as a customer." But the company, after a six-hour meeting with Fellay, was convinced to take the contract. It was said that Fellay offered "a bundle of money," perhaps flowing from Fellay's dozen corporations in Europe, co-managed by Fellay's partner, the Jewish fundraiser and Dresden lawyer, Maximilian Krah.

The Dutch branding company, after some months' analysis of the Neo-SSPX, concluded that Fellay really looked bad when he continued to fight Newchurch of the New Order, that Fellay looked cruel. The company, therefore, recommended that Fellay must stop fighting the New Order. That is why already Fellay's Neo-SSPX web sites, his Neo-SSPX Angelus, and other Neo-SSPX organs have given up the fight against the Modernist Vatican II Council and the invalid New Mess. As one priest who recently left Fellay and his pseudo-traditionalistic Neo-SSPX wrote: "It seems to me that the Society has become a blunt sword in the hands of the Lord. There is no cutting edge anymore, it is useless!"



_________________________________________________________________________________

The Justice of God: "Bishop" Williamson, Rosicrucian Freemason decoy and Buddhists, Muslims, Yoruba join antipope for peace

Looks like a sniper in Afghanistan or Iraq for the invading militarists there.

Decoy

From Google:

Google server response time: 0.17 secs

1

Buddhists, Muslims, Yoruba join pope for peace ... - Washington Post

1 day ago ... Buddhist monks, Muslim imams, Orthodox patriarchs and Yoruba leaders have flocked with Pope Benedict XVI to the Umbrian hilltown of Assisi ...

www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/buddhists-muslims-yoruba-join pope for peace pilgrimage; traditional Catholics condemn it Similar

Washington Post defends the final consuming of those calling themselves traditional, such as the SSPX - including Rosicrucian Freemason Williamson (see article below), into the Abomination of Desolation of Assisi and Vatican II Total Apostasy - but which is utterly damned by God unto eternal damnation in hell forevermore.

2

Full Story - Associated Press

1 day ago ... Buddhist monks, Muslim imams, Orthodox patriarchs and Yoruba leaders have flocked with Pope Benedict XVI to the Umbrian hilltown of Assisi ...

hosted2.ap.org/COGRA/APWorldNews/Article_2011-10-27-EU-Vatican-Pe... Cached Similar

3

Buddhists, Muslims, Yoruba join pope for peace pilgrimage ...

1 day ago ... Pope Benedict XVI joined Buddhist monks, Islamic scholars, Yoruba ... for a peace meeting in Assisi, central Italy, Thursday, Oct. 27, 2011. ...

www.newser.com/article/d9qkmko84/buddhists-muslims-yoruba-join-po... Cached Similar

From:

http://www.virgo-maria.org/D-Mgr-Williamson-leurre/index_mgr_williamson_leurre.htm

Bishop Williamson: a decoy

Bishop Williamson - Part No. 8 - The (former?) Anglican Bishop 'Rose' of the Brotherhood, imposed in the middle of the SSPX, Derek Holland, an activist of the "new right" heathen Anglo-Saxon, an admirer of Gaddafi and Khomeini

Release of March 10, 2010

Following a series of new revelations about the company Williamson with media activists neocon Anglo-Saxon, the movement that revolves around the circles of the ambivalent British Fabian Society , the Round Table (Cecil Rhodes and Lord Rothschild ) and occult bodies globalists, capped by the upper loges, who shaped world history since Cecil Rhodes and his entourage, for the progressive march to the Masonic world government.
In the VM , we give biographical information of the activist Derek Holland , promoted and protected by British Bishop Williamson .

Derek Holland in 2004 lived in an apartment near the Vatican, and he was bound by commercial interests with John Forrest Sharpe [see VM Williamson - Part No. 7 ], another protégé of the mole No. 1 from the infiltrated early 1970s in the SSPX .

• Open the message .
• Download Post as PDF 

Bishop Williamson - Part No. 7 - The Bishop 'Rose' imposed and protected in the journal of the SSPX in the United States, and against the advice of Father Scott, a neo-fascist military activist naturalist Mr J. Forrest Sharpe

Publication of the January 24, 2010

Beginning of a series of new revelations about the company Williamson with media activists neocon Anglo-Saxon, the movement that revolves around the circles of the ambivalent British Fabian Society , the Round Table (Cecil Rhodes and Lord Rothschild ) and occult bodies globalists, capped by the upper loges, who shaped world history since Cecil Rhodes and his entourage, for the progressive march to the Masonic world government.
The Abbot Scott wanted to oppose the entryism of John Sharpe in the magazine The Angelus(equivalent Fideliter for the SSPX in the U.S.) and accused the military of being "fallen into naturalism and of betraying the Catholic Faith" . But nothing is done, despite the termination ofMr Sharpe 's Scott Abbot , Bishop Fellay did not support and left to the British bishop, Bishop Williamson'Cunctator-' , the former (?)-Anglican "Rose" of the Fraternity. On the contrary, theFather Scott was dismissed by Bishop Fellay of the Director of the Seminary of the Holy Cross in Australia, in summer 2008 and was sent to Canada in a job that removes it from any liability .

The tour canceled (fortunately at the last moment) Winona seminarians at the Pentagon September 11, 2001.

The recent resurgence apparently concerted Williamson, a duet of "role playing" with Father Celier media to try to recrédibiliser one and the other, in their role of dominance of one of the clerks of the SSPX.

1. Open the message .
2. Download Post as PDF 

Williamson's mother, follower of the Gnostic sect Protestant " Christian Science " , the religion of Milner Group ( Round Table British Rothschild clan-related), head of the vast Empire Victorian and historical matrix of globalism current Anglo-Saxon

Release of May 19, 2009

Helen Williamson , died in 2000, strong personality, was a fervent disciple of Mary Baker Eddy . Edna Andrews, governess of the Williamson family for 20 years, reveals the hidden past of Bishop Richard Williamson. Williamson chose for his episcopal coat of arms a symbolRosicrucian very similar to that of the Round Table UK. The evidence we publish today from research in the British press on the former Anglican Anglican minister's son, on the occasion of his provocative statements denying on Swedish television. These are the recent statements by his former housekeeper Edna Andrews in the Daily Mail February 7, 2009 who, having well known, dissipate the thick curtain of smoke to reveal some valuable details about the origins of family Mgr Williamson . Bishop Richard Nelson Williamson was born from the union ofMr. Williamson , Scottish Protestant Anglican, chief buyer at Marks & Spencers , who died in 1987, and Helen Williamson , who died at age 93 in 2000, a follower of the sect Protestant " Christian Science " , itself born in Paris to American parents wealthy . - (1) - Biographical new on Bishop Williamson , for his housekeeper for 20 years. - (2) - The Gnostic doctrine of " Christian Science " that his mother was a fervent follower. - (3) - The "Christian Science " , the religion of Milner Group , part historical Round Table UK. - (4) - The speech of Bishop Williamson to absolve Ratzinger-Benedict XVI for his heresies: a theory of " Christian Science " applied to the inside of the SSPX ? - (5) - Questions to the other three bishops consecrated by Archbishop Lefebvre in 1988.Based on the facts that Virgo Maria continues to accumulate: the origins of Williamson (Anglican pastor father, mother, follower of the " Christian Science " , a disciple of the former (?) - Fabien Malcolm Muggeridge , protective , officer and promoter of gay clergy predators, rapists, etc..) Archbishop Lefebvre had he chosen the Reverend Richard Williamson as a candidate to the episcopate? If Archbishop Lefebvre had learned these facts after the coronation, would he have kept Bishop Williamson in the SSPX ?

1. Open the message .
2. Download Post as PDF 

Bishop Williamson in London: the return of Bishop Rose of the fraternity to the parent British Fabians in?

Release of May 18, 2009

Bishop Williamson with a peaked cap, basketball, dressed fit for a star of the jet-set, indicates its silence a reporter at the airport of Buenos Aires, February 23, 2009. Lady Michele Renouf , a figure of bow of the denial, welcomed Bishop Williamsonon his arrival at the airport in London. Williamson was invited in October 2008 in London cocktail party organized by David Irving , biographer of Hitler , and with whom he maintains a regular correspondence. The file of this VM presents facts about the relations of the former (?)-British Anglican son of an Anglican minister and a member of the sect of "Christian Science," Bishop Williamson , and his incredible impunity, both civil society and within the SSPX, which readers will find of course not - and for good reason - nor Dici nor the Latin Gate . We see that pursued by the Jewish community and the Argentine government, the Bishop Rose of the Society of St. Pius X had to leave the country quickly to London on February 23, after an unsuccessful attempt to block the proceedings of his Holocaust denial broadcast by Swedish television, and after his "regrets" have was officially rejected by the Vatican. Bishop Rose was indicted Feb. 27 by the attorney of Regensburg, the German justice minister, Brigitte Zypries , has threatened to seek his extradition from Britain to Germany, under the agreements in Europe. This notice has remained mysteriously unanswered, Bishop Williamson has announced that it would use the House of Lords. What power superior to the German government has been able to stop and the secular arm was to hit Williamson? Requested by his knowledge, David Irving , a former young colleague of Oswald Mosley (founder of the British National Party close to the Third Reich in the 30's and who collaborated with Victor Rothschild to negotiate breakouts Germany), British historian asked Ms. Michelle Renouf , to ensure the home of Bishop Rose of the SSPX to Heathrow Airport, accompanied by his lawyers. At the airport in London, three private security guards were waiting for Bishop Williamson to be placed at his service. Mrs. Renouf , a former top model, professes a doctrine "Hellenistic" and pagan, steeped in Wagner and Nietzsche , and has shown by its unconditional defense of Irving to the point that his ideas are considered excessive by the British National Party . The pagan Ms. Renouf who hosted the former (?)-Anglican Bishop Williamson , has worked with Kenneth Humphreys , spreading outlandish thesis and radically anti-Christian denying the existence of Jesus of Nazareth. Williamson requested the support and the board the help of Irving in order to furnish arguments to justify its denial provocations media, all of their correspondence on the subject being published by The Times February 24. Irving recognizes closely assist the bishop in Rose of the SSPX. The Abbe Gaudron (SSPX), professor at the seminary in Zaitzkofen said on German television ZDF, that Bishop Williamson would have been an ultimatum from Bishop Fellay in the SSPX, which was to expire in late February. Over two and a half months have passed since and Bishop Fellay has of course declined, not daring to take any decision in respect of deportation. And at the same time, the same Bishop Fellay has fiercely expelled the brave Abbot Méramo which was simply wrong - recalling his loyalty to Archbishop Lefebvre and his fight for the faith, the priesthood and the Catholic sacraments - to refuse shame and suicidal "process" suicidal Bishop Fellay rallying-apostasy of the fraternity to the abbot apsostat Ratzinger-Benedict XVI . How far Bishop Fellay will he continue to endanger the SSPX keeping within it Williamson , Bishop Rose of the Brotherhood, whose action if solvent is now widely demonstrated, and known?

1. Open the message .
2. Download Post as PDF 

The destruction of the SSPX in the U.S. in 1983 by the abbots and Williamson Schmidberger

Release of February 28, 2009

The destruction of the SSPX in the U.S. in 1983 by the abbots and Williamson Schmidberger, moles 1 & 2, late vocations both infiltrated in 1972 within the SSPX to better run the work of Archbishop Lefebvre preservation Catholic priesthood sacrificial sacramentally valid. Second part of the record on the 'new'. Archbishop Lefebvre manipulated by the former (?)-British Anglican, future "Bishop Rose," and his accomplice the Father Schmidberger , then Vicar General of the SSPX and friend of the apostate priest Ratzinger , then "Cardinal", Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith -Wojtyla JPII . This VM which is the second part of the file on the defection - for serious reasons of conscience outlined in their "letter" published in the first part - the "new" priests ordained by Archbishop Lefebvre , who defected in 1983 led to the dismantling seminar Ridgefield United States of the Brotherhood, is one with the previous VM that shows readers traditionalist Catholic Europe - most of whom are unaware of these serious events across the Atlantic - the toxicity of repeated provocations and acts aimed at jeopardizing the Society St. Pius X from the British bishop Rose and his protégé the Father Ramon Angles , which have plunged and the work of Archbishop Lefebvre to preserve the Catholic priesthood sacrificial sacramentally valid, and his apostolate in the terrible disrepute from which it suffers today from the American Catholic traditionalists.

• [1] The 'Nine' against Mgr. Lefebvre - 2008 - Download in PDF
• [2] Letter of 'Nine' to Archbishop Lefebvre - 1983 - Download in PDF

1. Open the message .
2. Download Post as PDF 

Williamson and Father Ramon Angles rallied helped to discredit the SSPX in the U.S.

Release of February 26, 2009

How Bishop Williamson, Bishop Rose of the SSPX, and his protégé Father Ramon Angles rallied helped to discredit the SSPX in the United States: already provocations aimed at compromising the SSPX? "Angles GO HOME" plastered on the doors of the chapels of the SSPX in Kansas. The abbot Angles is currently in Dublin, Upper District of the SSPX for Ireland and a member of the General Chapter of the SSPX. In spring 2006, Williamson was in his class, as its candidate "ideal" for the post of Superior General of the SSPX, before the elections in July 2006. In June 2008, VM found that the Angles abbot has forbidden the sacraments a parishioner who had rescued the Father Babinet (SSPX). This VM is designed to inform the Catholic French and European traditional responsibilities of Bishop Williamson and his deputy the Father Ramon Angles in the deep discredit current SSPX in the United States. "But the abbot Angles grows criticism further. It seems that good government is its achievement in the anti-Semitic dictatorship of Nazi Germany. In an absurd inversion of good and evil, the murderer of the masses, the worshiper of the devil, Adolf Hitler is transformed into a type of Christian King. The abbot Angles has an apartment full of Nazi paraphernalia he shows favored boys. He shows them the ceremonial daggers worn by officers of the Third Reich. He is proud of the Mercedes collection owned by his family, which was once owned by Adolf Hitler . A student of the Academy was invited by the abbot Angles two years ago. In his room on campus, Angles offered him a pizza and showed him a film Nazi propaganda, The Triumph of the Will. He remade the film pass, stopping at times, and commenting earnestly reading the stack of transcripts of the speeches of Hitler that he had at his side. Leni Riefenstahl , the Film producer and head of the propaganda of the Third Reich is still alive and lives in South America. The abbot Angles often visits him (he speaks to his students), and boasts of intimacy. " Thomas W. Cage .

Every Catholic sense, must now ask clear questions: .1) Who is the British ex (?)-Anglican son of an Anglican pastor, Richard Nelson Williamson ? .2) Where does he?.3) Why did he join the seminar Ecône in 1972? Why Bishop Fellay has he still not expelled from the SSPX, as it intimately the laws of the Church, the former AnglicanBishop. Williamson - 'Cunctator'à the Rose? Why did not he expelled his henchman, the abbot Angles ?

• [1] File Ecclesia Dei Fidelity (French) - 1992 - Download in PDF
• APPENDIX A - FIDELITY ARTICLE - The Society of Saint Pius X is sick (the article that set fire to the powder, Oct 1992) by Thomas W. Case (October 1992)
• APPENDIX B - Letter - Fidelity Magazine - December 1992 - These letters were written in response to the article by Fidelity released in October 1992 under the title "The Society of St. Pius X gets sick." Among these letters are responses abbots Ramon Angles , Principal of the College and Academy St. Mary and Peter Scott , District Superior of the United States for the Society of St. Pius X. Between Mr Case and other faithful respond point by point to the letters, by providing additional facts.

1. Open the message .
2. Download Post as PDF 

Bishop Williamson: the "bin Laden" Rose of the SSPX

Release of February 22, 2009

Expelled from Argentina, Williamson disappears without trace at the request of Bishop Fellay continues to cover the bishop ex (?)-Anglican Rose of the Fraternity. Having "misinformed" the nature of its business in Argentina, Minister of Interior of Argentina sum Williamsonto leave the country within 10 days. Has he disappeared with his friends in the U.S.? According to Father Bouchacourt , quoted by Le Figaro(February 20, 2009), leaders of the SSPX "have conveniently decided that Bishop Richard Williamson was out of the jurisdiction of the territory of the Argentine nation. " This means that Bishop Fellay continues to protect Bishop Williamson , the former Bishop (?)-Anglican Rose of the fraternity insists on not wanting to evict the SSPX. The Abbe Gaudron , professor at the seminary of the SSPX to Zaitzkofen and foal from the Father Schmidberger , the infiltrated No. 2, told German television ZDF that within 10 days, Bishop Williamson was expelled from the SSPX s' it does not retract his remarks provocative denial. Le Figaro reported that the LICRA will initiate legal proceedings against Bishop Rose of the SSPX in "the course of next week." Already on February 10, the Argentine edition of Newsweek had filed a complaint against Williamson .The passivity of Bishop Fellay and his determination to keep against the laws of the Church - Bishop Williamson , the former (?)-Anglican Rose of the Society, within the SSPX, lined on the Enlightenment " conversion of Rome "and its apostate leaders, become criminal, and will soon place the SSPX to the wall, ordered to choose between the acceptance of Vatican II (in one form or another) and persecution by the civil authorities .

1. Open the message .
2. Download Post as PDF 

- SCOOP - The father of Bishop Williamson Rose is Anglican pastor

Release of February 22, 2009

Revelation of the Daily Mail on the family of Bishop Williamson who is the son of a heretic , a man whose'ordination 'England is totally disabled. This is published by the Daily Mail February 5, 2009: " Richard Williamson born 1940, son of a clergyman of Hampshire, and joined the Catholic Church in 1971 under the influence of Malcolm Muggeridge, British journalist who discovered Mother Teresa of Calcutta " . And Archbishop Lefebvre consecrated in 1988 was not only a "converted" to Anglicanism, but in addition a man whose father belonged to the pseudo-Anglican clergy. How, then, the Archbishop did he fail in this discernment and exercise of such lightness in his choice?It is absolutely incredible that with such a family background Williamson could find support in the community of Catholic Tradition and be recommended by Adrien Bonnet de Villers , or Paul Causeway , and many others, while s 'acts of "mole No. 1" of the SSPX. The son of an Anglican minister, the Cambridge graduate, has masterfully fooled the world in France. It also shows the incredible ignorance of these environments who gloated over the fact to study and know the subversion and revolution and, in fact, have never studied the subject of the Anglicans, the Rose + Croix, their ritual pederasty and secret societies of Anglo-Saxon Oxbridge. They are left to the knowledge of Cretineau-Joly , to the best of Jean Vaquié , but they have no marked progress in their reading and research since the early 1990s. They have almost 20 years late in the study. In reality, these self-proclaimed opponents of subversion have been for over 20 years, toys and relay unaware of the subtle subversion Anglo-Saxon, led by Bishop Williamson . So whenBishop Fellay he expel the SSPX, the former Anglican Bishop. Williamson - 'Cunctator'à the Rose, the old guard, officer and promoter of stubborn in Winona gay clergy predators Urrutigoity Carlos and Eric Ensey , and the order of priest "pédéRatz" Marshall Roberts ?

1. Open the message .
2. Download Post as PDF 

Why Bishop Fellay insists there to protect Bishop Williamson ?

Release of February 10, 2009

Bishop Fellay's why he insists - against the laws of the Church - to protect Bishop Williamson , the protector, officer, promoter of gay clergy rapists-predators, the challenger who is now at risk in the SSPX world? While the SSPX is sinking into a media tsunami, the former Anglican Bishop Williamson "persists and signs" pointing and all the SSPX to the secular arm of government, he openly disobeyed Bishop Fellayin granting an interview to Spiegel , the SSPX is now threatened with ban in Germany, that, at the same time Bishop Fellay has yet returned the Abbot Abrahamowicz , less guilty about but less publicized, the superior of the SSPX is content a scoop by dismissing Williamson from his position as director of the seminary of La Reja. For years Bishop Williamson , the British bishop was denounced at the Rose in the Catholic tradition to have protected, promoted and directed for 10 years, two rapists-predators gay clergy proved, the abbots Urrutigoity and Ensey , in his seminar Winona , of having ordered the clerk also homosexual, the Father Roberts .So why Bishop Fellay , violating any laws in this explicit in the Church since St. Peter Damian repressing homosexual clergy clerics guards, insists he so doggedly to keepBishop Williamson in the SSPX? Bishop Fellay would he in league with Williamson in the world orchestrated discredit the SSPX which destabilizes and now refers to all members of the secular arm of the European governments?

1. Open the message .
2. Download Post as PDF 

The Vatican is flying to the aid of Bishop Williamson by spreading the false rumor that he was "dying of cancer"

Publication of a ^st February 2009

Williamson called " Tricky Dickie "(Dick the cheater) by the Anglo-Saxon. 'Mgr' Negri, supported by the apostate priest Castrillon Hoyos, spreading the rumor of a pseudo disease and a moribund state of Bishop Williamson is dying, and Castrillon Hoyos called to pray for him. This fable is immediately spread with complacency by the media close to the Vatican and the British press, as well as by community rallied. The purpose of this deception is to protect Bishop Williamson by creating feelings of compassion for his health. Obviously Bishop Williamson is not sick and is worn like a charm as well as revealed its webmaster. Williamson participant in October 2008 in Windsor to a cocktail organized by the British writer Holocaust denier, Irving , prolific author of books on the Third Reich and ancient relationship of Sir Oswald Mosley , a member of the Fabian Society and chairman of the British Fascist Party. The hidden links between Rome and Williamson are beginning to break into the open, as well as its connections with the periphery of the British middle Fabien. Not only the letter of 28 January 2009 is in no way an apology and retraction but a new challenge where he coded symbolically reaffirms his words hated by claiming the "Hebrew Prophet of Truth." Decoding of this letter. The apostate priest Castrillon Hoyos , while it is modernist, however, knows very well the Scriptures, and informed reader has fully understood the significance of provocative Williamsonin his use of Jonas . And yet he is pleased with the "excuses" of Bishop Williamson . The collusion between the Vatican and the Holocaust denier Bishop provocative becoming more evident. We solemnly call to Bishop Fellay publicly to expel Bishop Williamson of the SSPX illico.

1. Open the message .
2. Download Post as PDF 

Bishop Williamson (SSPX) hosted and directed a pederast priest, Father Roberts

Publication of the January 23, 2009

A new scandal splashes gay cleric Bishop Williamson appears more as a provocateur and a manipulator that has no place in the SSPX. He allowed and ordered another clerk Winona pederast recognized as such: "A seminarian third year, Marshall Roberts was expelled from the Institute of Christ the King proposes to have a homosexual relationship in a letter addressee to a first-year seminarian. The Vice-rector of the seminary, which had the letter in hand, a confirmed the content. " (...) "Simply superiors closed their eyes to some cases but not others, as was the case for a third-year seminarian who was fired on the spot with his business after he had been established that harassed one of my colleagues in the first year. In fact, some years later the seminary, who had arranged to be ordained elsewhere, has found the way to the Society of St. John in America This has led immediate suspicions about this company traditionalist who enjoyed wide publicity, as homosexuals are recruited among themselves and help their young from predators 'catamites' and their innocent victims one by one. Also I'm not particularly surprised when allegations of homosexual rape in the Company have finally surfaced. " The Father Roberts was then recruited in 2006 by "Bishop" Fulham (to the episcopate very doubtful), formerly of Winona, who had studied with him. And since early 2006, he took his entourage to the chapel of St Michael the Archangel . This pseudo-"bishop," "Bishop"Fulham is vagus, but recognizes the authority of Pope and supports the "process" Bishop Fellay Rome. It is strongly opposed to sedevacantists, like Bishop Williamson . According to the Dimond Brothers , "Bishop" Fulhamis an anti-sedevacantist disguised as sedevacantist. He abused the good faith of the faithful sedevacantists. The pseudo-"Bishop" Fulham has posted on its site, a conference of 10 December 2008 of Bishop Williamson on the 25th anniversary of St Michaels . Therefore expects Bishop Fellay to expel defiant Bishop Williamson ?

1. Open the message .
2. Download Post as PDF 

Twist! Bishop Williamson now recognizes the infiltration of the SSPX

Publication of the December 31, 2008

According to Max Barrett , the former Anglican Bishop Williamson has to write to acknowledge the existence of a " clique of infiltrators"in the SSPX. The British bishop also recognizes that the " withdrawal of the decree of excommunication "is conditioned by Rome prior to the signing of a withdrawal request signed by the four bishops of the SSPX, which exposes and discredits the entire" Rosary Crusade"launched by Bishop Fellay . It remains to Bishop Williamson to provide us the list of infiltrators who make up the camarilla. What is it?Max Barret Will he ask? It would be the least of it. Then, since there is infiltration - that would never have tolerated Archbishop Lefebvre had he been aware - Bishop Williamson will he make this serious problem to Bishop Fellay asking for the dismissal of their positions and infiltrated expulsion of the SSPX? But in reality all this is a major operation in trompe-l'oeil of Bishop Rose of the SSPX. And for good reason: the " clique of infiltrators "it is he who runs in hand with the Father Schmidberger , as we have continued to show in the presentation of historical facts and overwhelming that concern them directly.

1. Read more ...
2. Download Post as PDF 

_________________________________________________________________________________

The Justice of God: The Apocalypse, the Book of the Revelation: 18. - The Complete Apostasy and fall into absolute Satanic decadence and Fall of Rome-the Vatican and its total destruction by the command of God Almighty
Father Lauriers rightfully condemns Msgr. Lefebvre's retreat from the truth.

Fr. Guérard des Lauriers to Msgr. Lefèbvre: ‘You Act like Pontius Pilate’

After Vatican II, Fr. Michel Louis Guérard des Lauriers, O.P. (1898 - 1988) was very concerned about the events taking place in the Church. In 1969 he was the primary ghost-writer who authored the famous [see link] Ottaviani Intervention, criticizing the new Mass. [also see: The Ottaviani Intervention: A Critical Study of the New Mass] Soon after Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre published his December 1978 letter to John Paul II offering to make an agreement between the SSPX and Rome, Fr. des Lauriers strongly opposed that proposal. In his public response, he depicted Msgr. Lefebvre as a changing character who held the traditional position to please his grassroots - a Pontius Pilate. In that letter he presented some of the earlier actions of Lefebvre that corroborate his claim. Today, as SSPX approaches Rome seeking an agreement, that earlier proposal of its founder as well as des Lauriers’ criticism are timely again. Since we have already posted Msgr. Lefebvre’s letter to John Paul II, now we present Fr. des Lauriers’ document in its entirety for our readers. Below is our translation from the French original posted on Sodalitium website, which can be read here. The subtitles are ours.   The Editor Archbishop, We Do Not Want this Peace Archbishop, You were clear in your letter about the outlines of a protocol of agreement between Ecône and Rome: Ecône, which up until now we support; Rome, which we resist, just as you do. The loyalty demanded by the service of the Truth obliges us to declare: We do not want this peace. It appears to be wise. It is, indeed, no more wise than Pilate pretended to be. Jesus was delivered to Pilate because He was accused of saying: “I am the King of the Jews” (John 19:21), whereas the Jews claimed to “have no other king than Cesar” (John 19: 15). In reality, Jesus was not brought before Pilate for a royalty “whose origin is not of this world” (John 18: 36). And Jesus did not mean to die to conserve anything. He did not mean to die for anything except to “give testimony to the Truth” (John 14:6); regardless of appearances, it was Pilate who depended on Jesus rather than Jesus on Pilate. Your Excellency, you submit the Mass to the Pope because it disturbs the celebration of the “new mass” (as Paul VI called it), just as Jesus disturbed the Pharisaic order “by teaching throughout all Judea” (Luke 23:5). IN REALITY, THE MASS SHOULD NOT BE SUBMITTED TO THE POPE, since the Pope must respect it. We want, with God’s grace, to testify to the Truth; we do not want a peace that “diminishes the Truth” (Psalm 11:2). The Archbishop is compared to Pontius Pilate Pilate resorts to expedients to save Jesus. He fails. Thrice he fails, in order to accentuate in a providential way that it is not possible to give testimony to the Truth unless one is in absolute accord with the Truth. Pilate thinks he can save Christ by having recourse to Herod. He is doubly fooled: by expecting Jesus to be saved by those who want His death and by “becoming the friend of Herod” (Luke 23: 12). It is a false unity, since it is a unity against the One who is the Truth. Your Excellency, you have recourse to the Pope to conserve the Mass. And you admit that there can be in the Church - inevitably in the same Church - the Mass that is THE MASS and the “new mass.” And you believe that “unity would be restored immediately at the level of the local Bishops.” Thus, the unity of the Church would no longer be the radiation of the unique Sacrifice “that Christ commanded from His beloved Spouse”! The unity would no longer be that of “the heavenly Jerusalem that is free and is our mother” (Gal 4: 26). Unity would find itself degraded into a juxtaposition made under the iron fist of an unconditional authority. This is a parody of unity! It is a sacrilege against unity! Archbishop, we do not want this peace or this unity, which would be against the Truth, against the sanctity of the Church, against the Liberty that comes only from the Spirit of Truth. To “save” Jesus, Pilate put Him on par with Barabbas (Marl 15: 9). How could Pilate, mocking the Justice that he should represent, imagine that a changeable mob would impose justice on their [Pharisee] leaders? Pilate could only wash his hands (Mat 27: 24). Your Excellency, in order to save the Mass that is the Mass, you put it on par with the “new mass,” in the name of the Religion that you profess. How can you imagine that, instructed by your example, those unstable and weak people who follow you rather than the Truth could restore the sense of the true Religion in a Church occupied by the “high priests” of the god of the Universe? One cannot sit at the same table with Satan. It is Hell that is paved with these good intentions that justify the means by their end, perpetrating a manifest evil under the illusion of doing a good. A young Fr. Guérard des Lauriers Your Excellency, we do not want this peace that sacrifices the demands of the Religion of “Sprit and Truth” (John 4: 23) for the passing satisfaction of a selfish tranquility. Pilate “found nothing in Jesus that merited death” (Luke 23: 15). It was, however, “by chastising Jesus” (Luke 23: 16), that Pilate thought to buy from the Jews the release of their Prisoner. The public order is worth it - isn’t it? Some lashes of the whip, even if they are unjust. But Pilate fails. The only result is that the Flesh of the Incarnate Word is scourged, His Blood flows, He Himself is humiliated. Your Excellency, if there were to be in the Church - God forbid - as you desire the Mass that is THE MASS and the “new mass,” the shrewd polls made about [the preferences of] the “people of God,” duly manipulated, would transform the Mass of the minority into a mockery. The only result would be that the broad sacrilegious practice [of the Consecrations in the “new mass”], but actually deprived of object [because these Consecrations actually do not take place], would have all their blasphemous character now effective against the [true] Real Presence. Have you considered this? Should the price of this false security, founded on the illusion of an unconditional submission to those who did all they could to destroy the Church, be to inflict on the Crucified Christ the blows of the most insolent flagellation ever? Your Excellency, we do not want this peace that would be laden with so many sins. It falls to us, to us and not to the Crucified Christ, “to complete” [by this accord] what would be lacking in this flagellation without us. Archbishop, your protocol of peace gives the final blow to a trust that we no longer can have in you, regarding both the question of the Mass and that of “authority.” How Msgr. Lefebvre changed Masses You have celebrated the “new mass” since the beginning of April 1969 until December 24, 1970. The body of St. Pius V, above, is at the Chapel of the Holy Sacrament, below, in Santa Maria Maggiore On May 5, 1969, some friends who venerated you, including the one who signs these lines, had come to assist at the Mass that you would celebrate at the altar where the bones of St. Pius V repose at the Roman Basilica of Saint Mary Major. Astonishment, scandal, sorrow! Over the tomb of St. Pius V, it was the “new mass” that you celebrated! Upon leaving, pressured in the square by respectful and sad questions, you declared: “If someone were to see Archbishop Lefebvre celebrating the traditional Mass, it would risk raising scandal.” To those same friends, who, encouraged by you, were working to write the text that became the Letter of Cardinals Ottaviani and Bacci, you gave comforting assurances: “We will have 600 Bishops [to sign this letter].” This would be enough to move the Pope! Instead, there was not one single Bishop, not even yourself. As a matter of fact, you were more concerned about “not giving scandal” than about defending the Truth. We fear that your letter n. 16 [to friends and benefactors] reveals that you did not change. You continued to celebrate the “new mass” both at Fribourg and Ecône. The first hopes, nonetheless, started to appear: Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Paul Aulagnier, Bernard Waltz, and three others. On December 24, 1969, at the end of the noon meal, the Dominican priest who signs these lines, then staying at Ecône, with respectful irony said this to you: “Monsignor, it is a pity that, while supporting Tradition, you celebrate the ‘new mass,’ which is not the Mass of the Tradition.” This simple observation literally set fire to the gunpowder. The “six,” all your living hope, exploded. Each one in his way and all together posed the same question to you: How is it possible to base fidelity to Tradition upon a “mass” that was “innovated” against Tradition? That incident was very vehement and, by the way, quickly closed. Still, be it by some coincidence due to the action of the Holy Ghost along with an interior movement on your part, the fact is that on December 24, 1970 at the midnight Mass, you returned to saying the Mass according to rite promulgated by St. Pius V, to the great joy of all present. Probably you followed the Holy Ghost. But, alas, everything has happened as if you were following your grassroots. Thenceforth you have followed the same tactic. If you would not have supported the Traditional Mass, the seminary of Ecône would have been deprived of its end, and those who supported you would have felt the obligation to abandon you. Suspicions of other doctrinal concessions to Progressivism Nonetheless, you have never made a serious doctrinal study of the “new mass.” You affirm it is valid without justifying it. And you have issued “norms” [on how to behave regarding it] from which many of the faithful, or even Ecône seminarians, can deduce whatever they want. And now - all this is unhappily too coherent - you admit that the Mass and the mass can exist together in the Church. This is “ecumenism” inside the Church, the paroxysm of a false ecumenism that replaces with a deceitful union the true unity, which is the unconditional submission to the Liberty inspired by the Truth. Lefebvre's changing positions, more interested in pleasing the grassroots than serving the Truth In the same way, Your Excellency, you admit that there could be a “traditional interpretation of Vatican II,” even after you had written – thanks be to God and to you – the work I accuse the Council. Why do you refuse to enunciate clearly, on the “authority” the principles that unavoidably explain your judicious accusations? Instead, as a supposed counter-attack, you imitate the [blind] false prophets who “lead each other into the pit” (Matt 15:14), by announcing a false peace followed by a false prosperity! We must either speak or be silent. But we cannot not proclaim the error and silence the truth. It is with profound sorrow, believe me Your Excellency, that we are obliged in conscience to remind you of this. We can no longer trust you. We are not “against you,” we are still “for you,” but we can no longer “be with you.” You count on saving everything through the SSPX; the whole Church, certainly, will be thankful to you for what you have done. But, Your Excellency, you promise too much to be true. Do you remember the promise of the 600 Bishops that never materialized? Remember that when on that “May 5, 1975 you acted firmly no matter what [against Rome],” it was because you opposed those whom today you think you can trust, those whose victim you have become since you are following them. Your Excellency, we can no longer “be with you.” We are only “unconditional” with regard to the Truth! Holy Thursday April 12, 1979 M.L. Guérard des Lauriers, O.P. In memory of a group of the faithful attached to Tradition Holy Thursday, April 3, 1969  -  The magazine Sodalitium reminds us that April 3, 1969 was the date of the promulgation of the New Mass, opposed publicly by Fr. des Lauriers in his Brief Critical Study

_________________________________________________________________________________

Apostasy: The Apostasy of the Vatican

The agreed upon ancient canons of the Church

Mortalium Animus - Pius XI; Canons of the Church

click on picture

As long as the agreed upon ancient canons of the Church were upheld there was a Catholicity to the Vatican. The process to end that began at the 1958 conclave and the final blow to any Catholicity of the Vatican occurred at the Assisi pagan gatherings where a new = a counterfeit 'gospel,' a false gospel of bringing exactly what is the base for the Antichrist to appear was revealed to a corrupt and vile world, instead of salvation. We are to come out from among them OR BE DAMNED WITH THEM.
THE APOCALYPSE OF ST. JOHN THE APOSTLE AND EVANGELIST

Revelation, Chapter 18
1 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 10:1; Ezek.: 43:2
2 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 14:8!; Isaiah: 13:21, 22!
3 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 14:8; 17:2; Jer.: 51:7!; Rev.: 18:9, 15
4 … Scripture reference – Jer.: 51:45!; 2 Cor.: 6:17!; Eph.: 5:7!; 1 Tim.: 5:22
5 … Scripture reference – Jer.: 51:9
6 … Scripture reference – Jer.: 50:29!; 2 Thess.: 1:6
7 … Scripture reference – Isaiah: 47:8
8 … Scripture reference –
9 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 18:3; 17:2; 18:18
10 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 18:15, 16, 17
11 … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27;32!
12 … Scripture reference –
13 … Scripture reference –
14 … Scripture reference –
15 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 18:3, 10
16 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 17:4
17 … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27:29, 30!; Rev.: 18:10
18 … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27:29, 30!; Rev.: 18:9
19 … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27:29, 30!, 32, 33!
20 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 12:12
21 … Scripture reference – Jer.: 51:63, 64
22 … Scripture reference – Ezek.:26:13!; Jer.: 25:10!
23 … Scripture reference – Jer.: 25:10!
24 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 16:6!

The Fall of Babylon

Rv:18:
1 ¶ And after these things, I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power: and the earth was enlightened with his glory. … Scripture reference – Rev.: 10:1; Ezek.: 43:2
2 And he cried out with a strong voice, saying: Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen: and is become the habitation of devils and the hold of every unclean spirit and the hold of every unclean and hateful bird: … Scripture reference – Rev.: 14:8!; Isaiah: 13:21, 22!
3 Because all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication: and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her; And the merchants of the earth have been made rich by the power of her delicacies. … Scripture reference – Rev.: 14:8; 17:2; Jer.: 51:7!; Rev.: 18:9, 15
Her Sins and Punishment
4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying: Go out from her, my people; that you be not partakers of her sins and that you receive not of her plagues. … Scripture reference – Jer.: 51:45!; 2 Cor.: 6:17!; Eph.: 5:7!; 1 Tim.: 5:22
5 For her sins have reached unto heaven: and the Lord hath remembered her iniquities. … Scripture reference – Jer.: 51:9
6 Render to her as she also hath rendered to you: and double unto her double, according to her works. In the cup wherein she hath mingled, mingle ye double unto her. … Scripture reference – Jer.: 50:29!; 2 Thess.: 1:6
7 As much as she hath glorified herself and lived in delicacies, so much torment and sorrow give ye to her. Because she saith in her heart: I sit a queen and am no widow: and sorrow I shall not see. … Scripture reference – Isaiah: 47:8
8 Therefore, shall her plagues come in one day, death and mourning and famine. And she shall be burnt with the fire: because God is strong, who shall judge her.

Dirge of the Kings

9 ¶ [1] And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived in delicacies with her, shall weep and bewail themselves over her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning: … Scripture reference – Rev.: 18:3; 17:2; 18:18
10 Standing afar off for fear of her torments, saying: Alas! alas! that great city, Babylon, that mighty city: for in one hour is thy judgment come. … Scripture reference – Rev.: 18:15, 16, 17

Dirge of the Merchants

11 And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her: for no man shall buy their merchandise any more. … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27;32!
12 Merchandise of gold and silver and precious stones: and of pearls and fine linen and purple and silk and scarlet: and all thyine wood: and all manner of vessels of ivory: and all manner of vessels of precious stone and of brass and of iron and of marble:
13 And cinnamon and odours and ointment and frankincense and wine and oil and fine flour and wheat and beasts [2] and sheep and horses and chariots: and slaves and souls of men.
14 And the fruits of the desire of thy soul are departed from thee: and all fat and goodly things are perished from thee. And they shall find them no more at all.
15 The merchants of these things, who were made rich, shall stand afar off from her, for fear of her torments, weeping and mourning, … Scripture reference – Rev.: 18:3, 10
16 And saying: Alas! alas! that great city, which was clothed with fine linen and purple and scarlet and was gilt with gold and precious stones and pearls. … Scripture reference – Rev.: 17:4
17 For in one hour are so great riches come to nought.

Dirge of the Mariners

And every shipmaster and all that sail into the lake, and mariners, and as many as work in the sea, stood afar off, … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27:29, 30!; Rev.: 18:10
18 And cried, seeing the place of her burning, saying: What city is like to this great city? … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27:29, 30!; Rev.: 18:9
19 And they cast dust upon their heads and cried, weeping and mourning, saying: Alas! alas! that great city, wherein all were made rich, that had ships at sea, by reason of her prices. For, in one hour she is made desolate. … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27:29, 30!, 32, 33!
20 Rejoice over her, thou heaven and ye holy apostles and prophets. For God hath judged your judgment on her. … Scripture reference – Rev.: 12:12

The Angel’s Promise

21 And a mighty angel took up a stone, as it were a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying: With such violence as this, shall Babylon, that great city, be thrown down and shall be found no more at all. … Scripture reference – Jer.: 51:63, 64
22 And the voice of harpers and of musicians and of them that play on the pipe and on the trumpet shall no more be heard at all in thee: and no craftsman [3] of any art whatsoever shall be found any more at all in thee: and the sound of the mill shall be heard no more at all in thee: … Scripture reference – Ezek.:26:13!; Jer.: 25:10!
23 And the light of the lamp shall shine no more at all in thee: and the voice of the bridegroom and the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee. For thy merchants were the great men of the earth: for all nations have been deceived by thy enchantments. … Scripture reference – Jer.: 25:10!
24 And in her was found the blood of prophets and of saints and of all that were slain upon the earth. … Scripture reference – Rev.: 16:6!
(DRV)

[1] -Ver. 9-19. This passage is not an account of a vision but rather a direct prophecy, after. the manner of the prophecies of Isaias and Ezechiel concerning Tyre. Tyre furnishes a type of the vengeance of God upon satanic pride and luxury.
[2] -Ver.13. Beasts [of burden]: the Greek has “cattle.”
[3] –Ver. 22 The city had boasted previously of her craftsmen, skilled in every craft.

Second Epistle Of Saint Paul To The Thessalonians, Chapter 2
verse 10 And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying:

note on verse 10 - God shall send them the operation of error,".... "God shall send" - in this case God allows the Diabolic to claim those who have willfully rejected God and committed the unforgivable sin of knowingly blaspheming the Holy Spirit - "operation of error: in the Greek is "energian planes," which is literally the energy of delusion - a Septuagint Greek reference to energy, in this one place only, being from Satan - instead of God as it always is everywhere else in the Bible. This is precisely what was spewed forth upon the world at Assisi to claim those who have willfully blasphemed the Holy Spirit and those who will willfully blaspheme the Holy Spirit as minions of Satan and Satan's coming Antichrist - the Devil's false messiah, the ad-Dajjal.

verse 11 That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity.

- that is what occurred here:
Diabolic Apostasy of the Assisi Pan Religion Interreligious Non-Catholic Non-Christian Pagan Revelry 


We are to remain with the ancient truths - NOTHING ELSE.As in the below -

The Unity of God is maintained against heresy saying otherwise or preaching modalism

BEWARE The Synagogue of Satan and The Name and Number of the beast.

The heresy of the "priesthood" over the "laity"

There are three most heinous heresies. They are anathema.

See: The Justice of God: Destruction of Babylon and all that are part of her.

All copyrighted sources are quoted and used for comment and education in accord with the nonprofit provisions of: Title 17 U.S.C., Section 107. This site is in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C., Section 107 and is protected under "Fair Use."