The Justice of God: Guantanamo and 911 and Operation Bluebird

Guantanamo and 911 and Operation Bluebird

The Justice of God: Guantanamo

The Justice of God: God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him: THE DAY ADMIRAL BOORDA DIED - Roots in ZioNazi Marine Corps Mob Killing Machine responsible for subverting the nation and handing over America to "Israel" on 911 - Part 2

911

Boorda - Clinton - Bush - 911

Project Bluebird is the kind of MKULTRA extensions ultimately responsible for:

Delator (8) 

Delatores (5)

PROJECT BLUEBIRD

Posts Tagged ‘PROJECT BLUEBIRD’

The Hidden Tragedy of the CIA’s Experiments on Children

Wednesday, August 11th, 2010

Truthout
By H.P. Albarelli Jr. and Dr. Jeffrey S. Kaye
August 11, 2010

Bobby is seven years old, but this is not the first time he has been subjected to electroshock. It’s his third time. In all, over the next year, Bobby will experience eight electroshock sessions. Placed on the examining table, he is held down by two male attendants while the physician places a solution on his temples. Bobby struggles with the two men holding him down, but his efforts are useless. He cries out and tries to pull away. One of the attendants tries to force a thick wedge of rubber into his mouth. He turns his head sharply away and cries out, “Let me go, please. I don’t want to be here. Please, let me go.” Bobby’s physician looks irritated and she tells him, “Come on now, Bobby, try to act like a big boy and be still and relax.” Bobby turns his head away from the woman and opens his mouth for the wedge that will prevent him from biting through his tongue. He begins to cry silently, his small shoulders shaking and he stiffens his body against what he knows is coming.

To find out more about psychiatry/
government experiments, watch this
interview with Psychiatrist and Author,
Colin Ross

Mary is only five years old. She sits on a small, straight-backed chair, moving her legs back and forth, humming the same four notes over and over and over. Her head, framed in a tangled mass of golden curls, moves up and down with each note. For the first three years of her life, Mary was thought to be a mostly normal child. Then, after she began behaving oddly, she had been handed off to a foster family. Her father and mother didn’t want her any longer. She had become too strange for her father, whose alcoholism clouded any awareness of his young daughter. Mary’s mother had never wanted her anyway and was happy to have her placed in another home. When the LSD Mary has been given begins to have its effects, she stops moving her head and legs and sits staring at the wall. She doesn’t move at all. After about ten minutes, she looks at the nearby physician observing her, and says, “God isn’t coming back today. He’s too busy. He won’t be back here for weeks.”

From early 1940 to 1953, Dr. Lauretta Bender, a highly respected child neuropsychiatrist practicing at Bellevue Hospital in New York City, experimented extensively with electroshock therapy on children who had been diagnosed with “autistic schizophrenia.” In all, it has been reported that Bender administered electroconvulsive therapy to at least 100 children ranging in age from three years old to 12 years, with some reports indicating the total may be twice that number. One source reports that, inclusive of Bender’s work, electroconvulsive treatment was used on more than 500 children at Bellevue Hospital from 1942 to 1956, and then at Creedmoor State Hospital Children’s Service from 1956 to 1969. Bender was a confident and dogmatic woman, who bristled at criticism, oftentimes refused to acknowledge reality even when it stood starkly before her.

Despite publicly claiming good results with electroshock treatment, privately Bender said she was seriously disappointed in the aftereffects and results shown by the subject children. Indeed, the condition of some of the children appeared to have only worsened. One six-year-old boy, after being shocked several times, went from being a shy, withdrawn child to acting increasingly aggressive and violent. Another child, a seven-year-old girl, following five electroshock sessions had become nearly catatonic.

Years later, another of Bender’s young patients who became overly aggressive after about 20 treatments, now grown, was convicted in court as a “multiple murderer.” Others, in adulthood, reportedly were in and of trouble and prison for a battery of petty and violent crimes. A 1954 scientific study of about 50 of Bender’s young electroshock patients, conducted by two psychologists, found that nearly all were worse off after the “therapy” and that some had become suicidal after treatment. One of the children studied in 1954 was the son of well-known writer Jacqueline Susann, author of the bestselling novel “Valley of the Dolls.” Susann’s son, Guy, was diagnosed with autism shortly after birth and, when he was three years old, Dr. Bender convinced Susann and her husband that Guy could be successfully treated with electroshock therapy. Guy returned home from Bender’s care a nearly lifeless child. Susann later told people that Bender had “destroyed” her son. Guy has been confined to institutions since his treatment.

To their credit, some of Dr. Bender’s colleagues considered her use of electroshock on children “scandalous,” but few colleagues spoke out against her, a situation still today common among those in the medical profession. Said Dr. Leon Eisenberg, a widely respected physician and true pioneer in the study of autistic children, “[Lauretta Bender] claimed that some of these children recovered [because of her use of shock treatment]. I once wrote a paper in which I referred to several studies by [Dr. E. R.] Clardy. He was at Rockwin State Hospital – the back up to Bellevue – and he described the arrival of these children. He considered them psychotic and perhaps worse off then before the treatment.” (This writer could find no case where any of Bender’s colleagues spoke out against her decidedly racist viewpoints. Bender made it quite clear that she felt that African-Americans were best characterized by their “capacity for laziness” and “ability to dance,” both features, Bender claimed, of the “specific brain impulses” of African-Americans.)

About the same time Dr. Bender was conducting her electroshock experiments, she was also widely experimenting on autistic and schizophrenic children with what she termed other “treatment endeavors.” These included use of a wide array of psycho-pharmaceutical agents, several provided to her by the Sandoz Chemical Co. in Basel, Switzerland, as well as Metrazol, sub-shock insulin therapy, amphetamines and anticonvulsants. Metrazol was a trade name for pentylenetetrazol, a drug used as a circulatory and respiratory stimulant. High doses cause convulsions, as discovered in 1934 by the Hungarian-American neurologist and psychiatrist Ladislas J. Meduna.

Read entire article here:  http://www.truth-out.org/the-hidden-tragedy-cias-experiments-children62208

Tags: Bellevue Hospital, children, cia, CIA Experiments, Creedmoor State Hospital, electro-shock therapy, electroconvulsive therapy, experiments,Jacqueline Susann, Ladislas J. Meduna, Lauretta Bender, lsd, Metrazol, mind control, MKUTLRA, neuropsychiatrist, PROJECT BLUEBIRD, Rockwin State Hospital, Sandoz Chemical Co.

The CIA Mind Control Doctors: From Harvard to Guantanamo

Thursday, September 3rd, 2009

by Colin A. Ross
Psychiatrist, Author,
The CIA Doctors, Military Mind Controland Project BluebirdSeptember 3, 2009

My book, The CIA Doctors,^[i] is based on 15,000 pages of documents I received from the CIA through the Freedom of Information Act and dozens of papers published in medical journals.  These papers report the results of research funded by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Department of the Army, the Office of Naval Research and the CIA.  From 1950 to 1972, the CIA funded TOP SECRET research at many leading universities including Harvard, Yale, Cornell, Johns Hopkins and Stanford.  There was a series of CIA mind control programs including BLUEBIRD, ARTICHOKE, MKULTRA, MKSEARCH and MKNAOMI.

MKULTRA and related programs had several over-lapping purposes.  One was to purchase mind control drugs from suppliers.  Another was to form relationships with researchers who might later be used as consultants at the TOP SECRET level.  The core purpose of these programs was to learn how to enhance interrogations, erase and insert memories, and create and run Manchurian Candidates.  All of this is described clearly and explicitly in the declassified CIA documents, which provide a glimpse into the tip of the iceberg of CIA and military mind control.

The CIA mind control experiments were interwoven with radiation, chemical and biological weapons experiments conducted on children, comatose patients, pregnant women, the general population and other unwitting groups who had no idea they were subjects in secret experiments.  Radiation, bacteria and funguses were released over urban areas.  A large cloud of radiation was released over Spokane during OPERATION GREEN RUN; plutonium was injected into a comatose patient in Boston by Dr. William Sweet, a member of the Harvard brain electrode team; plutonium was placed in the cereal of mentally handicapped children at the Fernald School in New England; 751 pregnant women were injected with plutonium at Vanderbilt University; the bacteria serratia maracens was released into the air in San Francisco, resulting in a series of infections and plutonium was injected into an amputee at the University of Rochester.  All these experiments were conducted without any informed consent or meaningful follow-up.  Hallucinogens, marijuana, amphetamines and other drugs were administered to imprisoned narcotic addicts in Lexington, Kentucky, terminal cancer patients at Georgetown University Hospital, hospitalized sex offenders at Ionia State Hospital in Michigan and johns picked by prostitutes hired by the CIA in San Francisco and New York.

Most of these experiments were conducted by psychiatrists with TOP SECRET clearance.  These included Louis Jolyon West, Chairman of the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Oklahoma and later at UCLA; Dr. Robert Hyde in Boston; Dr. Carl Rogers at the University of Wisconsin; Dr. Martin Orne at Harvard; Dr. Charles Osgood at the University of Illinois; Dr. James Hamilton at Stanford; Dr. Charles Geschichter at the University of Richmond and Dr. Harold Abramson and Dr. Harold Wolff at Cornell.  Other TOP SECRET-cleared MKULTRA contractors included Dr. Maitland Baldwin, a neurosurgeon at the National Institutes of Health and Dr. Carl Pfeiffer, a pharmacologist at Emory.

The CIA doctors violated all medical codes of ethics dating back to Hippocrates, including the Nuremberg Code.  The experimental subjects were not told the real purpose of the experiments, did not give informed consent, were not afforded outside counsel and received no meaningful follow-up.  As described by the psychiatrists in published papers, experiments with LSD and other hallucinogens, combined with sensory deprivation, electroshock and other interrogation techniques, resulted in psychosis and death among other “side effects.”   The purpose of these experiments was to see how easily a person could be put into a psychotic state or controlled.

In a series of MKULTRA projects, the CIA paid a former Bureau of Narcotics officer, George White, to set up safe houses in San Francisco and New York that were decorated like brothels.  George White then hired prostitutes to pick up johns at bars, bring them back to the safe house, give them LSD without their knowledge, and then have sex with them.  The CIA officers watched the sex through one-way mirrors.  The project documents state that the purpose of the experiments was to test the effects of LSD on unwitting subjects under field conditions that mimicked an interrogation of a foreign operative.

In one of the memos contained in the MKULTRA files for these projects, however, another purpose of the safe house operation is revealed.  The CIA was actually testing the performance of “Jekyll-Hyde” identities they had created in the prostitutes.  They wanted to see if they could make female spies or female agents with alternate controllable personalities.  Another purpose of these experiments was to test the CIA’s Manchurian Candidate prostitutes under conditions that mimicked a field operation.  The johns were given LSD as part of the cover for testing the CIA’s female Manchurian Candidates prior to their use in actual operations (the mission being to have sex with and extract information from targets).  The recruitment of street prostitutes provided an additional layer of cover for the testing of the Manchurian Candidates, plus it provided free live pornography for the CIA officers.

In other experiments, conducted by Dr. Jose Delgado at Yale and Drs. Vernon Mark, Frank Ervin and William Sweet at Harvard, brain electrodes were implanted in people and their mental state and behavior was controlled from a remote radio transmitter box.  These experiments were conducted with funding from the Office of Naval Research.  In experiments at Tulane funded by the CIA and the Army, implantation of brain electrodes was combined with injecting mescaline and other substances directly into the experimental subjects’ brains.

BLUEBIRD, ARTICHOKE and MKULTRA were the precursors of present-day enhanced interrogation programs used by the CIA at secret prisons outside the United States.  Water-boarding, electric shock, hooding, prolonged sleep deprivation, death threats and other techniques discussed in the Senate and Congress and in the media, are, in my opinion, elements of a limited hangout, a CIA strategy in which a little bit of the truth is revealed in order to cover up the greater part of the truth.  None of these experiments or operational programs would be possible without the participation of doctors, psychiatrists and psychologists.  The doctors are directly involved in testing the interrogation techniques and monitoring their effects.

The purpose of mind control experiments is controlling human behavior: making enemy combatants open up during interrogation; protecting secret information by erasing memories; making spies more resistant to interrogation because secret information is held by hidden identities and making people more prone to influence, social control and suggestion.  It has nothing to do with medical treatment, easing suffering or curing disease. The mind control experiments and operational programs violate basic human rights and all codes of medical ethics.

Dr. Colin Ross is a psychiatrist, internationally renowned researcher, author and lecturer. In addition to The CIA Doctors and Military Mind Control, he is also author of Project Bluebird, in which he exposes unethical experiments conducted by psychiatrists to create amnesia, new identities, hypnotic access codes, and new memories in the minds of experimental subjects. His research is based on 15,000 pages of documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. Dr. Ross is a past president of the International Society for the Study of Dissociation. He is the founder and President of the Colin A. Ross Institute for Psychological Trauma.

---

^[i] Colin A. Ross (2006). The CIA Doctors: Human Rights Violations By American Psychiatrists. Richardson, TX: Manitou Communications.

Tags: artichoke, biological warfare, chemical warfare, cia, CIA documents, Colin Ross, Eli Lilly, FOIA, Freedom of Information, guantanamo,interrogation, manchurian candidate, military, mind control, mind control experiments, MKUTLRA, Operation Green Run, PROJECT BLUEBIRD, prozac,psychiatrists, psychiatry, radiation, torture, water-boarding

The Return of MKULTRA? Evidence Mounts that Drugs Were Used on CIA “Ghost Detainees” During Coercive Interrogations

Interrogation Contracts That the CIA Won’t Let You See

CIA doctors face human experimentation claims: Medical ethics group says physicians monitored 'enhanced interrogation techniques' and studied their effectiveness

Guantanamo

Predecessors to Guantanamo 

God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him: The Illuminati: The monopoly shell game. Oil and Diamonds, reasons for the Illuminati to destroy the Middle East and Africa.:

 Being a world power, there were restrictions on what the United States would commit itself to, and — as a new colonial power itself — it was not going to intervene politically or militarily for the Orange Free State or the Transvaal Republic. However, the elites, and much of the press, and the people of the United States, were sympathetic to the Boer cause.

When, at the end of the war, one of the stalwarts of the Transvaal forces, and a pioneer in another innovation of that war, the modern commando army, General Benjamin Johannes Viljoen was released from prison on the Isle of Saint Helena (where Napoleon was also isolated), there was nothing much for him to come home to. Before the way, Viljoen had been a dirt farmer, during the war, an expert on asymetical warfare, and afterwards, an exile in need of a job.

Viljoen wasn’t the only Afrikaner exile. A number of “enemy combatants” had been held in Bermuda, and like some of their carceral descendants today (to coin a phrase) in Guantanamo, could not be returned to their homeland for political reasons. Where to send them? Why Mexico, of course!

The early 20th century was the heyday of “white” settlement in northern Mexico. Porfirio Diaz’ cientificoshad, in keeping with the Social Darwinist theories of the time, assumed that European (or European-descended) immigrants would, simply on the basis of their bloodlines, improve the stock in the largely undeveloped north. So…

Exiles from the “detention centers” in Bermuda, led by Wilhelm Snyman (who was allowed to leave Bermuda for the United States) were offered a chance to buy undeveloped properties in Mexico at cut-rate prices. The Mexican government was willing not just to take the Afrikaners, but to assist them in founding an exile colony. But, the Mexican government only had so much money available and the Boers were expected to pay something for the land. And these guys were broke.

The Freedom of Information Times

World War II - The Internment of

German American Civilians

This webpage was originally created by Arthur D. Jacobs

 Major, USAF Retired; Researcher: Internment in the United States during

World War II, December 7, 1941 - July 1948

From a digital archive of C-SPAN video:  http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/289436-1   

Archivist Lynn Goodsell talks about various aspects of the World War II "enemy alien control" programs and related records available at the National Archives. Besides the well known internment camps in California and Nevada for people of Japanese ancestry, she noted that camps were also set up for Germans and Italians throughout the United States and Latin America. Ms. Goodsell used PowerPoint to illustrate her presentation. She also responded to questions from members of the audience. "World War II Enemy Aliens Program" was a "Know Your Records Program" held in the National Archives Research Center at 11 a.m. on Tuesday, October 13, 2009.

This web site contains research materials on the wartime treatment of U.S. and Latin Americans of German ancestry for serious researchers, students and persons seeking general information

The World War II experience of thousands of German Americans, to most,  is an unknown.  During World War II, the U.S. government and many Americans viewed German Americans and others of "enemy ancestry" as potentially dangerous, particularly immigrants.  The government used many interrelated, constitutionally questionable methods to control persons of German ancestry, including internment, individual and group exclusion from military zones, internee exchanges, deportation, repatriation, "alien enemy" registration, travel restrictions and property confiscation.

The human cost of these civil liberties violations was high.  Families were disrupted, if not destroyed, reputations ruined, homes and belongings lost.  By the end of the war, 11,000 persons of German ancestry, including many American-born children, were interned. 

Pressured by the United States, Latin American governments collectively arrested at least 4,050 German Latin Americans.  Most were shipped in dark boat holds to the United States and interned.  At least 2,000 Germans, German Americans and Latin American internees were later exchanged for Americans and Latin Americans held by the Third Reich in Germany.

The mission of this web site is to tell the story of thousands whose lives were forever changed because the United States suspected them of disloyalty.  Government suspicion was based upon national origin and led to great hardship.  Their story must not be forgotten. It deserves to be told.  To date, it remains shrouded in history.

Summary of German American Wartime Experience.«« Click here for more details.

Please visit other areas of this web site, including the sections containing Personal Stories, Images, Media Coverage and Congressional Action, by clicking on the Site Links on the left side of your computer screen.

_________________________________________________________________________________


Gauntanamo

None: Book Review: 'The Terror Courts' By Jess Bravin : NPR:

Excerpt

It's forgotten now, but in the days and months after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, none of the major arms of the national security service — not the CIA, not the FBI, not the Justice Department, not the Pentagon — contended that the federal courts were inadequate to handle the task of prosecuting and convicting terrorists. Rather, as Bravin shows, the construction of a parallel legal system was a governmental power grab: a shift of authority from the legislative and judicial branches to the executive, masterminded by Bush-era lawyers and advisers such as David Addington, the vice-presidential legal counsel known as "Cheney's Cheney," and John Yoo, who penned the so-called "torture memos" at the Justice Department. These architects of the expansive executive branch did not want an ad hoc military tribunal, such as in Nuremberg after World War II. They wanted their own permanent system, under their control, and they built it from scratch. "In effect," writes Bravin, "today's military commissions are the legal equivalent of a war of choice."

CCIJ: George W. Bush and the "War on Terror"

In his memoir, former U.S. president George W. Bush admits that when he was asked if waterboarding should be used against a detainee in U.S. custody, he replied “Damn right.” Despite the admission that he authorized mistreatment of detainees, Bush has not been investigated or held accountable for his actions in the United States -- or by any judicial body elsewhere. Bush has enjoyed global impunity for his role in the torture of detainees held in Guantánamo, Abu Ghraib, Bagram and secret CIA “black sites.”

On September 29, 2011, CCIJ and the US-based Center for Constitutional Rights sent a letter and draft indictment to the Attorney General of Canada calling for the investigation and prosecution of George Bush when he visited Surrey, BC on October 20, 2011. Despite a follow-up letter, they received no response. 

As a result, CCIJ Legal Director Matt Eisenbrandt initiated a private prosecution in Provincial Court in Surrey against the former president on behalf of four individuals who allege they were tortured during Bush’s tenure. The four men took this step after the lack of action by the Attorney General. Over 50 human rights groups and prominent individuals signed aletter in support of the effort.

The four men, Hassan bin Attash, Sami el-Hajj, Muhammed Khan Tumaniand Murat Kurnaz, each endured years of inhumane treatment including beatings, chaining to cell walls, being hung from walls or ceilings while handcuffed, lack of access to toilets, sleep, food and water-deprivation, exposure to extreme temperatures, sensory overload and deprivation, and other horrific and illegal treatment while in U.S. custody at military bases in Afghanistan and/or at the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay. While three of the men have since been released without ever facing charges, Hassan bin Attash still remains in detention at Guantánamo Bay, though he likewise has not been formally charged with any wrongdoing.

Within only hours, CCIJ was notified that the Attorney General of British Columbia had already intervened in the case and stayed the proceedings, effectively shutting down the prosecution. Several days later, CCIJ received a letter confirming the Attorney General's intervention. CCIJ and the Center for Constitutional Rights released a statement condemning the politically motivated action.

Only later – over two weeks after Mr. Bush’s visit – did CCIJ receive a two-sentence letter from the federal Department of Justice, signed by the manager of the Correspondence Unit, acknowledging only that our correspondence had been received.

Committee against Torture

On April 20, 2012, CCIJ and CCR filed a report with the United Nations Committee against Torture, the body charged with interpreting and applying the Convention against Torture. The submission detailed the ways in which Canada violated its obligations under the Convention by failing to prosecute Mr. Bush. The report also lays out the ways in which the Attorney General of British Columbia thwarted the private prosecution. CCIJ and CCR called for the Committee to reprimand Canada for its actions and inaction in the Bush case.

The Committee examined Canada on May 21 and 22, 2012.The Canadian Press reported that Canadian officials expected to be "grilled" about the refusal to prosecute Mr. Bush. On the issue of the visits by Mr. Bush and Dick Cheney, talking points for Canada's delegation mentioned nothing about Canada's obligations under the Torture Convention but rather pointed to the complexities of torture prosecutions and the firmly entrenched principle of prosecutorial discretion in Canada. The delegation was also told to make clear that "[t]o ensure the most efficient use of resources, Canada prioritizes suspects who reside in Canada." "If pressed," the talking points said, the Canadian delegation should say they cannot comment on specific criminal complaints.

  

In its Concluding Observations, although not mentioning the Bush case specifically, the Committee recommended that Canada "take all necessary measures with a view to ensuring the exercise of the universal jurisdiction over persons responsible for acts of torture, including foreign perpetrators who are temporarily present in Canada." CCIJ highlighted those comments in a report to the Department of Canadian Heritage.

On November 14, 2012, CCIJ and CCR, on behalf of the four torture survivors, filed a complaint against Canada with the Committee against Torture. The complaint asks the Committee to declare that Canada violated its legal obligations under the Convention against Torture when officials refused to prosecute Mr. Bush and intervened to terminate the private prosecution. In filing the complaint, the survivors are seeking answers as to why their efforts to pursue justice were thwarted in Canada and calling for improvements in how Canada handles cases in which alleged torturers are present on Canadian soil. The complaint was accompanied by a letter from CCIJ and CCR, several annexes of documentation and a press release.

More Information

• CCR's casepage on George W. Bush

Guantanamo Psychologists

The CCIJ and CCR have also called on the Canadian government to investigate psychologists who may have been involved in abusive interrogations at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere. Responding to reports that some Guantanamo psychologists would travel to Toronto for a convention of the American Psychological Association, the organizations sent a joint letter to Canada's Minister of Public Safety requesting an investigation into whether any APA members had a role in war crimes or torture.

Specifically, the groups pointed to significant public information concerning retired U.S. Army colonel and psychologist Dr. Larry C. James, who was a high-ranking advisor on interrogations at Guantanamo in the spring of 2003.  Dr. James currently serves as the President of the APA's Division 19 for Military Psychology.  From January to May 2003, Dr. James was Chief Psychologist of the Joint Intelligence Group and a senior member of the Behavioral Science Consultation Team (BSCT) in Guantanamo. Public documents and Dr. James' own book indicate that he played an influential role in interrogation and detention policy and practices at Guantanamo during a time when detainees were subjected to tactics and conditions that amounted to torture or other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.  Canadian citizen Omar Khadr is one of the prisoners who has claimed he was treated brutally in the spring of 2003 when Dr. James was stationed at the facility.

The CCIJ and CCR are calling on the Canadian government to to investigate whether action should be taken against Dr. James or others attending the APA conference who may have been involved in abusive interrogations.

Amnesty International-Canada has also issued a letter supporting the CCIJ/CCR call for action.

Read the CCIJ's press release

Access the public documents referenced in the CCIJ/CCR letter either through a list of individual documents or in a complete set available on CCR's When Healers Harm website.

***

The U.S.-based Center for Justice & Accountability (CJA), on behalf of New York psychologist and professor Dr. Steven Reisner, has also filed a complaint with the New York State Office of Professional Development alleging that Dr. James' predecessor at Guantanamo, Dr. John Francis Leso, violated professional standards of conduct at the prison.  Leso led a team of mental health professionals that assisted in the interrogation of prisoners at the time Canadian detainee Omar Khadr was brought to Guantanamo.  CJA and the New York Civil Liberties Association have now filed suit in New York state court against the Office of Professional Discipline for its failure to investigate the Leso complaint.