God's declaration of Truth


Luke Chapter 19

The words of Our Only Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in red.

19:10 "For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost."
19:11 As they were hearing these things, he added and spoke a parable, because he was nigh to Jerusalem and because they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately be manifested.
19:12 He said therefore: "a certain nobleman went into a far country, to receive for himself a kingdom and to return.
19:13 And calling his ten servants, he gave them ten pounds and said to them: Trade till I come.
19:14 But his citizens hated him and they sent an delegation after him, saying: 'We will not have this man to reign over us.'
19:15 And it came to pass that he returned, having received the kingdom: and he commanded his servants to be called, to whom he had given the money, that he might know how much every man had gained by trading,
19:16 And the first came saying: 'Lord, thy pound hath gained ten pounds.'
19:17 And he said to him: 'Well done, thou good servant, because thou hast been faithful in a little, thou shalt have power over ten cities.'
19:18 And the second came, saying: 'Lord, thy pound hath gained five pounds.'
19:19 And he said to him: 'Be thou also over five cities.'
19:20 And another came, saying: ' Lord, behold here is thy pound, which I have kept laid up in a napkin.
19:21 For I feared thee, because thou art an austere man: thou takest up what thou didst not lay down: and thou reapest that which thou didst not sow.'
19:22 He saith to him: 'Out of thy own mouth I judge thee, thou wicked servant. Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up what I laid not down and reaping that which I did not sow.
19:23 And why then didst thou not give my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have exacted it with usury?'
19:24 And he said to them that stood by: 'Take the pound away from him and give it to him that hath ten pounds.'
19:25 And they said to him: 'Lord, he hath ten pounds.'
19:26 But I say to you that to every one that hath shall be given, and he shall abound: and from him that hath not, even that which he hath shall be taken from him.
19:27 But as for those my enemies, who would not have me reign over them, bring them hither and slay them in my presence."
19:28 And having said these things, he went before, going up to Jerusalem.
19:29 And it came to pass, when he was come nigh to Bethphage and Bethania, unto the mount called Olivet, he sent two of his disciples,
19:30 Saying: "Go into the town which is over against you, at your entering into which you shall find the colt of an ass tied, on which no man ever hath sitten: loose it and bring it.
19:31 And if any man shall ask you: 'Why are you loosing it?' You shall say thus unto him: Because the Lord hath need of it.' "
19:32 And they that were sent went their way and found the colt standing, as he said unto them.
19:33 And as they were loosing the colt, the owners thereof said to them: "Why are you loosing it?
19:34 But they said: "Because the Lord has need of it."
19:35 And they brought it to Jesus. And casting their cloaks over the colt, they set Jesus on it.
19:36 And as he went, they spread their cloaks upon the road.
19:37 And when he was drawing near, being now at the descent of the Mount of Olives, the whole company of his disciples began to rejoice and to praise God with a loud voice, for all the miracles that they had seen,
19:38 Saying: "Blessed is he who comes as king, in the name of the Lord! Peace in heaven and glory in the highest!"
19:39 And some of the Pharisees, from the crowds, said to him: "Master, rebuke thy disciples."
19:40 He said to them: "I tell you that if these keep silence, the stones will cry out."
19:41 And when he drew near, seeing the city, he wept over it, saying:
19:42 "If thou also hadst known, and that in this thy day, the things that are to thy peace: but now they are hidden from thy eyes.
19:43 For the days shall come upon thee: and thy enemies shall cast a trench about thee and compass thee round and straiten thee on every side,
19:44 And beat thee flat to the ground, and thy children who are in thee. And they shall not leave in thee a stone upon a stone: because thou hast not known the time of thy visitation."
19:45 And entering into the temple, he began to cast out them that sold therein and them that bought.
19:46 Saying to them: "It is written: My house is the house of prayer. But you have made it a den of thieves."
19:47 And he was teaching daily in the temple. And the chief priests and the scribes and the rulers of the people sought to destroy him.
19:48 And they found not what to do to him: for all the people were very attentive to hear him.

The Second Epistle of St. Paul to the Thessalonians

The day of the Lord is not to come till the man of sin be revealed. The apostle's teachings are to be observed.

2:1 And we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and of our gathering together unto him:
2:2 That you be not easily moved from your sense nor be terrified, neither by spirit nor by word nor by epistle. as sent from us, as if the day of the Lord were at hand.

Chap. 2. Ver. 2. Spirit . . . utterance. . . letter indicate three possible sources of their belief that the parousia is imminent. Spirit refers to some falsely claimed revelation, utterance may be a statement of Paul’s which was misunderstood, or wrongly attributed to him, the letter seems to be one forged in Paul’s name.

2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for unless there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition

Ver. 3. . . The parousia must be preceded by a great apostasy, i.e., a great religious revolt, and the advent of the man of sin, i.e., Antichrist. Son of perdition, one entirely deserving of eternal punishment.

Ver. 3. The day of the Lord will not come. These words have been inserted to complete the sentence, which in the original is elliptical. The expanded reads "Let no man deceive you by any means: for the day of the Lord will not come unless there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition"

2:4 Who opposeth and is lifted up above all that is called God or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God.

Ver. 4. In the temple, that of Apostate Jerusalem which the full consensus of the Church Fathers declare he will rebuild - i.e. the Temple of Remphan; and in the Apostate shell of the former Christian church, which he perverts to his own worship: as the Freemasons have done to the Vatican.

Ver. 4. Antichrist will be characterized by great impiety and pride. He sits in the temple of God, etc. He will aspire to be treated as God and proclaim that he is really God.

2:5 Remember you not that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
2:6 And now you know what restrains him, that he may be revealed in his proper time.

Ver. 6. What restrains him. The Thessalonians knew the obstacle. We also know that it is Jesus Christ.

2:7 For the mystery of iniquity is already at work: only that he who is at present restraining it, does still restrain, until he is gotten out of the way.

Ver. 7. Mystery of iniquity, the evil power of Satan’s threefold prevarication and total Apostasy from God, of which Antichrist is to be the public exponent and champion. He who is at present restraining it. The obstacle is now spoken of as a person. Some point out that Michael the archangel and his heavenly army are obstacles, and this is true, which now prevent the appearance of Antichrist – but the primary obstacle is, as St. Justin Martyr teaches: Jesus Christ Himself; when the great Apostasy is complete, then in effect, Christ is “gotten out of the way.”

2:8 And then that wicked one shall be revealed: whom the Lord Jesus shall kill with the spirit of his mouth and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: him

Ver. 8. When Christ appears in glory, He will inflict defeat and death on Antichrist by a mere word of command.
2:9 Whose coming is according to the working of Satan, in all power and signs and lying wonders:

Ver. 9 – 10. By the aid of Satan Antichrist will perform prodigies which men will falsely regard as miracles, and by means of which they will be led to adopt sinful practices.

2:10 And with all wicked deception to those who are perishing. For they have not received the love of truth that they might be saved.
2:11 Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying:

Ver. 11. God shall send. . .That is God shall suffer them to be deceived by lying wonders, and false miracles, in punishment of their not entertaining the love of truth.
Ver. 11. 'God sends.' God will allow their willful rejection of truth to have its natural results of spiritual blindness, impenitence and damnation. A misleading influence, or, “a delusion.” The operation of error - the Greek reads: "energian planes" or literally the energy of delusion, which is exactly and actually the fallen spirits of the devils and demons conjured by pagan religion, especially by idolatry. NOW, currently, the Assisi delusion of the Apostates, Ratzinger and Wojtyla and many others present with them, is a very real and prime example. To give oneself over to this is to invite utter and complete damnation of oneself by God.
2:12 That all may be judged who have not believed the truth but have consented to iniquity.

2:13 But we ought to give thanks to God always for you, brethren, beloved of God, for that God hath chosen you firstfruits unto salvation, in sanctification of the spirit and faith of the truth:
Ver. 13. First-fruits, i.e., earliest believers in the gospel. Some manuscripts read: “from the beginning.” That is, God called them from all eternity.
2:14 Whereunto also he hath called you by our gospel, unto the purchasing of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.

2:15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast: and hold the teachings, which you have learned, whether by word or by our epistle.
Ver. 15. Teachings, i.e., his teachings whether given orally or in writing. Concerning Apostolic teaching – the oral is included in the written at the point we have the whole New Testament complete, i.e. with the completion of St. John’s Gospel.
2:16 Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God and our Father, who hath loved us and hath given us everlasting consolation and good hope in grace,

2:17 Exhort your hearts and confirm you in every good work and word.

St. Irenaeus

St. Irenaeus
St. Irenaeus Against Heresies and the warning against the Antichrist - click on picture

Blog List

A few words

The articles posted in the main here are from a variety of sources and perspectives, but all based on the unchangeable truth that all law comes from God, or if it is something that pretends a legalism but does not agree with God's law, then it is nothing lawful at all; the Noachide nonsense is the prime example of that which is not at all lawful. See the right side pane and below the posts at the bottom of the page for a number of sources that help shed light on this. All copyrighted sources are quoted and used for comment and education in accord with the nonprofit provisions of: Title 17 U.S.C., Section 107.

By Command of God


GO HERE: Traditional Catholic Prayers: Eucharist in house churches Commanded by God. To rise above the concerns of the world to the service of God.

Traditional Catholic Prayers: Office of the Hours for the Week

Go Here: The Return of Christ

And here:
Parousia of Jesus Christ Our Lord

The Promise of His coming. His commands to prepare and be worthy.

Statement of what is happening in the world in connection with the Second Coming of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Nuzul i Isa and Qiyamah, the Parousia of Jesus Christ Our Lord and His judgement of all men that have ever lived.

Rv:22:7 Behold I come quickly. Blessed is he that keepeth the words of the prophecy of this book.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012


This series of articles are all linked by this label: Vatican II is damned

Drummond Ties to Rothschilds

Previous Chapter


Could it be that some of the powerful Drummonds were Rosicrucians? Amid my hunches I had my doubts at first, but with the discovery that the Drummond clan was descended from a mixture of Hun and Rus blood, which alternatively is to say, Gog-As peoples, there grows reason to be suspicious. For, it appears that the British Rosicrucians were, not just Gog-As peoples, but concerned with placing a British ruler(s) on the throne of the world in the name of Christ, something that I think the Catholic Apostolic Church was also concerned with.Henry Drummond Jr., the founder of that church, is not to be confused with the author, also Henry Drummond (born 1851), who wrote the "New Evangelism" and was yet an evolutionist with Rosicrucian stripes. For he also wrote, "The Ascent of Man." I have not been able to find the particular kinship between this Drummond and the one who founded the Catholic Apostolic Church, but a couple of paragraphs exposing the former is in order here to show that an influential Drummond was writing things that were expected of Rosicrucians at that time.
In the New Evangelism we read from Drummond: "...I move for a little among lines of thought which may seem to verge on danger." Indeed, he intended to move the reader into a new way of applying the Bible and spirituality, and even a new view of God using a certain Reason that he glorified as imaginative and intelligent, but that meshed God with the science of the Royal Society (founded by Rosicrucians). He writes: "In several well-known instances [science] has already imposed upon religion the useful task of remodeling its doctrines; and in each case the gain has been in the direction of greater inwardness, greater naturalness, greater spirituality. And the still more interesting fact remains to be noted, that it is generally science itself which supplies the material for the remodeled doctrine." And he says that illustrations of the Last Judgment (of God) "are presentations to an age which has passed away."
Thus, he was in the business of turning leaf from the old age to a new one, and we can be sure that he wasn't working alone, for he was pushing nothing less than a Christianized Age of Reason/Age of Enlightenment, and in fact he defined his New Evangelism as the "Gospel for the Age," a phrase that implies a new gospel for a new age. In short, this man intended to move the Christians of his day into liberal Christianity. Now, the Unitarians and Universalists were the classic liberal Christians, and these had founded the World Evangelical Alliance in 1846, in a London Freemasonic hall...the very hall said to hold the worldwide Freemasonic leadership. Could Drummond have been striving to promote the values and New-World quest of that organization?
The Apostolic Church, of the other Henry Drummond (Jr.), also had an elaborate evangelism program, where head evangelists were called "angels." Edward Irving, the pastor of the cult, was himself an angel...but was also a Universalist who, like the Unitarians, had some ideas about Jesus that lowered Him from the position of Godhood. As a charismatic, he had no bones about stealing sheep from "dead" or "old-fashioned" churches. He was on to a new thing, the Pentecostal movement.
Henry Drummond Jr. was a politician and a London banker of the Drummond banking world, wherefore he rubbed shoulders with Rosicrucians if he wasn't one himself. He not only founded his cult, but fostered the Jews' Society, neither of which had anything to do with converting non-believers to the Holy Spirit on the one hand, or Jews to Christ on the other. Both organizations were tools for fostering a Biblical Millennium that, because it wasn't God's Millennium, was counterfeit. Remember, the Catholic Apostolic Church was intended as a Europe-wide organization, to be ruled by 12 (new) Apostles, and even had an apostle over the United States.
Henry Drummond Jr. was himself an author. Prior to the writing of "Histories of the Noble British Families" (wherein he told of Drummond roots originating in George, son of king Andrew of Hungary), a William Drummond of Strathallen (d-1688) had earlier written a history of the Drummond clan as well, and he too claimed ancestry with the same Hungarians (by the way, the Drummond bankers were also Strathallens). William's history of the Drummonds "remained in manuscript till the year 1831, when one hundred copies were printed for private circulation(http://www.electricscotland.com/webclans/families/strathallan.htm).
The website above does not tell who circulated the copies (nor for what reason) well over a century after the work was written. But as it just so happened that Henry Drummond established the Apostolic Church in 1830, whom do we suppose published 100 copies of Drummond family history for the first time ever in the year of 1831? Notice that the copies were for private audiences; one could get the impression that Henry circulated these copies to his inner-circle cult members. If true, why? Per chance, was he enlightening his team concerning Drummond roots in Hungary?
When Oliver Cromwell defeated the Stuart supporters among whom there were the Drummond clans, the above-mentioned William Drummond fled Scotland and entered the Russian army, and then became Governor of Smolensk in Muscovy. Strange. Why would a British Drummond want to support the Russians, and how could a foreigner find such a high position there so fast? It just so happens that Smolensk had been the frontier of what came to be known as "White Russia," and the peoples of White Russia--who made it white--were, not only the Varangian Rus, who themselves were Gog-As peoples, but also the Slavs who, as descendants of the Sarmations, were yet other Gog-As peoples. Know, therefore, if you haven't read previous chapters, that the Drummonds were not only descended from the rulers of Hungary, but from the rulers of the Varangian Rus...who themselves had married Slavic wives!!! Yes, king Andrew had married the daughter of a Varangian Rus ruler (Yaroslav) to produce George, the patriarch of the Drummond family.
Recall from previous chapters that the As peoples turn out to be the true Aryans (i.e. the true Aryans are not the Gomerians/Ashkenazi, as many assume). The Gogi, if they were not As peoples themselves (by being a branch of Cimmerians), had been the Scythians who gave birth to the Sarmations, the latter of whom were half As peoples and who branched out as the white Huns, especially the Alans. Perhaps Henry Drummond Jr. had the history of the Drummond clan circulated to his inner circle for to show them that they were either of Gogi, or true-Aryan, bloodlines. I'm certain that the pre-tribber must be shooting ballistic thoughts at me for this proposal, for he must realize by now that I'm raising the possibility of a tie between Rosicrucian Aryanism and the pre-tribulation rapture.
As for the Hungarians, to this day they claim descent from "Finno-Ugrians." "Finno" is the Celtic word for "white" (the Celts were themselves Cimmerians and therefore As peoples, not Gomerians as is assumed by most). "Ugri" may derive from "Gug," but much more certainly from the well-recognized historical term,"Ugor," denoting the white-Hun federation (sometimes called "Bulgars") that brought forth the Khazars (who were blue-eyed, blondes). These white Huns were the Gogi, for the Khazars became the founders/rulers of the Kok-Turk empire, where "Kok" is a recognized variation of "Gog." Many peoples from the Khazar empire migrated west to establish the Hungary that would soon be ruled by Andrew and that would therefore give birth to the Drummond family.
As for the Varangian-Rus side of the Drummonds, previous chapters show how they could descend from the Roxolani (or Ros-Alans), an As peoples without doubt. Because the Roxolani were in the region of the Cimmerian-As peoples during the latter's migration (in 90 BC) to Scandinavia (to become the Swedes and Danes), I suspect that the Roxolani were a branch of Cimmerians. It's an historical fact, anyway, that the Varangian Rus stemmed from Sweden, and a near-fact that "Rus" derives from "Ros." It is in these peoples that I see the roots of the Rosicrucians...at least, the Rosicrucians of Britain.
As the Drummonds were part Roxolani, if indeed the Varangian Rus were descended from Roxolani, this in itself could be reason enough for the Drummonds to have been associated with Rosicrucians. And because the proto-Hungarians had been associated with Khazaria, we might even expect a Drummond-Rothschild alliance if it's true, as many are now saying, that the Rothschilds originated in Khazaria, especially if the Rothschilds were running forward with the baton of Khazar Zionism. For, the Rosicrucians were also interested in a form of Zionism, albeit an unorthodox form.
What you are about to read comes merely from short-term my studies into possible Rothschild-Drummond connections, and yet may already be large enough to convince pre-tribulationists to drop pre-tribulationism like a lead ball. I came across some reliable information, from a Royal-bank-of-Scotland website, suggesting to me that the Drummond banking world was doing business with Mayer Rothschild in relation to the formation of the United States (1776). It seems very possible that Drummond bankers partook in certain military affairs of Mayer's boss, Frederick II of Hesse-Cassel, Germany...not to be confused with Frederick II, king of Prussia, and living in the same time period:
"Masons of every denomination - Rosicrucians, Centralists, Illuminate - had all, under [the king of Prussia's] reign, the liberty of establishing lodges and societies according to their fancy, provided they did not disturb the public order."Thus Berlin became the receptacle of sects, of parties, of conjurations, of chemical mysteries, and of extravagances of every kind"(http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/frederickgreat.html).
This Frederick II, king of Prussia, was son to the sister of George II, Hanoverian (i.e. German) king of England, who was herself daughter to George I, the first Hanoverian king of England. Frederick II of Hesse-Cassel married the daughter of George II, and the two gave birth to William IX of Hesse-Cassel, the prince through whom the Rothschild empire owes its existence. These blood ties between British and German rulers seem extremely important, for (in the next chapter) we are going to see how Britain and Prussia formed an alliance to provide alternating bishops of Jerusalem in a Zionist scheme that involved Henry Drummond Jr. and, in my opinion, the Rothschilds.
Were the Drummonds important and wealthy enough to form alliances with the Rothschilds? We learn that from the marriage of the eldest daughter of Sir John Drummond to king Robert III (1390),
"all the succeeding Kings of Scotland and of Britain have been descended from the House of Drummond, and there is Drummond blood in the veins of most of the crowned heads of Europe" 
(http://www.electricscotland.com/webclans/dtog/drummon2.html)."As a bank, the Drummonds were said to be able to withstand the call of half the world" (Blackheath Connection, Dan Byrnes
At another website, we learn exactly when the Drummond bankers became huge: "The bank proved highly successful during the last quarter of the eighteenth century..." That's exactly during and after the 1776-1783 Hessian-soldier rental period, throughout which time we see Drummond bankers working under the British Treasury to oversee payments to British soldiers in America. The Hessian soldiers made up about half (or more) of the British forces in America, and it's quite possible that the Drummonds were also overseeing their pay. If so, then there you have it, a possible Drummond-Rothschild link, for the rented Hessian soldiers belonged to Mayer Rothschild's boss!!
The Rothschilds became wealthy by banking and working the monies of rulers rather than merchants, and in that way they could also run the course of history by being wicked enough to turn their customers into their puppets. We can now know that the Drummonds were also dealing with rulers, and in fact they gavea loan to George III in 1778. But, the question is, were they also manipulating their ruler-customers? If so, to what end? Perhaps it just so happened, or perhaps it was by design, that the Drummond bankers were in charge of the king's affairs while American Independence hung in the balance:
"In addition two of the [Drummond] partners were involved in substantial Treasury contracts for the payment of British troops in Canada and America before and during the American War of Independence. The firm also kept accounts for King George III and other members of the royal family. By 1815 Messrs Drummond had over 3,500 accounts. In 1824 customer deposits exceeded £2 million" 
In the business of handling money for the royals and/or politicians, the Drummond bankers may have been joined by the new kid on the block, the banking House of Rothschild, for "...within five years [of 1810], Nathan [Rothschild] had become the chief financial advisor to the British government"(http://www.minesandcommunities.org/Company/rothschild01.htm).
The question is, where did Nathan get all his money to make loans within political spheres, when his father was yet a commoner in the mid 1760s while running merely his Red-Shield shop (in Frankfurt, Hesse)? Apparently, the moment of opportunity arrived for Mayer when king George III (grandson of George II) needed more soldiers than Britain could provide, apparently, to fight the rebel Americans. George knew that the rulers of Hesse-Cassel had rented soldiers to Venice and other countries previously, and, besides, the current ruler of Hesse-Cassel, Frederick II, was his cousin. Thus, a deal was signed between these two cousins; of the more than 30,000 soldiers rented, more than 15,000 were from Hesse-Cassel and some 2,500 from Hesse-Hanau, the latter being the jurisdiction of Frederick's son, prince William IX, Mayer's other boss. According to one internet site, it was Mayer himself, under "Count Frederick of Hesse [who] formed a group known as the Hessian soldiers" (http://www.glencoin.com/house.htm).
Okay, so what did we have here? We had Mayer working for Frederick, whose cousin was George III, a king who was receiving loans from the Drummond bankers. And what do we suppose the king was borrowing money from the Drummonds for if not to pay the rental fees for the soldiers he so badly needed from Frederick? If that answer is correct, then the Drummonds were potentially lending king George a whopping amount of money, for Britannica recorded that 3,191,000 pounds were paid in rental fees to Frederick II during the eight-year period (1776 to 1783) in which the rentals continued.
Frederick made Mayer his personal banker at this time, and who knows if Mayer had been honest with the ruler's money. Several websites claim that Mayer secretly invested (i.e. temporarily stole) tens or even hundreds of thousands of pounds from William, and that this money was from the soldier rentals. How do we know that there wasn't a lot more "borrowed" or out-right stolen previous to that?
Now, there were plenty of Drummonds in Britain. What are the chances that the two Drummonds who were working with the Treasury, and/or the ones who loaned money to the king, were closely related to Henry Drummond Jr., founder of the Catholic Apostolic cult? The nearness of the kinship might boggle your minds, pre-tribulationists, so hang on to your hats.
It was in 1767 that the British Treasury began to employ two Contractors in partnership to oversee payments to North American soldiers, and one of the Contractors was John Drummond, banker and cousin of Henry Drummond Sr., also London banker and father of Henry Drummond Jr., also London banker and founder of the Catholic Apostolic cult!! When John fell sick in 1772, and especially when he died in 1774, Henry Drummond Sr. himself took over as Contractor!!! You can bank on this information because it comes from a Royal-Bank-of-Scotland website
If that website is no longer in service, see Drummond Contractors.
Aside from the two Drummonds, there were two other Contractors: first, while John was the Partner on the Drummond side, there was a wealthy merchant, Deputy Governor of the Bank of England, London Mayor for a year, and previously Sheriff of Chippenham, Sir Samuel Fludyer. Then, when he died (1768), Thomas Harley, wealthy merchant, banker, London Mayor a year previous (1767) and London Sheriff before that, became the Partner along with Henry Drummond Sr. And Thomas daughter, Martha Harley, even married a George Drummond (of Strathallen).
A very influential Harley, Sir Robert, was the uncle of Thomas the Contractor. Sir Robert became powerful in Parliament by befriending queen Anne, and she was taken in; it was she who first made Robert Earl of Oxford (after over five centuries in which the Veres held the title), then chancellor of the Exchequer (1710), and finally High Treasurer of England (1711). But he had been a squirrel of sorts, turning from Whig to Tory to support Anne, but then betraying Anne to support James II and the Jacobite uprising of 1715. For his troubles, Sir Robert spent two years in prison for high treason. And I should also point out that Sir Robert Harley's son, the second Earl of Oxford, was nearly the wealthiest man in Europe.
It was from this situation, then, that Thomas Harley became a Contractor on behalf of the Treasury department, just after, and following in the footsteps of, the Deputy Governor (Samuel Fludyer) of the Bank. It should be added that Sir Robert's grandfather, also Robert Harley, had been for 23 years (1626-1649)"Master and worker of Moneys to be coined in the Tower of London." Can we ask if the Harley family had some sort of monopoly on the English money bags? The following sheds some intriguing light on the Harley clan:
From Sir Robert, the Harley line can be traced back around 70 generations, and is linked directly to the majority of Royal families in Europe, and if you choose to believe the claims in the controversial book Bloodlines Of The Holy Grail, is a direct descendant of Jesus [i.e. the Rose Line]. Some of the more famous "characters" in the line are Charlemaine, Clovis...Duncan I...Richard the Fearless...Richard II...William "The Conqueror"...Ethelred II "The Unready", Thor, Mary of Scotland "Bloody Mary"...Rollo...Robert II...Henry II...In fact name just about any European or Viking ruler pre 1500 and they will be a direct ancestor or cousin" (http://www.speedlink.com.au/users/joking/green.html)
I have included only the names that are pertinent to my story here. If you are familiar with the names, then you'll know that some of them were Vikings/Normans or descendants thereof. If for these reasons and others the Harley clan had ancestry with Vikings, then the Harleys involved with the Treasury appear to be Rus descendants and for that reason may have been, not pawns of, but leading Rosicrucians. It is interesting indeed that the Earls of Oxford immediately prior to the Harleys, from 1135 to 1702, were the Veres, a family that to this day have members claiming to be of the Dragon bloodline.
The Drummond Bankers originated from Andrew Drummond, a Strathallen Drummond and Jacobite supporter. In fact, Andrew became a successful banker precisely due to his Jacobite leanings. Moreover, he started the bank in 1712, just as Sir Robert Harley (i.e. another Jacobite) was flying high in Parliament and the Treasury. Can we discern a general partnership between the Treasury-related Harleys and the Drummonds, therefore, that developed long before the Drummond-Harley Contractors formed their partnership on behalf of the Treasury? And did these partners abuse their political positions while having such close reach of the nation's money bags???
The Contractor, Samuel Fludyer, had been the largest British broker in wool and cloth sales. In light of that, consider this next statement concerning the Contractor that replaced him: "Thomas Harley, the 3rd Earl of Oxford¹s remarkable son, who made a fortune from supplying pay and clothing to the British Army in America and became Lord Mayor of London in 1767 at the age of thirty-seven"
It appears that Fludyer and Harley together were involved in selling cloth. Granted, I can't find any document (on the internet) to tell if Harley sold cloth/uniforms for Hessian soldiers (i.e. as well as for British soldiers), but such a scenario is logical. After all, and this is the important part, it is known that Mayer Rothschild, living in Hesse and having business relations with the lords of the Hessian soldiers, had been purchasing cloth in England at about that time!! Afterward (1798), Mayer had even sent his son, Nathan, to England to oversee his cloth/textile business. And this Nathan would become, according to many, the invisible chief of the Bank of England. But how could merely a textile merchant accomplish such a thing? Did the Harley family help him out? The Drummonds??
Although I cannot find the company from which Mayer was purchasing his cloth in England, how easy is it to imagine him making the purchases from the Thomas Harley Contractor...who just-so-happened made a fortune selling cloth/uniforms for soldiers at that time?
Because he was in charge of paying the wages of the North American soldiers, Harley was likely in charge of paying the rental fees for Hessian soldiers as well, especially if it's true that his partner, Drummond, was loaning king George the money for those fees. Mayer, as Frederick's personal banker and what-not, would have taken those fees and in return used them to purchase cloth from Harley. Everyone involved gets rich, except George III who lost the war, and the British people who paid the taxes to the Treasury. Now, take a look at following:
According to William Guy Carr, in Pawns In The Game, the initial meeting of [certain bankers] took place in Mayer Amschel Bauer's [i.e. Mayer Rothschild's] Goldsmith Shop in Frankfurt in 1773...His purpose was to convince them that if they agreed to pool their resources they could then finance and control the World Revolutionary Movement and use it as their Manual of Action to win ultimate control of the wealth, natural resources, and manpower of the entire world" 
Who might the bankers have been that attended that Rothschild meeting, and/or other meetings afterward? Dare we include Henry Drummond Sr.? The year of the first meeting (1773) was just three years prior to the official formation of the Illuminati by Rothschild's mate, Adam Weishaupt. Thus, Weishaupt was likely in attendance. It became Weishaupt's task to ruin the French monarchy and the Vatican rulers of France. And just a half dozen years after the last Hessians soldiers from America had returned to Germany, they were sent by William IX (Mayer's boss) to fight the French Revolution (1789)...where the Age of Enlightenment was foisted upon France like a big bloody club.
But I note from the afore-mentioned Royal-Bank-of-Scotland article that Henry Drummond Sr. became a Contractor in 1772, just the year prior to the first meeting at Rothschild's shop. Therefore, if he was at that meeting, then Mayer and his bosses had potential access to the funds of the English Treasury through him. Therefore, assuming that Drummond and/or Harley were involved in the World Revolutionary Movement of the Illuminati, couldn't we also assume that monies from the Treasury were obtained for that cause? This could explain why Mayer sent his son, Nathan, to England on the pretension of starting a cloth business, but where Nathan soon-after seized control in the Bank of England.
It seems logical to assume, even without firm evidence, that William and/or his father had been part of the secret Rothschild meetings. As long after the first meeting as 1801, William IX made Mayer his official agent. And it was yet a few years later that William entrusted a phenomenal sum of rental-fee money to Mayer's keeping. With some of Mayer's money, if indeed it was his, Nathan started his own bank in London upon moving there in 1809. He then took over operations at England's Royal Mint Refinery.
More war, more profits to be made. By 1815, Nathan was financing the Duke of Wellington for the battle of Waterloo, and Nathan found a way to make an incredible amount of money through that war. He "became chief broker and pay master general to England's most important army [Wellington's]; the Rothschilds were England's lifeline for getting paycheques to the English army"
How interesting. Nathan was in the same soldier-paying position as had been the Drummond bankers a generation earlier!!! Doesn't that serve as evidence to suggest that the Rothschilds were connected with the Drummonds right from the start, and that they were therefore able to follow in the Drummond footsteps?
Napoleon lost, Europe was divided up, the House of Rothschild knew that they had a big enough bite on the continent to rule it, and just then, Henry Drummond Jr. had a religious experience (1817). By 1826, Henry initiated his own meetings at his own Albury mansion, with some 20 men (some of whom we will meet in the next chapter) willing to start a movement that would, not look after widows, not preach self-sacrifice, but set up end-time Israel and simultaneously rule Europe in the name of Christ. Yet God had no intentions of ruling Europe. For Europe had been given to Satan, and will be given to him again; She will ride on that Demon drunk with the blood of the Saints, only to be betrayed by him in the end, and dead she will fall in a fiery "hour" that she knows not (Revelation 17-18).
Starting in 1814, at the very time that Nathan Rothschild found the power of his influence working well in British politics, all 20 homes of Rossal, Scotland, were cleared out in what is known as the "Sutherland Clearance." In this tragedy, the chiefs of the Sutherland clans betrayed their own citizens, farmers and cattle raisers, in favor of raising sheep for the wool trade. It's a well-known treachery (it's all over the internet) that was started by the countess of Sutherland, whose husband had a Jewish-sounding name: Levenson. Might Nathan have been behind the clearances to further his own cloth/textile business? Could it be that he and his father had continued to clothe Hessian soldiers throughout the French revolution up until Napolean's defeat? Sounds logical. But with whose money were the clothes tailored and distributed? The British Treasury's???
It has been said by many that the House of Rothschild would go on to fund both sides of wars, and even to promote wars, just so to make money on war instruments, including weapons.
Could it be that the Sutherland Clearances were a planned driving away of bloodlines belonging to the few remaining people of Rossal, the ancient town that had a name identical to one of the original nine Templars, that smacked of "Ross" and "Rose" and the Jewish version of "Russell," which was "Roessal." Or was it the other way around, that the people driven away were not Ros(e) Line members so that they were cleared out...to allow Ros(e) Line members to re-populate the region? Just a thought.
In the bigger historical picture, the Sutherland clearances were merely the last acts of a Highlander persecution that started earlier, as a result of Highlanders rising up against the British government, as the Jacobites protecting their bloodlines--especially the blood of the so-called "Stuart kings." The Highlanders were solidly defeated (1745), whereafter many, including the Drummond clan, lost their lands. The Drummonds were to receive back their lands (but not the titles) in 1784, the very year after the Drummond-Harley Contractors ended their work with the Treasury. The Titles were returned in 1830, the very year that Henry Drummond Jr. founded his Apostolic cult. Coincidences? I dunno.
I learned that from the Jacobites stem the Jacobins of Bavarian-Illuminati stripes: "Historians pretend to be puzzled by the speedy transformation of many Jacobites to Jacobins" 

Clearly, this gives us reason to believe that the Drummonds would have tended to support the Jacobin crushing of France's monarch in the first phase of the French Revolution. At least, it seems logical to me that, because Henry Drummond Jr. (and those of his inner circle) wished to rule Europe via his 12 Apostles, that he would have wanted all monarchs reduced to a powerless condition. And wasn't that very squelching of powers the Europe-wide task of the Illuminati?
Over and above Europe, Drummond and his associates desired a ruler in Jerusalem conditioned by and obedient to Illuminati principles (the topic of the next chapter). One can only fathom one picture in all of this: a counterfeit Biblical Millennium.
It is interesting that modern Zionism is seen for the first time in Napoleon's announcement to establish a sovereign Jewish state in Palestine (1799)...just as Nathan Rothschild arrived to England. One could get the impression that the Rothschilds were working with and supporting Napoleon, and vice versa...in the beginning, anyway. And why not, for Napoleon was not only the ruler of the French Revolution at that time, but -- in the beginning, anyway -- was counted among the Jacobins. Many writers tell that Nathan Rothschild fed Napoleon with money to facilitate his rise to power. Thus, we can see the spawning of Rothschild Zionism in Napoleon.
Eventually, however, Napoleon swept France of Jacobin powers and opted for other supporters. The emperor is therefore to me a type of anti-Christ who betrays the Illuminati plan for world rule. Thomas Jefferson was wildly open in his attacks on the French dictator, Frankfurt became the "capital" city in opposing him, Nathan Rothschild secured English monies in opposition, and Mayer's boss, William IX of Hesse-Cassel, had to flee from him. Thus, after Napoleon's fall in 1815, the Illuminati had to look elsewhere for agents willing to procure Zionism, and without surprise we find one of those agents in Henry Drummond Jr., who, as I said, just happened to have a religious experience merely two years later in 1817. The other agents are found working alongside Drummond in the "Jews' Society."

The Jews' Society
We know that Henry Drummond hooked up to the Jew Society,
but did you know that this organization was
led by globalists and Freemasons?

No comments: