Look up, your redemption is at hand: THE TRINITY

Look up, your redemption is at hand: THE TRINITY

THE TRINITY
By
A IbrahimThe Bible categorically pronounces that there is only one God!
Jesus:..."Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one."(Mark 12:29, or Romans 3:29-30, James 2:19)The Quran too testifies that Jews and Christians, the people of the Book, believe in one God:
And dispute ye not with the
People of the Book, except
with means better (than mere
disputation), unless it be with
those of them who inflict wrong
(and injury); But say, "We
believe in the Revelation which
has come down to us and in that
which came down to you; Our God
and your God is One; and it is
to Him we bow (in Islam)."
(Surah 29, Al 'Ankabut, verse 46)
CLARIFYING MISUNDERSTANDINGS
The blasphemous idea of Christians worshipping three gods comes from a wrong understanding of the Trinity. In the fifth century AD there was a Christian cult called Maryanya which spread the false belief that Jesus and his mother Mary would be two separate gods besides God. The Quran was right to speak out against such impiety:
And behold! Allah will say: "O
Jesus, the son of Mary, didst
thou say unto men, 'Worship me
and my mother as gods in
derogation of Allah?' He will
say: 'Glory to Thee! Never
could I say what I had no right
(to say). Had I said such a
thing, Thou wouldst indeed have
known it. Thou knowest what is
in my heart, though I know not
what is in Thine. For Thou
knowest in full all that is
hidden.'"
(Surah 5 Al Ma'idah, verse 116)
To say, as the minority cult of the Maryanyas did, that Mary was the mother of God through whom He produced a physical son, and both were to be taken as separate gods besides God, is absurd! This ludicrous and heathen concept of the Trinity is completely condemned by both Islam and Christianity! The Quran rejects it in clear terms in Surah 4, Al Nisa, verse 171. The triads of gods worshipped by pagans are always three separate gods, not one God. In addition to this big difference to the Biblical concept of Trinity, non-Christian Trinitarian beliefs are mostly three gods at the top of a list of many other gods.
The Trinity has also been misunderstood to mean that God is three persons and only one person at the same time and in the same sense. Neither are there three substances in one substance.
EXPLORING THE TRUE CONCEPT OF TRINITY
A. Biblical facts as basis for Trinity
While the word 'Trinity' does not appear in the Bible the concept of it is quiet clearly taught throughout its pages. Similarly, the Muslim Creed, known as 'Kalimah' does not occur in the Quran. The whole sentence is put together from two different Surahs. Muslims call Allah "El Adl", meaning "the Just", "El Wajid", meaning "The Inventor or Maker", "Edh Dhur", meaning "the harmful", etc. based on the list of the 99 names of God. However these words are nowhere found in the Quran but Muslims still accept these attributes as belonging to God. (see "The Muslim doctrine of God", by S.M. Zwemer, American tract Society, 1905, pages 39-45)
Let us now examine the verses in the Bible upon which the teaching of the Trinity is built.
Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one.Love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength.
(Deuteronomy 6:4-5)Firstly we need to look at the definition of the word 'one'. 'The idea is not, Jehovah (later translated as 'LORD') our God is one (the only) God, but 'one Jehovah'...(it) simply states that it is to Him alone that the name Jehovah rightfully belongs, that He is the one absolute God, to whom no other Elohim can be compared. This is also the meaning of the same expression in Zechariah 14: 9, 'Jehovah will be king over the whole earth. On that day there will be one Jehovah, and His name one' where the words added 'and His name one,' can only signify that in the future Jehovah would be acknowledged as the one absolute God, as King over all the earth' (Keil-Delitsch Commentary)
'The word used for 'one' is the ordinary Hebrew numeral. God is all on his own. He has no 'relations'. As far as his Godhead is concerned he is alone, unique.... Some passages use plural forms for God. One form of the name for God, Elohim, is itself plural. This is remarkable in view of the Old Testament emphasis on the unity of God. It cannot be explained as a plural of 'majesty'; this was entirely unknown to the Hebrews. It has been seen as on a level with the words for 'water' and 'heaven', which both also happen to be in the plural in Hebrew. Water can be thought of in individual raindrops or in terms of the mass of water in the ocean. The plural in this case points to 'diversity in unity'. Some believe that the same is true of the plural 'Elohim. But there are also passages where God speaks of himself in the plural. We find them in particular in the first chapters of Genesis. 'God said, ''Let us make man in our image, after our likeness...'' and, 'The Lord God said, ''Now the man has become like one of us...'' But we find it also in Isaiah's vision: 'And I heard the voice of the Lord saying, ''Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?'' ' (Lion Bible, article on , 'The Trinity in the Bible' by Klaas Runia)
The following verses teach also that Jehovah, God the Holy Trinity is His own community built upon a loving relationship as the essence of reality. It brings forth a perfect and beautiful unity:
'In the beginning God ('elohim',plural, the Father) created ('bara' singular verb) the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. And God said, (God the Son who is known as His word in John 1:1 through whom he created all things according to Colossians 1:16) "Let there be light," and there was light.'(Genesis 1:1-3)
'Draw near to me, hear this: from the beginning I have not spoken in secret, from the time it came to be I have been there. And now the Lord GOD has sent me and his Spirit.'
(Isaiah 48:16)Ultimately, these verses find their fulfilment in Jesus (John 10:36, Luke 4:1,14,18)
'I will tell of the kindness of the LORD, the deeds for which he is to be praised, according to all the LORD has done for us - yes, the many good things he has done for the house of Israel, according to his compassion and many kindness. He said, "Surely they are my people, sons who will not be false to me"; and so he became their Saviour. In all their distress he too was distressed, and the angel of his presence saved them. In his love and mercy he redeemed them; he lifted them up and carried them all the days of old. Yet they rebelled and grieved his Holy Spirit. So he turned and became their enemy and he himself fought against them.'(Isaiah 63:7-10)There are a number of verses in the New Testament that call Jesus and the Holy Spirit God, besides God the Father. (John 8:58, compare with Exodus 3:14; Acts 5:3-4 etc.) In the light of this truth the following verses are understood to be speaking about the Trinity:
'And when Jesus was baptised, he went up immediately from the water, and behold, the heavens were opened and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and alighting on him; and lo, a voice from heaven, saying, "This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased."(Matthew 3:16-17)
Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name (singular!) of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,...
(Matthew 28:19)
May the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all.
(2 Corinthians 13:13)
'Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the elect who are sojourners of the Dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, in sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace to you and peace be multiplied.'
(1 Peter 1:1-2)In Acts 2:38, 8:16, 19:4 People are baptised in the name of Jesus only. Since Jesus is now included in a way he was not in John's baptism (19:4), the abbreviated form is used in the beginning to emphasise the distinctive quality of the new baptism. For more verses speaking about the Trinity when one considers the Biblical context see, Ephesians 4:4-6, 5:18-20, 1 Cor 12:4-6, Romans 8:9-11.
B. Doctrine of Trinity explained
The word 'Trinity' is derived from the Latin 'trinitas,' being a combination of the words 'tri' for 'three' and 'unitas' for 'unity.' The Christians definition of Trinity based on verses like the above is expressed in the Athenasian Creed:
'We worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity; Neither confounding (mixing up) the Persons; nor dividing the Substance (Essence)'The word 'Person' is here used in the sense of 'self with a particular function.' ('The Illustrated Bible Dictionary' by F.F. Bruce, IVP Leicester, 1962, see 'person') It has to be stated emphatically that Christians do not worship three gods but one God because '...each member of the Godhead in some sense indwells the other, without diminishing the full person hood of each. The essential unity of the Godhead, then, is found both in their intrinsic equality of divine characteristics and also in the intensely personal unity that comes from mutual indwelling.' ('The self-giving triune God, the imago dei and the nature of the local church: an ontology of mission', paper by J. Scott Horrell, Th.D, professor of Systematic Theology at Dallas Theological Seminary)
Thus when God the Son died at the cross, God did not cease to exist but was separated from himself regarding the relationship within the Trinity not regarding his essence. To think that God gave up a perfect relationship for a time shows how great his love towards us is!
The main stream of Christianity throughout all the world believes in one God, the Holy Trinity. It is indeed a mystery, as God Himself is. Many attributes of Him are accepted by both Muslims and Christians, yet are simply not fully comprehensible to the human mind. We all accept that God has no beginning, yet do we understand this? The common question asked by children, 'If God made everything, who made God?' is just as puzzling to adults. Muslims and Christians believe that God is independent of space and time, yet how on earth can we satisfactorily explain how this might be? How is it that God can be nearer to us than our most secret thought, yet be this for the billions of other people on earth just as much simultaneously? These confusing facts apply also to all people in history and the times to come. 'Impossible!' the sceptic cries out, yet true. Then why should it be such a problem if there is some aspect of God's essential nature (his Trinitarian existence) which is difficult for us to grasp? Someone said, 'if you can understand it then be sure it is not God.' Both, the Bible and the Quran speak about God anthropomorphically (human terms are used to describe him). Orthodox Muslims do not explain the "how". Similarly, it is a fact that God's word was revealed in a book, but how the infinite can be expressed in the finite is not clarified.
"It is held that although the doctrine is beyond the grasp of human reason, it is, like many of the formulations of physical science, not contrary to reason, and may be apprehended though it may not be comprehended by the human mind." (See, "Encyclopaedia Americana", "Trinity", by F.C. Grant, Danbury, Con.: Americana Corp., 1980) The Trinity of God, like many other facts about him does not have to be understood fully, but to be believed in. Faith, the simple childlike trust that God is and acts as he revealed himself in the Bible, is sufficient for salvation. Similarly, one does not have to understand how a Television set works in order to enjoy a programme about nature. A simple touch of the right button will bring about the blessing.
The danger one faces when confronted with extreme or complicated ideas, is, "to throw the baby out with the bath-water," this means to reject everything about a matter, even the true and the good. Here is what C.S. Lewis, professor of Medieval and Renaissance literature at Cambridge University has to say about such an attitude: 'If Christianity was something we were making up, of course we could make it easier. But it is not. We cannot compete, in simplicity, with people who are inventing religions. How could we? We are dealing with Fact. Of course anyone can be simple if he has no facts to bother about." ( 'Mere Christianity", Macmillan Company, New York, 1943, page 145)
C. Illustrations
When it comes to finding illustrations for the Trinity, to explain that which can be apprehended but not comprehended, one can easily fall into modalism. This is a false teaching holding that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit were three successive 'modes' in which the one God manifested himself to bring salvation to the world. It would mean that God the Father was made flesh, died, and rose from the dead. The Biblical teaching, however, is that Jesus, God the Son took on a human nature died and rose again from the dead. Jesus is a person, in the sense of self with a particular function, distinct from the Father and the Holy Spirit. The oneness is still maintained by stressing the fact that Father, Son and Holy Spirit are of the same substance or essence. As mentioned before each member of the Godhead is indwellt with the other which further confirms God's oneness. Keeping this important difference in mind, the following examples have to be viewed as applicable only in a limited way.
In trying to come to terms with this subtlety it will be helpful to realise that everything in this world consists of a kind of Trinity, namely substance, form and purpose! To put this statement to the test let us think of a pencil. Like everything else it is made out of a substance that is formed into something, in our case into a pencil. Its purpose is to enable people to write, in the same way as all other things have some purpose!
The geometric illustration of the Trinity is found in a triangle. The three corners are inseparable and simultaneous. The one that represents Jesus is touched by a circle that stands for his human nature, whereas the corner indicates his divine nature. (Philippians 2: 5 -11) Questions and apparent contradictions regarding Jesus being God (e.g. 'How can God eat, die, etc. like Jesus?") are easily solved by taking his two natures into consideration. What he did in one he did not in the other.
You, dear reader, have got a body, a soul and a spirit according to Hebrews 4:12. Yet, in spite of this you are unique, you are the only one who is like you in the whole wide world.
Nature is another example where we find diversity within unity. On one hand one can find nowhere a bigger variety. When God created flowers he did not just design red roses. There are countless different forms, shapes and colours. On the other hand is nature's unity evident in the fact that the extinction of one kind of animal effects many others.
St. Augustine compared the Trinity with love that involves a lover, the loved one and a spirit of love between them.
It may also be valuable to see the one universe as made of space, matter and time. Time by itself consists of  past, present and future. If any one of these is removed then universe and time will cease to be! Fire generates heat and light. Thus fire, with its light and heat is one thing that has different functions. Multiplicity in unity is a very common phenomena. This kind of spiritual unity which reflects the Biblical understanding of the Trinity is distinguished from mathematical unity where 1+1+1 = 3. In mathematical terms one could compare Trinity with 1 x 1 x 1 = 1.
'Further, some have pointed to the fact that Muhammad was simultaneously a prophet, a husband, and a leader. Why then should a Muslim reject the idea of a plurality of functions (persons) in God." ('Answering Islam", by N.L. Geisler&Abdul Saleeb) Baker Books U.S.A. 1993, page 269"
This brings us to another analogy for the truth of the Trinity, that of man's mind. He has one mind, which is capable of thinking thoughts and expressing them in words. Mind, thoughts and words are one. No one can say that God has no Mind that expresses itself in Thoughts and Words. God in Mind and Thoughts and Words is one God and He never claimed that there would be two other gods beside Him!
The Trinity of Christianity is truly representative of the Mind of God (commonly referred to as God the Father), His Thoughts, (commonly referred to as God the Holy Spirit) and His Word (commonly referred to as God the Son).
In the Gospel according to John we read:
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word (Greek: Logos) was God. He was with God in the beginning...The Word became flesh (in Jesus) and made his dwelling among us.(John 1:1,14)The context shows clearly that Jesus is God in the flesh: He was in the beginning, that means he is not created, he is eternal as God is eternal. Verse three states that through Jesus, the Word, all things were made, that means that he is God the Creator.
Some people have doubted that Jesus is really called God in this verse because in the Greek language the first word for "God", "ton theon" is different from the second, "theos". However in Greek it does not suggest this sort of shift in meaning. "This can be seen by reading other passages in the New Testament where "theos" appears in the same context both with and without the definite article, yet with no change in meaning (John 3:2, 13:3, Romans 1:21, 1 Thess. 1:9, Hebrews 9:14, 1 Peter 4:10-11). Whenever the word "theos" is used in the same construction, it always clearly refers to the true God (Mark 12:27, Luke 20:38, John 8:54, Phil. 2:13, Hebrews 11:16)" ("Why you should believe in the Trinity", by R.M. Bowman,Jr., Baker Book House, 1993, pages 93-94)
The "word" proceeds from the "mind". Both words derive their meaning from the Greek original "Logos". The word "Logos" has many meanings. One form "Logo" gives us the English "logic", which means not just ordinary speech (words), but mind expressed or intelligent expression.
God created the world by His intelligent Mind, or by His Thoughts, or by His Word, all of which mean the same. For God and His mind are the same being. An example of this is when we say, "We solved the problem with our minds." Is it us who solved it or our minds? Both are the same thing. This distinction between us and our mind is merely intellectual and does not involve separation but difference of function. Likewise, when we speak about God, His Mind of which His Thought and Word proceeds, we are not separating them, but only clarifying the issue.
In the Quran Jesus is called "a Word from God":
Behold! the angels said: "O
Mary! Allah giveth thee glad
tidings of a Word from Him; his
name will be Christ Jesus, the
son of Mary, held in honour in
this world and the Hereafter and
of (the company of) those
nearest to Allah; "
(Surah 3, Ali 'Imran, verse 45)
The English translation uses the relative pronoun "his" to render a masculine personal pronoun in the Arabic language. Since "Kalima" (Arabic for "word") is in the feminine gender it becomes clear that "a word" does not just mean "a word of language" but a person! We also find this clarified in the sayings of one of the Muslim scholars. ("Fusus al Hukm", Part II, pages 13,36, by Al Shaikh Muhyi al Din al 'Arabi)
The Bible speaks about the Holy Spirit being God:
Then Peter said, "Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit...You have not lied to men but to God."(Acts 5:3,4)In a similar way the Quran (Surah 4, Al Nisa, verse 171) speaks about Jesus being a Spirit proceeding from God! In other parts people are described as having been strengthened with a spirit from God (Surah 58, Al Mujadilah, verse 22). At the creation Allah has breathed into man of His spirit (Surah 15, Al-Hijr, verse 29), but Jesus only IS the Spirit from Allah!
This is why Islamic tradition calls Jesus "Ruhullah", that means "Spirit of Allah". Neither the Spirit of Allah (the Thoughts) nor the Word (the mind expressed) of Him can have been created since whatever proceeds from God Himself is part of Him and must therefore have existed eternally. If God was without Mind at any time He would not be God; or if he was without Thoughts at any time He would cease to be the Almighty One which is impossible! Muslim theology confirms this belief by stating that the Quran is uncreated and has existed in eternity with God. There again we find plurality within unity, something that is other then God but it is at the same time one with God.
D. Trinity answers difficult questions about the nature of God
The concept of God being a unique community within Himself stands in opposite to the Muslim concept of Allah being one in the strict numerical sense of the word. This Muslim understanding raises two questions:
1. 'How could Allah have been self sufficient and loving before the creation of angels and of the earth?' Since true love is always giving and Allah according to Islam is a lone God, according to logic there must have been  a time where he was incomplete, where he could not have had the attribute of love? However, according to both the Quran and the Bible, God has always been and always will be perfect.
2. 'Is Allah selfish?' Since love is described as having '...no envy;...no high opinion of itself,....no pride;...no thought for itself...(1 Corinthians 13: 4-5) some people like sceptic John Stuart Mill, Mark Twain or Pablo Picasso have come to the conclusion that God is utterly selfish. They say that by asking us to worship nobody else but God, he himself commits the sin of seeking glory for himself only for which he condemns man. While many Muslims would say that Allah, the creator can be selfish if he wants, Bible believing Christians find the answer to this apparent contradiction in the Trinitarian nature of God. He shares his glory among himself.
3. 'Is Allah limited?' Of course that can not be but he who thinks of God as an absolute unity where there is no room for multiplicity at all, is forced to believe in a god who does not know himself. Self-knowledge demands a distinction, a multiplicity, between knower and known. Only a Trinitarian concept of God allows for such a vital distinction..
E. Doctrine of Trinity held by early Christians
Tertullian, an early church father, used the word 'Trinity' the first time at the end of the 2nd century after the birth of Christ (AD) The Church adopted it as an official doctrine at the council of Nizea in 325 and in its final form at the council of Constantinople in 381 to defend Christianity against false teachings. (See also,'The Illustrated Bible Dictionary" by F.F. Bruce, IVP Leicester, 1962, 'Trinity")
However, the content of the Trinitarian doctrine has been believed in and taught about by Christian writers living before the council of Nizea already. They do not always reflect the general theological beliefs of common Christians of their day but nevertheless give some indication regarding doctrinal issues. Statements in support of the Trinity were made by:
Justin, martyred 165 AD: 'The Father of the Universe has a Son; who also, being the first-begotten Word of God, is even God.' (see, Justin Martyr, First Apology 63, in The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers down to A.D. 325, ed. Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson, rev.ed. A. Cleveland Coxe (Grand Rapids: William B. Eedmans Publishing Co., 1969 reprint, 1:184; hereafter cited as ANF.)
'Christians worship God the Father, the Son (who came forth from Him...), and the prophetic Spirit.' (Justin Martyr, First Apology 6 in ANF, 1:164)
Irenaeus, 130-200 AD: 'The Church has its faith in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are in them; and in one Christ Jesus, the Son of God, who became incarnate for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit, who proclaimed through the prophets the dispensations of God...Christ Jesus, is our Lord and God and Saviour, and King.' (Irenaeus, Against Heresies 1.10.1, in ANF, 1:330)
Clement of Alexandria, 200 AD: 'Christ is truly most manifest Deity, He that is made equal to the Lord of the universe; because He was His Son.' (Clement of Alexandria, Exhortation to the Heathen 10, in ANF, 2:202)

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES THE TRINITY MAKE IN MY LIFE?
At one stage in the growing up process of my daughter she developed a new phrase that soon became her favourite saying, thankfully only for a short time. When she was told to come in for dinner after play she would  often fearlessly proclaim, 'so what?' That was her way of saying, 'what you are saying is irrelevant to me. I want to continue playing outside.' She thought wrongly what we were asking her to do did not have any practical influence on her situation. Once convinced of the truth behind the Trinity many people still ask 'so what, this doctrine has no practical consequences for my life.' As we shall see, the Bible disagrees with such a hasty conclusion.
'So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. God blessed them and said to them, "Be fruitful and increase in number;'(Genesis 1:27-28)As an interesting detail the thought that all men originated from one kind was not known in the ancient world. Greeks called themselves 'Autochons,' 'made from the earth of Greece.' All others they called 'Barbarians,' 'foreigners.' The Jews, being eager to stress there uniqueness as people, would never have invented such a teaching that made them having the same ancestors as other people. Only because God said so they were willing to accept it without a full understanding. This proofs once more the accuracy of the Bible.
The passage above declares that we are created in God's image, in his likeness. The literal meaning of 'image', 'to shade' shows that man is not the same as God but similar in certain aspects, such as in his ability to think, feel and will. Even though badly damaged through sin, these are our God given tools to love and relate with him and each other.
Calvin, the French Theologian and Reformer said: 'Do you want to know God, get to know yourself. Do you want to know yourself get to know God (because we are made in his image).'
The word translated 'image' was used in ancient times by kings of the Near East to describe statues of themselves which were placed in all the main cities of their vast kingdoms. Because they could not be physically present everywhere, the kings images served as a reminder to everyone of their authority and rule. 'The statue was not the same as the king, but it represented the king and was due the same glory and honour. To dishonour the statue of the king was sacrilege, treason.' ('Intimate Allies' by Allender and Longman, Tyndale House Publishers, USA, 1995, page 18)
The Bible confirms this profound truth when it says what God is in big we are in small::
'When I consider your heavens, the work of your fingers, the moon and the stars, which you have set in place, :what is man that you are mindful of him, the son of man that you care for him? You made him a little lower than the heavenly beings (or, than God) and crowned him with glory and honour. You made him ruler over the works of your hands; you put everything under his feet.'(Psalms 8:3-6)
Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made man.' (Genesis 9:6)The command above is so radical because if we touch men, the image of God, in a sense we touch God! War in its various forms would cease if that principle was understood. What I do to my fellow beings I do to God in some ways. We either cultivate beauty or do harm. We must learn to look beyond the depravity and see the beauty of men. We are more glorious than a beautiful sunset. No matter what we do we therefore are still worth loving, even the worst criminal.
"The King will reply, `I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.' (Matthew 25:40)
Islam teaches to do good to our fellow beings in order to influence the scale of good and bad deeds positively so that perhaps one can go to heaven, if Allah wills. However, the real reason for treating them with dignity and importance is to bring glory and honour to God.
If man is created in God's image, similar to him, what practical lessons can we learn from the doctrine of the Trinity? How does it affect our daily lives?
1.Trinity teaches that relationships are most important in life
A loving relationship between God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit is at the heart of the Trinity. The Father loves the Son (Matthew 3:16-17), the Son submits to the Father (Luke 22:42) , the Holy Spirit brings honour and glory to Jesus. (John 16:14) Because we are made in God's image relationships must be our first priority in life. What is most important to us? Success in business? Riches, material things? Degrees? Knowledge? Health? Reputation? If they are more important than relationships then we sin and have to ask God for forgiveness.
A. Trinity makes passionate, personal relationship with God possible
Because sin is so severe and separates the Holy One from unholy men, God the Father sent God the Son to die for our sins on the cross. Without belief in the Trinity such a divine rescue operation would have been impossible. If God was One in the Muslim sense of the word who would have ruled the Universe during the time he died for us? Nobody and that can not be since God rules for ever. He who believes that Jesus died for his sin on the cross must believe in the Trinity. One can not believe one without the other. Only through the work of Jesus on the cross men is enabled to stand in the presence of the Holy God.
Andrei Roubliev, a Russian artist, has painted a most interesting picture. It depicts God's visitation to Abraham and Sarah in the form of three angels. (Genesis 18:1-8) One sees three men who are eating on a table. There is an empty space reserved for YOU! You are invited to enjoy the fellowship of God the Holy Trinity! We have a hard time to grasp such an incredible thought because when we think about God we stand in awe about the fact that he is One, Almighty, Powerful, having all things under his sovereign control. This is all true but it is only one side of the picture. God reveals himself not only as the sovereign One but also as having an intensive, passionate relationship within the Trinity. Through faith in Jesus and his works God invites us into a relationship as his children, who have the potential to become his grown up sons and daughters, his friends!
'And God raised us up with Christ and seated us with him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus, in order that in the coming ages he might show the incomparable riches of his grace, expressed in his kindness to  us in Christ Jesus. For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith - and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God - not by works, so that no-one can boast.'(Ephesians 2:6-9)
'His divine power has given us everything we need for life and godliness through our knowledge of him who called us by his own glory and goodness. Through these he has given us his very great and precious promises, so that through them you may participate in the divine nature and escape the corruption in the world caused by evil desires.'
(2 Peter 1:3-4)
'The life appeared; we have seen it and testify to it, and we proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and has appeared to us. We proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also may have  fellowship with us. And our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ.
(1 John 1:2-3)
Jesus: 'I no longer call you servants, because a servant does not know his master's business. Instead, I have called you friends, for everything that I learned from my Father I have made known to you.'
(John 15:15)Good friends treat each other as equals even though they may come from different backgrounds, have different jobs, and may not belong to the same social class. In spite of the differences their friendship unites them. Friends respect and listen to each other. Everyone is invited to share their opinions, feelings and ideas freely without having to fear they will be rejected as persons. Constructive criticism is allowed. Someone said, 'a friend is one who knows you as you are, understands where you have been, accepts who you have become, and still gently invites you to grow.' As incredible as it may sound but if we have become friends with God through faith in Jesus he offers us such a friendship! We are invited to participate in it! God rejoices over us and our uniqueness. In taking part in God's unity our being different from everyone else will honour and glorify him. It is true, we have not deserved to be treated in such a way, it is not our right but God offers his friendship as a privilege.
Of course, as friends of the perfect God we will make mistakes here on earth. However, God is so great that he can even turn around the bad and make it work for our good.
'And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose.'(Romans 8:28)God's will can be compared with a river. Within the river bed it will always find a way. Our sins and selfishness are like debris, stones and mud. They can not stop the river for ever. It will find a possibility to get  around the awkward hindrances. As long as we stay in the friendship with God he will finish the work he has started in us. (Philippians 1:6) Is that not good news indeed?
B. Trinity makes passionate, personal relationships with people possible
Relationships are absolutely vital for a healthy upbringing, in fact for our very survival as human beings. Babies, orphaned during the second world war died for a lack of attention. A small child who got lost in a French forest for years started to act like an animal. Similarly, sin, selfishness, is the single most devastating problem that mars relationships and cuts people off from each other. It turns their existence into a kind of hell on earth. Since God the Holy Trinity dealt with our rebellion against him, forgiveness is available through faith in Jesus. Only they who are forgiven by God can truly forgive others. Then God's ultimate goal for us becomes possible. In the Westminster Catechism it is described as, 'The chief end of man is to glorify God and to enjoy him forever.'
This happens when we who are made in God's image, (lit 'to shade') in his likeness (Genesis 1:26 ) reflect him by living in loving relationships with him and each other in marriage, family, the church and also the government.
Being made in God's image, whatever we do has to be a reflection of God's community, the Holy Trinity. God's goal is to reproduce His community:
Jesus said: "My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so  that the world may believe that you have sent me. I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one: I in them and you in me. May they be brought to complete unity to let the world know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.'(John 17:20-23)Only 10% of all leaders world wide finish well. The main thing that is going to help us finish well is community with God and with each other. Because we are fallen we are called to suffering in the process.
'For it is commendable if a man bears up under the pain of unjust suffering because he is conscious of God. But how is it to your credit if you receive a beating for doing wrong and endure it? But if you suffer for doing good and you endure it, this is commendable before God. To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps.'(1 Peter 2:19-21, see also verses 22-25 and Philippians 2:1-14)We must adopt this theology of suffering. Like the Russian Christian we should be surprised if we do not suffer! God allows suffering in our lives because he trusts us.
'And we, who with unveiled faces (we must take off our masks) all reflect (as a result of being real and honest not of doing) the Lord's glory, are being transformed into his likeness with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit. Therefore, since through God's mercy we have this ministry, we do not lose heart.'(2 Corinthians 3:18-4:1)We are called to enter the pain caused by living in a fallen community not to run from it. We are to stay in the 'tunnel of chaos until we bump into God.' As we do this we will learn to ask different questions about the same realities and we will be freed up to move more in our giftedness. Community with one another is sitting in the pain knowing that we can not fix it. By being loved in that way people are being freed up to be changed by God. An important issue is not to build up trust in each other only (John 2:24) but to get willing to open ourselves up to be hurt by others. Tears are an open door where others invite us to share their pain. When someone challenges us we should take what they say or do, unwrap it like a gift, examine it, rather than  react against it superficially. To do this we need solitude in God's presence. 'Lord, why do you allowed this to happen? What do you want me to learn?' We are to be accountable to each other regularly. If more than one person tells us the same we will be more likely to listen. If sinful patterns repeat themselves we have either not pursued each other enough to keep a superficial peace or rebellion against God takes place in peoples lives. In case of the latter, as a last resort because we live in a fallen world, separation will have to occur.
2. Trinity teaches that there is room for diversity within unity of marriage, family and Church,
The three Persons (in the sense of self with particular function) of the Trinity have different roles but the same goal, namely to enable us to enter into fellowship with God and to grow in that profound relationship. God the Father is the One who sends, God the Son is the One who saves and God the Holy Spirit is the One who lives in the Christian and helps him to grow spiritually. What a tremendous example of diversity within unity, one for us to follow. To do so we desperately need the help of God the Holy Spirit. Without him we are more drawn to people that are like us in terms of where they come from, what they do and who they are. Therefore, we are in danger of judging those who are different from us, even though they may still be within biblical boundaries. Quickly we are tempted to say, 'the way we do it is better.' Perhaps we should say, 'we are doing this differently, not necessarily better or worse.' Young Christians should not say 'the way we worship God with modern songs is better than how our fathers did it.' Our style of worship is just different, that is all. Especially when Christians come together for worship and service of God they are told to do so in diversity according to the giftedness of each. (See 1 Corinthians 12)
The same principle, that diversity contributes to the richness, the quality of our relationships, is also applicable in the areas of marriage, family, friends, relatives and at work. Developments where things are done differently but still to the glory of God should make us rejoice. We ought to support not try to hinder them out of fear. Oneness with the people we relate is important as long as we make room for others to be different if they choose to do so. In the beginning of life a child would like to be one and the same with his parents. At a later stage it also wants to be different to live out its own God given uniqueness. If someone experiences too much one and the sameness they feel uneasy and suffocated. He who does not feel enough unity will get lonely. These paradox desires are a sign of God's life in us.
3. Trinity teaches that mission originates naturally from it
Have you ever wondered why God created the world in the first place? Within the community of the Trinity he has absolutely no unmet needs. So why would he want to bother with creation and all the hassles we brought him through our rebellion against him? Could it be that he created the world and gave life to us as an overflow of his love existing within the Trinity? He who truly loves wants to give. That profound truth has to be at the heart of every missionary activity. The result of it is also a new creation. Those who believe in Jesus are born again. (John 3) They who know God the Holy Trinity personally, they who in whom God lives through his Holy Spirit, can not but tell others about Jesus. He said: 'For out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks.' (Matthew 12:34) Mission is at the very heart of God. It is his heart beat, the center of his life. What kind of place does the subject of mission take in our life? When have we last told others about Jesus?
4. Trinity teaches that there is no difference between life in general and spiritual life
Life originates from God the Holy Trinity who is life and from whom all forms of life begin. Therefore God is everywhere. He can be found in nature and in all other of his works.
Psalmist praying to God: 'You hem me in - behind and before; you have laid your hand upon me. Such knowledge is too wonderful for me, too lofty for me to attain. Where can I go from your Spirit? Where can I flee from your presence? If I go up to the heavens, you are there; if I make my bed in the depths, you are there. If I rise on the wings of the dawn, if I settle on the far side of the sea, even there your hand will guide me, your right hand will hold me fast. If I say, "Surely the darkness will hide me and the light become night around me," even the darkness will not be dark to you; the night will shine like the day, for darkness is as light to you.'(Psalms 139:5-12)
'From one man he made every nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he determined the times set for them and the exact places where they should live. God did this so that men would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us. `For in him we live and move and have our being.' As some of your own poets have said, `We are his offspring.' "Therefore since we are God's offspring, we should not think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone - an image made by man's design and skill.'
(Acts 17:26 -29)The teaching that God is everywhere is Biblical as can be seen from the passages above. New Age ideologies too believe that God is everywhere. Whereas according to those teachings God is equal to nature and is confined to it, Jews and Christians believe that God exists not just in his works but his presence far transcends, exceeds his creation. Therefore Christians do not worship the creation because God is much bigger than it. The consequences of this truth have the potential to revolutionise our daily lives! Since God is present everywhere we can fellowship and enjoy him during our love for mountain climbing, country rambling, swimming, just as much as in a Church service. All these forms of life are having God, the Holy Trinity as a source. His being can not be boxed and put in different categories, such as general life and spiritual life. Therefore we can worship him in and through everything good, be it while reading the Bible, praying, working on the computer, cleaning dishes, working in a factory, looking after children and so on. What a liberating truth! In case you would rather like to go for a walk then to a Church service you do not need to feel guilty. Out in the fresh air you can experience the all present God just as much if only you keep your eyes and ears attentive to him. Of course, everything has got its time. The ideal thing is doing one without neglecting the other. God, who lives in all his works and far beyond wants us to enjoy them and by doing that, him as well. God created such a rich variety of things for us to delight in. That is why we read in 1 Timothy 6:17:
'Command those who are rich in this present world not to be arrogant nor to put their hope in wealth, which is so uncertain, but to put their hope in God, who richly provides us with everything for our enjoyment.'5. Trinity teaches that a passionate live is possible
Within the community of the Holy Trinity God passionately feels, thinks, speaks and wills and works. These signs of life are naturally found in his creation too, especially in man who is created in God's image as male and female. It follows that our passions are a sign of God's life in us. As a result of sin those intense desires have sadly been subject to the likelihood of distortion and perversion. Our longing to be unique, to do  something special is God given. But if we live it out wrongly we are in danger of becoming proud and selfish. God has put the desire in us to love and to be loved. Lived out in an ungodly way it can turn into lust, being overbearing, acting in a dictatorial manner, controlling. Nevertheless, the root of our passion is still God given. C.S. Lewis, a professor of Medieval and Renaissance literature at Cambridge University put it in this way: '...wickedness, when you examine it, turns out to be the pursuit of some good in the wrong way...badness is only spoiled goodness. And there must be something good first before it can be spoiled...All the things which enable a bad man to be effectively bad are in themselves good things-resolution,  cleverness, good looks, existence itself.' ('Mere Christianity', New York, Macmillan, 1943, pages 49-50) These thoughts are confirmed by the teaching of Christianity that Satan was originally created by God as an angel. Since everything else brought into being by God was good in the beginning, he too only became evil, a fallen angel, after his rebellion against God. Inspite of the dangers that lie in a passionate life we must not avoid it all together. After all we do not stop eating just because we are in danger of eating too much food.
The following teaching of our Lord in Matthew 16:24 has often been misunderstood to mean one should not live a passionate life:
'Then Jesus said to his disciples, "If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will find it.'To deny ourselves does mean to say 'no' to our wishes and desires if they go against the wishes and desires of Jesus. Yes, God's unity demands that we are one with him in saying 'no' to evil and selfishness. But God's holy Trinity equally asks us to say 'yes' to our good passions, to that what makes us unique, what differentiates us from others. If you love playing chess and you are good at it, then use that passion for God's glory. How? By  passing on the praise people give you to God in telling them about him. Have you got a passion for dress making, sowing, knitting? Do not feel guilty if you spend hours on doing that. Use your gift for God's glory by telling others about his goodness, perhaps also by giving the finished product to someone as a gift. Do you love football, cricket, tennis? Then use these passions to praise God. How? By enjoying them and by building relationships with others in order to share your passion for God with them. If we say 'no' to our good passions we actually sin because then we say 'no' to God who is the source of all passion.
When we submit ourselves to the King of kings, the source of all our passions, he will enable us to live with unfulfilled desires too. God who is at the root of our passions is more important than their fulfilment.Therefore we can rejoice about the good things we desire without always having to consume them. Those of us who live in rich countries where everything is set towards instant satisfaction will find this truth particularly helpful.
In view of the fact that God is at the source of all passion we can even learn from our bad desires. Let me give you an example: A Christian went to a retreat centre to spend a few quiet days reading the Bible and praying. In the evenings participants were invited to share what they had learnt during the day. One day the poor soul had to fight a lot against sexual temptation and lustful thoughts. Once he pulled himself together to share about all this he expected his counsellor to say something like: 'If you really want to grow in spiritual maturity you have to rid yourself of such thoughts.' Much to his surprise he got this response: 'The sheer intensity of your temptation are a weak indication of how much God passionately loves you.' That is an unusual way to learn about God's intensive love for us from the source of passion that later turned bad.
5. A) Message of the Gospel enables us to have good passions
At the center of the gospel message is the proclamation that God loves us. (John 3:16) Sin, our rebellion against him, has spoiled the privilege of having a loving relationship with our maker. In his love he prepared a way for us to be restored again into fellowship with him by sending Jesus, God the Son, into this world to die for our sins. The punishment for our rebellion is death, separation, as seen above. Human beings are absolutely powerless to bear a sentence that is so radical because of God's holiness. In his perfection he must not have a relationship with imperfection otherwise he would cease to be God which is impossible. Whoever believes that Jesus died for their sins on their behalf will be saved from hell, the eternal separation from the Lord. They experience cleansing from evil passions in a unique, almost unbelievable way:
Jesus said: "If you love me, (based on the context one could also say 'if you believe in me') you will obey what I command. And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Counsellor to be with you for ever - the Spirit of truth. The world cannot accept him, because it neither sees him nor knows him. But you know him, for he lives with you and will be in you. I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you. Before long, the world will not see me any more, but you will see me. Because I live, you also will live. On that day you will realise that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you. Whoever has my commands and obeys them, he is the one who loves me. He who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I too will love him and show myself to him." Then Judas (not Judas Iscariot) said, "But, Lord, why do you intend to show yourself to us and not to the world?" Jesus replied, "If anyone loves me, he will obey my teaching. My Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him. "'(John 14:15-23)Can you imagine, the Almighty God, creator of heaven and earth, the Holy Trinity, promises to dwell in all those who put their faith in what Jesus has done at the cross! God lives in them, similarly as the three persons of the Trinity indwell each other without diminishing the full person hood of each. To have such a friend in one's life will naturally lead to a perfect peace but also to chaotic circumstances at times. It is encouraging to know that these crises too are a sign of new eternal life. Now, with the help of God who lives in the believer, he gets the strength to say 'no' to bad passions. He can also say 'no' to good passions if they hurt others or if it is too early to express them. That gospel is truly good news!

Sheik Imran Hosein on Western Culture and Final Eschatology

The primary flaw here in Sheik Hosein's exegesis is to claim that the Qur'an says that Our Lord Jesus Christ was not Crucified. He was and rose again and that is, in fact, stated in the Gospels and the Qur'an. It was as both the Gospels and the Qur'an both tell us a living death, i.e. He saw no corruption in the grave and took His body healed and glorified to heaven with Him at His ascension. The interpretations of the Hadiths are what varies from this. The Hadiths are NOT mandatory for Muslims, only the Qur'an is. The Qur'an of course admonishes Muslims to revere the Old and New Testaments as the word of God as well with the Qur'an. If properly interpreted, neither the Old and New Testaments nor the Qur'an contradict one another.

All three of the below call the Lord Jesus Christ the ONLY Messiah sent by God.

For treatment of Christian belief see: The Catholic Creed

For treatment of Muslim belief see: The Final Trial

For treatment of belief of Jews called in Christ see: Jews called in Christ


The Final Eschatology revealed by the Messiah, the Risen Lord Jesus Christ: The Apocalypse, the Book of the Revelation

2012 : Consider Yourself Already Dead

Antwort an SOS-Heimat « Kawther Salam

Antwort an SOS-Heimat « Kawther Salam

Antwort an SOS-Heimat

Die Websites SOS-Heimat und erstaunlich.at haben Artikel über mich veröffentlicht, in denen sie mich mit Hitler gleichsetzen und mich mit Hass überschütten weil ich Kritik gegen Israel äussere und weil ich positiv über Treffen zwischen der Moslemischen Gemeinde in Wien und Österreichischen Politikern berichte. Ich habe ihnen folgendes per Email geschrieben.

Liebes SOS-Heimat Team,

Sie haben einen Artikel über mich und meine Website veröffentlicht. Ich möchte mich zuerst recht herzlich für die Paar Besucher bedanken, die mich von Ihrer Website aus erreicht haben. Ich schreibe Ihnen aber weil Ihre nicht den Tatsachen entsprechende Behauptungen über mich nicht unwidersprochen lassen will.

Hierbei beziehe ich mich sowohl auf den von Ihnen veröffentlichten Artikel, wie auch auf den Artikel auf der Website “erstaunlich.at“, den ich mit Ihrem Artikel in Verbindung sehe.

Die Auserwählte Anat Cohen verprügelt mich auf der Straße in Hebron (1999)

Ich will mich kurz vorstellen. Mein Name ist Kawther Salam, meine Heimat ist in Hebron, Palästina, und ich bin von Beruf Journalistin. Ich musste vor inzwischen 9 Jahren fliehen, ich bin nach Österreich geflohen. Im Jahr 2002 hatte eine Gruppe von israelischen Soldaten bereits 5 Jahren auf meinem Dach hausiert. Sie haben mein Haus zerstört, mich dauernd verprügelt und sexuell belästigt (ich habe über 300 Anzeigen bei der israelischen Polizei eingebracht), Drogen konsumiert, die Nächte durchgesoffen, homosexuell koitiert, meine Nachbarin in ihrem eigenen Schlafzimmer begrapscht, meinen Nachbarn vor meinen Augen auf der Treppe ermordet weil er seine Frau verteidigen wollte, Passanten erschossen, willkürlich und aus Jux und Dollerei mit MG und 40mm Granaten in die Nachbarschaft geschossen, usw.

Soldat bricht mein Handgelenk

Ich war den Besatzern ein Dorn im Auge weil ich dauernd über die Verbrechen der “Siedler” berichtete, Amerikanische Kolonisten extremisten die sich in meiner Heimat breit machen, und der Soldaten. Das detachment des Militärs auf meinem Dach war dazu abgestellt mir das Leben unmöglich zu machen. Zuletzt wurde mir vom Israelischen Kommandanten der illegalen und verbrecherischen Besatzung verboten, Hebron, meine Heimatstadt, zu betreten. Ich konnte eine Weile bei Bekannten, aber es war nur eine Frage der Zeit bis mich die Schergen der Israelischen Geheimdienste erwischt hätten. Als ich zum letzten Mal entgegen dem Befehl der israelis in Hebron war, hatten die Besatzer mein Haus vollkommen geplündert und zerstört. Das ist, wovon ich fliehen musste.

Soldaten hausieren auf meinem Dach

Im Gesetz vieler Länder, auch Österreich, hat das was ich erlebte einige sehr hässliche Namen. Unter anderem nennt man das Völkermord, Ethnische Säuberung, Kriegsverbrechen, Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit, Plünderung, Staatsterrorismus, … und das ist, wogegen ich schreibe, und mir ist kein Gesetz bekannt das mich dazu zwingt, mich mit dem Status eines Opfers zufrieden zu geben und es den Verbrechern die mir alles gestohlen haben zudem noch mit meinem Schweigen leicht zu machen. Als Opfer von Genozid und Vertreibung ist es mein Recht, meine Pflicht, die Täter anzuklagen und mein möglichstest zu tun um zu meinem Recht zu kommen und für mich und meine Leute, und sogar für die israelische Zivilisten, Gerechtigkeit und Frieden durchzusetzen.

Die Blumen der israelischen Soldaten auf meinem Dach

Meine Frage an Sie: Im angenommenen Fall, eine Gruppe von Ausländern würde sich ein beliebiges Haus im 1. Wiener Bezirk aussuchen, die Bewohner kurzerhand rauswerfen oder gleich ermorden, und wenn nach ihrem Recht gefragt behaupteten, das Haus hätte ihnen eh schon immer gehört (und der 1. Bezirk sowieso) und diese Behauptung mit Hilfe von roher und brutaler Gewalt, der Macht der Waffen, mit gefälschten Dokumenten und der Fälschung der Geschichte des 1. Bezirks untermauerten, und wenn diese Ausländer, um sich vor der verständlichen Reaktion der restlichen Bewohner Wiens zu schützen den gesamten 1. Bezirk mit 5000 Soldaten besetzten, Scharfschützen in allen Strassen postierten, “Checkpoints” alle 50 Meter aufstellten an denen “einfach so” Frauen belästigt werden, Männer verprügelt, gedemütigt oder ermordet werden und wo alle von Kindesalter an zur Kollaboration erpresst werden, wenn Männer, Frauen und Kinder jeden Alters immer damit rechnen müssen entführt zu werden und in den  Internierungsstätten gewöhnlich vergewaltigt und gefoltert werden, wenn, kurz gesagt, der 1. Bezirk zu einem KZ seiner rechtmässigen Einwohner unfunktioniert würde, wie in Hebron, um schwerwiegendes Unrecht und Verbrecher zu schützen.

• Wie wäre Ihre Reaktion auf solche Zustände?
• Wäre es dann “Terrorismus” wenn Sie gegen diese Besatzer und ihre Verbrechen aufbegehrten?
• Wäre es dann “Hetze” wenn Sie zum Boykott dieser Besatzer aufriefen?
• Würden Sie den Besatzern nach jedem Schlag, nach jeder geschossenen Kugel, nach jeder Vergewaltigung, nach jedem ethnisch gesäuberten Haus und Strassenzug laut “Danke” singen und dabei die Stiefel der Besatzer lecken?
• Ist es das, wofür “SOS-Heimat” steht? Denn das ist  anscheinend was von mir verlangt wird.

Blumen kann man nicht als schrecklich bezeichnen, und das schreckliche kann man nicht eine Blume nennen

Erstaunlich finde ich, dass ich gerade jetzt zum Ziel Ihrer Kritik werde. Ich schreibe inzwischen seit 9 Jahren über die Fakten der israelischen Besatzung auf dieser Website, zum Teil mit sehr harten Worten, aber das ist anscheinend nicht der Anlass Ihrer Kritik. Ich vermute, dass es sich um etwas viel gravierenderes als meine Tätigkeit der letzten 9 Jahre handelt. Ich vermute, dass meine grosse Sünde die ist, mit höflichen Worten über einfache und symbolische Akte der Verständigung zwischen Muslimischen Einwanderern und der etablierten Politik zu berichten. Als Muslimische Frau die kein Kopftuch trägt, die Religiöse Äusserungen meidet, die sich nach Möglichkeit respektvoll gegenüber Österreich und seinen Menschen und Sitten zeigt und positiv über das offizielle und infoffizielle Österreich schreibt genüge ich kaum den Clichees die es bestimmten Gruppen leicht machen, sich bei jedem Anlass gehässig über Muslime zu äussern. Wo wären solche schäbigen Hassgruppen wenn ihnen ihre Feindbilder abhanden kämen?

Freude, Umarmungen, Küsse, und Masturbation der israelischen Soldaten in Hebron. Sie wollten unbedingt von mir fotografiert werden.

Sie setzen mich gleich mit Hitler. Das ist der übliche Schwachsinn, der dauernd von den in Hebron ansässigen Amerikanischen Kolonisten laut gebrüllt wird, gegen alles und jeden der ihnen nicht passt – also alle die keine jüdische Extremisten sind – alle sind “Hitler”. Wir Palästinenser sind “Hitler”, amerikanische Juden die Hebron besuchen aber nicht ihre extremistische Haltung teilen sind “Hitler”, Präsident Obama ist “Hitler” jedes Mal wenn er etwas gegen ihre Interessen sagt, die EU-Abgeordneten die Hebron besuchen sind “Hitler”.

Feeling the Love in Jerusalem from Joseph Dana on Vimeo.

Dabei weiss jeder, dass Hitler kein Palästinenser war. Und jeder weiss, dass wir Palästinenser nichts mit den Verbrechen des Naziregimes zu tun haben oder hatten. Und abgesehen davon, dass die Gleichsetzung Ehrenrührig ist, stimmt sie nicht. Vielmehr stimmt es, dass wir Palästinenser die letzten Opfer der Nazi Diktatur sind, denn seit 70 Jahren zahlen wir mit unserem Hab und Gut, mit unserer Gesundheit und unserem Leben, mit unserer Existenz, für die Verbrechen der Nazis. So wird seit 70 Jahren von den zionisten alles daran gesetzt unser Recht darauf als Mensch behandelt zu werden, auf unsere Heimat, zu verneinen, vertuschen, verhindern. So wird seit 70 Jahren von Tätern als Opfer geredet, von Opfer als Terroristen oder “zweibeinigen Krokodilen”, von Verbrechen als Verteidigung … Wenn wir Palästinenser uns äussern wird geschwiegen, werden wir lächerlich gemacht oder angeschwärzt und eingesperrt, und wenn das auch nichts nutzt, werden wir ermordet, gefoltert, verprügelt, und immer wieder werden wir Terroristen genannt (und “Hitler” eben).

Soldat, der Seine Hintern der Welt zeigt. Klicken Sie auf das Foto. Quelle: CPT

Sie nennen meine Schriften “hetzerisch” und führen ein “viertes Reich” ins Treffen. Weiter machen Sie meine Berichte über die Iftar-Treffen verächtlich, nennen die Teilnehmer daran “Radikale Vertreter des Islam” und, “erstaunlich.at” soll mich beim Verfassungsschutz wegen “Israelfeindlichkeit” gemeldet haben. Es gibt meines Wissens nach keinen Straftatbestand “Israelfeindlichkeit”, und nach Durchsicht meiner Schriften und des Österreichischen StGB sehe ich keine Berührung mit § 283 oder anderen Bestimmungen darin. Ich finde es jedenfalls positiv dass Sie diese Angelegenheit so für die Öffentlichkeit geöffnet haben. Die Zeit ist längst überfällig, die Verbrechen Israels einer breiteren Öffentlichkeit in Österreich bekannt zu machen, und ich kann sehr viel zu diesem Thema beitragen, es gibt Berge von unaufgearbeiteten Verbrechen Israels, alle schriftlich, in Bild oder Film dokumentiert, die in der Öffentlichkeit aufgerollt gehören.

Obervergewaltiger. Mit diesem Verbrecher habe ich eine offene Rechnung.

Wo wir schon über “hetzerisch” reden, meine Frage(n) an “erstaunlich.at”:

- Sehen Sie einen Zusammenhang zwischen “Üdmünd Sückbüer” und §283 (Verhetzung) StGB? Oder §111 oder §115 StGB?

- Sehen Sie einen Zusammenhang dazwischen, die Gäste des Bürgermeisters als “Radikale Vertreter des Islam” anzuschmieren und §111, §115 §283, StGB?

- Sehen Sie einen Zusammenhang zwischen Ihrer Unterstellung gegen die Gäste des Iftar-Abends mit Bürgermeister Häupl, sie würden ein 4. Reich einführen und Juden aus Österreich vertreiben wollen, und §111, §115, §117, §283 StGB?

Laut dem was ich gesehen habe, sind gerade jene Menschen, die seitens der Muslimischen Vereine zu diesen Iftar-Treffen gekommen sind jene, die man am wenigsten “Radikal” nennen kann, vielmehr sind es jene die um gute Beziehungen mit Österreich, seinen Menschen und Institutionen bemüht sind. Unter ihnen sind viele Gewerbetreibende, Ärzte, Ingenieure, Professoren usw. die sich auch für Österreich einsetzen und die ohne die Zustimmung ihrer Österreichisch-Christlichen Umgebung gar nicht dort wären, wo sie heute sind.

Sie unterstellen mir weiter “antisemitismus”. Als Palästinenserin bin ich angehörige eines Semitischen Volkes und daher Semitisch, und nicht umgekehrt. Korrigieren Sie bitte Ihre nicht zutreffende Behauptung.

Sie behaupten, ich würde zum Boykott gegen Israel und daher zum Boykott gegen “alle Juden” aufrufen. Das ist gleich öfters falsch. Ihre Behauptung setzt Israel und “alle Juden” gleich. Israel ist ein politisches Gebilde gegen das es legitim und legal ist, zu Boykotts aufzurufen. Israel ist eine Besatzung unter der ich seit meiner Kindheit leben musste. Die Juden, die ausserhalb Israels leben sind kein Thema, sie tun mir sogar leid weil ich sehe, wie Israel ihren Ruf schädigt.

Anat Cohen gibt eine politische Rede

Die Muslime sind das Problem

Als Palästinenserin kenne ich die Litanei und die Maschen der Besatzung und ihrer Freunde und Freunderl sehr gut: Palästinenser sind Terroristen schon wenn wir im Bauch der Mutter sind, wir sind so schrecklich dass man unseren Namen nicht nennen darf; wenn israelis eine schwangere Palästinenserin abknallen ist es ein Anlass der Freude; die Araber sind alle nur Palästinenser die anders heissen, sie sind Gewaltbereit und essen viel Knoblauch; die Muslime sind alle Islamisten und man sollte sie alle am besten nach Guantanamo verfrachten, sie wollen Europa erobern und hassen die Christen, “Takiya” bedeutet, dass man seinen Glauben und Absichten verbergen muss, wenn Muslime was freundliches tun sind sie dabei, Verbrechen zu vorbereiten und wenn ein Muslim ein Verbrechen begeht sind gleich alle daran Schuld, wenn Muslime (Palästinenser) vor den Gräueltaten der Besatzer und der vom Westen installierten Diktaturen in ihren Ländern fliehen, dann geht es ihnen eh nur darum, sich im Westen unter Vortäuschung politischer Probleme alimentieren zu lassen, wenn es einem Arabischen Land zu gut geht muss man es in die Steinzeit zurückbomben weil “Die eine Gefahr” darstellen, das Problem ist der Islam und überhaupt sind Muslime hassenswerte Untermenschen usw. usf. … alles bewährte und faktenfreie Argumentationslinien direkt aus den Handbüchern der Hasbara, der Kolonialbesatzer, der Nazis.

Und genau das findet sich auf SOS-Heimat, erstaunlich.at und andere vor Hass triefende Websites deren Authoren zwar vorgeben sich um ihre Heimat sorgen zu machen wegen offenkundiger politischer Fehentwicklungen, die aber nichts tun als Hass gegen Muslime zu predigen, und deren Inhalte wie aus einem Guss mit den Vorgaben der israelischen Hasbara sind.

Dass Sie den Gegner oder Feind mit Hasstiraden überhäufen deutet auf Ihr Unvermögen hin, sich politisch so zu äussern, dass sie bei mehr als einer radikalisierten Minderheit gehör finden, Sie daher zu immer schrilleren Tiraden greifen müssen um Ihren Standpunkt zu kommunizieren. Das nennt man Radikalisierung. Eine andere zulässige Interpretation Ihrer Hasstiraden ist aber auch die, dass es Ihnen und ähnlichen Websites gar nicht darum geht das Bestmögliche für Österreich in der politischen Ausseinandersetzung rauszuholen, sondern ausschliesslich darum, ohne Rücksicht auf Verluste unter dem Deckmantel des Patriotismus Hass gegen Muslime zu schüren. Das nennt man Verhetzung. Was genau Sie mit ihren Websites bezwecken, das wissen Sie hoffentlich besser als ich.

Dass Sie mich wegen Schriften die sich durchaus im Rahmen legitimer und legaler politischer Äusserung bewegen bei der Staatspolizei meldeten, deutet auf Ihr Unvermögen hin, politische Äusserung von Hetze zu unterscheiden oder unterscheiden zu wollen, dass Sie nicht in der Lage sind, andere Standpunkte als Ihren eigenen zu dulden. Eine eher eingeschränkte Sicht der Welt.

Der politische Kontrahent, in Ihrem Fall “Muslims”, wird mit einer solchen Einstellung zum Feind gemacht der vernichtet werden muss weil schon seine Existenz den eigenen Wert als Mensch in Frage stellt. Welch armselige Einstellung, wie hilflos muss sich jemand fühlen der so denkt und agiert.

Übrigens ist das Ansinnen, den politischen Gegner Mundtot machen zu wollen typisch für extrem radikalisierte Personen mit authoritären Persönlichkeitszügen. Vorausgesetzt die Gesellschaftliche Bedingungen passen, gehen solche Persönlichkeiten in der späterer Entwicklung ihres Zustandes dazu über, ihre politischen Gegner nicht nur Mundtot sondern auch Tot zu machen. Sie finden vielfach Verwendung als Mitläufer, Schergen, Folterer und Schreibtischtäter von faschistischen Regimes wie z.B. Die vielbemühte Nazidiktatur, wie Israel, wie die USA und die Diktaturen in der Arabischen Welt.

Ich wünsche Ihnen alles Gute für die Zukunft, vor allem aber wünsche ich Ihnen dass Sie mehr Zeit finden um über die Folgen von dem was Sie schreiben zu reflektieren und mehr Erfolg beim Überprüfen von Fakten und Hintergründen.

Liebe Grüsse,

Kawther

P.S. Ich werde diese Email an Sie auf meiner Website als Artikel veröffentlichen.

P.P.S. Folgendes dürfte Sie auch interessieren:

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/2009/12/15/austria-genocide-charges-against-ehud-barak

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/2009/09/01/a-palestinian-child-against-israel-at-the-icc

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/2009/08/23/the-body-snatchers-of-israel

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/petitions/criminal-complaint

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/2008/03/25/letter-to-the-attorney-general-of-israel

http://www.kawther.info/ga2/v/Maslakh/

http://www.kawther.info/ga2/v/SoldierActivities/Dibi03.jpg.html

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/2008/11/27/petition-for-palestine

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/petitions/complanit-vs-dudi-cohen

Reply to SOS home

The websites SOS home and erstaunlich.at have published articles about me in which they equate me with Hitler and overwhelm me with hate because I express criticism against Israel, and because I report positively about meetings between the Muslim community in Vienna and Austrian politicians. I wrote them the following email.

Dear SOS home team,

You have an article published about me and my website. I first want to thank you very much for the pair Visitors have reached me from your website. I write to you but because your not the facts relevant statements about me will not let go unchallenged.

In this I refer both to the your published articles, as well as the article on the website " erstaunlich.at "that I see in your article link.

The Chosen Anat Cohen beat me up on the street in Hebron (1999)

I want to introduce myself. My name is Kawther Salam, my home is in Hebron, Palestine, and I am a professional journalist. I had to flee from now 9 years old, I fled to Austria. In 2002, a group of Israeli soldiers already 5 years had peddled on my roof. They have destroyed my house, beat me up constantly and sexually harassed (I have over 300 ads to the Israeli police introduced), used drugs, by drinking the nights, sexual intercourse gay, groped my neighbor in her own bedroom, on my neighbors before my eyes the Stairs murdered because he wanted to defend his wife, passers shot randomly and fired from just for the heck with machine guns and 40mm grenades in the neighborhood, etc.

Soldier breaks my wrist

I was a thorn in the occupation because I constantly about the crimes of the "settlers", reported the extremists American colonists plant oneself in my home, and the soldiers. The military detachment on my roof was off to me to make life impossible. Recently I was banned by the Israeli commander of the illegal and criminal occupation, Hebron, enter my hometown. I could for a while with friends, but it was only a matter of time until the minions me of the Israeli intelligence services had caught. When I was the last time contrary to the command of the israelis in Hebron, the occupiers had ransacked my house and completely destroyed.That's what I had to flee.

Soldiers peddle on my roof

The law of many countries, including Austria, which has what I experienced some very ugly name. Among other things it is called genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes, crimes against humanity, looting, state terrorism, ... and that is, while I write, and I know of no law is known that compels me, I settle for the status of a victim satisfaction and the criminals who have stolen everything yet also easy to do with my silence. As victims of genocide and expulsion, it is my right, my duty, to prosecute perpetrators and to do my possible test to come to my law and enforce for me and my people, and even for the Israeli civilians, justice and peace.

The flowers of the Israeli soldiers on my roof

My question to you: would the hypothetical scenario, a group of foreigners to any house in the 1st Vienna's pick, throw out the inhabitants of hand or equal to murder, and when asked about her right claimed that the house would have them anyway always heard (and the 1st district anyway) and this claim by using crude and brutal violence, the power of weapons, with forged documents and falsification of the history of the firstDistrict substantiated, and if these foreigners, to protect themselves against the understandable reaction of the rest of the inhabitants of Vienna entire 1st District with 5000 soldiers occupied, snipers stationed on all roads, "checkpoints" every 50 meters lined up where "just like that" women are harassed, men beaten, humiliated and murdered, and where all are extorted from an early age to collaborate when men women and children of all ages always have to expect to be abducted and raped in the Internierungsstätten usually tortured and if, in short, the first Ward would unfunktioniert to a concentration camp its rightful inhabitants, as in Hebron to protect injustice and serious criminals.

• How would your reaction to such conditions?
• Would it "terrorism" when they rebelled against occupiers and their crimes?
• Would it be "baiting" when you called for a boycott of this occupation?
• Would you sing the occupiers after each shot, each shot after shot, after every rape, ethnically cleansed after each house and street of houses loud "thank you" and lick the boots of the occupiers here?
• Is that what "SOS home" is? Because that is apparently what is required of me.

Flowers can not be described as terrible and horrible, you can not call it a flower

Amazingly, I find that I am just now going to target your criticism. I write now for 9 years on the facts of the Israeli occupation on this site, some with very harsh words, but that apparently is not the reason for your criticism. I suspect that it is something much more serious than my work for the last 9 years. I guess my big sin is to report with polite words about simple and symbolic acts of understanding between Muslim immigrants and the political establishment. As a Muslim woman who wears a headscarf, shun religious statements, which shows possible respectful of Austria and its people and customs, and positive writing about the official and infoffizielle Austria I meet hardly the clichés that make it certain groups easily, with each occasion to express hateful about Muslims. Where such shabby hate groups were when they lost their enemies come?

Joy, hugs, kisses, and masturbation of the Israeli soldiers in Hebron. They wanted to be photographed by me.

They equate me with Hitler. That is the usual nonsense that is constantly shouting from the resident of Hebron American colonists loudly at everyone and everything that fits them not - that all are not of Jewish extremists - all are "Hitler". We are Palestinians, "Hitler", the American Jews visit Hebron but not share their extremist stance is "Hitler", President Obama is "Hitler" every time he says something against their interests, MEPs are visiting Hebron "Hitler" .

Feeling the Love in Jerusalem from Joseph Dana on Vimeo .

Here everyone knows that Hitler was not a Palestinian. And everyone knows that we have to do to do with the Palestinians crimes of the Nazi regime or had. And except that the equation is honor Whip It, it's not true. Rather, it is true that we Palestinians are the last victims of the Nazi dictatorship, because in 70 years we will pay with our possessions, with our health and our lives, with our existence, for the crimes of the Nazis. Thus for 70 years set by the zionists every effort is our right to be treated as a human being to deny to our home, to cover up to prevent. Thus, for 70 years, spoke of perpetrators as victims, victims of a terrorist or "bipedal crocodiles" of crime as a defense ... If we express ourselves Palestinians are silent, we are ridiculed or denigrated and imprisoned, and if that also uses nothing we are murdered, tortured, beaten, and again we are called terrorists (and "Hitler" indicated).

Soldier who shows his ass in the world. Click on the photo. Source: CPT

They call my writings "inflammatory" and lead a "Fourth Reich" in refutation. Next, you make my reports on the iftar meeting contemptible participants call it "radical representatives of Islam," and, "erstaunlich.at" should have reported me to the constitutional protection because "Israel hostility".There are to my knowledge, is not an offense "Israel hostility", and after looking through my writings and the Austrian Criminal Code, I see no contact with § 283 or any other provision herein. I for one believe positively that you have opened this issue as to the public. The time is long overdue to make the crimes of Israel to a wider public in Austria known, and I can very much help on this subject, there are mountains of unaufgearbeiteten crimes of Israel, all documented in writing, in image or movie that wound up in the public belong.

Upper rapist. This criminals I have some unfinished business.

Where we are on the "inflammatory", my question (s) "erstaunlich.at":

- Is there a connection between " Üdmünd Sückbüer "and § 283 (incitement) of the Criminal Code? Or § 111 or § 115 of the Criminal Code ?

- Is there a connection between them, the guests of the mayor as "radical representatives of Islam" to lubricate and § 111, § § 115 283, of the Criminal Code?

- Is there a connection between your insinuation against the guests of the evening Iftar with Häupl they would a 4th Want to introduce and distribute rich Jews from Austria, and § 111, § 115, § 117, § 283 of the Criminal Code?

According to what I've seen, are precisely those people who have come from the Muslim societies to these iftar meeting those who can least call "radical", but there are those who maintain good relations with Austria and his people institutions are trying. Including many businessmen, doctors, engineers, professors, etc., which were also Austria and the use without the consent of their Austrian-Christian environment at all there would be where they are today.

I assume you further "anti-semitism". As a Palestinian, I am belonging to one Semitic people and therefore Semitic, and not vice versa. Please correct your inaccurate assertion.

They claim that I for a boycott of Israel and therefore for a boycott of "all Jews" call. This is often the same wrong. Their contention is Israel and "all Jews" equal. Israel is a political entity to which it is legitimate and legal, to call for boycotts. Israel is an occupation under which I had been living my childhood. The Jews living outside Israel are not an issue, they do me even sorry because I see how Israel harms their reputation.

Anat Cohen is a political speech

The Muslims are the problem

As a Palestinian, I know the litany and the stitches of the crew and their friends and Freunderl well: Palestinian terrorists have been when we are in the womb, we are so terrible that you can not call our name, when israelis shoot a pregnant Palestinian woman it is an occasion of joy, and the Arabs are all only Palestinians who are called differently, they are power supply and eat a lot of garlic, and the Muslims are all Islamists and they should all ship best to Guantanamo, they want to conquer Europe and hate the Christians " Takiya "means that you hide has his beliefs and intentions when Muslims do friendly they are going to prepare crime and if a Muslim commits a crime equal to all are to blame, if Muslims (Palestinians) against the atrocities of the occupiers and the from the west installed dictatorships flee their countries, then they do it anyway just about letting alimony in the West in the guise of political problems when exposed to an Arab country to be good so you have it in the Stone Age bombs as representing "the danger" The problem is Islam and Muslims in general hateful subhuman, etc., etc. ... are all proven and evidence-free lines of argument directly from the manuals of hasbara, the colonial occupiers, the Nazis.

And that's what can be found on the SOS home erstaunlich.at dripping with hatred and other sites whose authors do indeed pretend to worry about their homes because of obvious political Fehentwicklungen who do nothing but preach hatred against Muslims, and their contents as are all of a piece with the requirements of the Israeli hasbara.

She indicates that overwhelm the opponent or enemy with hate speech back on your inability to express themselves politically so that they can find belonging in more than a radicalized minority, so you have to resort to increasingly shrill tirades to communicate your point. This is called radicalization. Another permissible interpretation of your hate speech but also that it gives you and similar sites is not important rauszuholen the best possible for Austria in political Ausseinandersetzung but only about stirring up without regard for losses under the guise of patriotism, hatred of Muslims. It's called hate speech. What exactly are you seeking to achieve through their websites, which you hopefully know better than I do.

To me because of writings that move well within the bounds of legitimate and legal political manifestation notified the State Police, indicates your inability to distinguish between political expression of incitement or differ want to, that you are not in a position to positions other than your own tolerate. A rather limited view of the world.

The political opponent, in your case, "Muslims", is made with such an attitude to the enemy must be destroyed, because his very existence is its own value as a person in question. What a poor attitude, must feel how helpless someone who thinks so and acts.

Incidentally, the notion of wanting to make a political opponent Mundtot typical of extremely radicalized individuals with authoritarian personality traits. Assuming fit the social conditions, such personalities go into the later development of their condition on to make their political opponents not only Mundtot but also dead.They are widely used as a hanger, henchmen, torturers and bureaucrats of fascist regimes such as the vielbemühte Nazi dictatorship, like Israel, like the U.S. and the dictatorships in the Arab world.

I wish you all the best for the future, but above all, I wish you that you will find more time to reflect on the consequences of the on what to write, and more success in checking facts and background.

Best regards,

Kawther

PS I will post this email to you on my website as an article.

PPS Here's what you should be interested in:

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/2009/12/15/austria-genocide-charges-against-ehud-barak

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/2009/09/01/a-palestinian-child-against-israel-at-the-icc

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/2009/08/23/the-body-snatchers-of-israel

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/petitions/criminal-complaint

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/2008/03/25/letter-to-the-attorney-general-of-israel

http://www.kawther.info/ga2/v/Maslakh/

http://www.kawther.info/ga2/v/SoldierActivities/Dibi03.jpg.html

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/2008/11/27/petition-for-palestine

http://www.kawther.info/wpr/petitions/complanit-vs-dudi-cohen

___________________________________________


See related in United States:

The Justice of God: Satanism, the Occult, Espionage and Gangstalking

The Justice of God: The Justice of God: Satanism, the Occult, Espionage and Gangstalking