See this link: The 9/11 Truth
Movement - 911truth.org
Welcome
to
911Truth.org, where you can explore the facts about 9/11, learn about
the 9/11
Truth Movement and find answers to your questions about the 9/11
attacks.
Ever since the moment of the first impact at the World Trade
Center
The US administration delivered an almost
immediate verdict, which can be described as follows: Dispatched by
Osama Bin
Ladin’s network and motivated by hatred and religious fanaticism, 19
suicide
bombers hijacked four planes, crashed three of them into their targets,
and
caused the collapse of the Twin
Towers United States ;
and no one in the US
government could have possibly anticipated or prevented the attacks.
Even as the administration exploited this Official
Story (or
“Official Conspiracy Theory”) as the pretext to launch new wars long in
the
making, independent researchers began to accumulate a vast body of
evidence
suggesting a different narrative for 9/11: that of the False Flag
Operation.
The 9/11 events
and the anomalies in the official story
raised Unanswered Questions about:
the unprecedented failure of the US air defense system on the morning of the
attacks;
the AWOL military chain of command during
the actual attacks, including the inexplicable behavior of the
presidential
entourage;
the seeming impossibility
of official claims with regard
to Flight 77;
the
evidence that Flight
93 was shot down;
contradictions and dubious evidence in
the
official claims about the alleged
hijackers and masterminds, and doubts about their real identities;
signs that the alleged
hijackers enjoyed high-level protection against discovery by honest
investigators;
evidence that the alleged hijackers were financed
by
states allied with US intelligence;
suspicious and massive international financial
trades suggesting foreknowledge of
the
attacks;
widespread signs of
official foreknowledge and, in fact,
advance preparation for the 9/11 attack scenario;
the long-running links between Islamist
fundamentalist
terror cells and US covert operations, dating back to CIAsupport
for
the anti-Soviet mujahedeen and Osama
Bin Ladin himself;
and questions concerning who could have logically
expected
to derive
benefit in the aftermath of a massive attack on the United States .
The suspicions received further confirmation a few
weeks
after September 11th, with the arrival of anthrax letters
targeted
only at opposition politicians and media figures, and timed to
coincide with the introduction of the USA
PATRIOT
Act.
Already within
those first weeks, loose networks of
researchers and investigators formed via the Internet to generally
become known
as the “9/11 skeptics.” They presented substantial bodies of evidence to show
that elements within the US government must have been involved in
facilitating
or orchestrating the attacks – in other words, that 9/11 was possibly a
classic
case of “false-flag” or synthetic terrorism, such as corrupt states have
often
perpetrated on their own citizens.
What motive would people in the US government or
establishment have
to commit crimes of this magnitude? The outrage caused by September 11th
allowed the Bush administration to instantly
implement
policies its members have long supported, but which were otherwise
infeasible.
9/11 was exploited to launch an open-ended, perpetual “war on terror,”
actually
a war against any and all enemies the US government may
designate. The
case of Iraq shows
that
the target countries of this war need have nothing whatsoever to do
with
9/11.
The invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan were both
planned and prepared in advance of September 11th, with the apparent
motive of
gaining geostrategic advantage and seizing vital resources. The
architects of
the Iraq invasion within the
Bush administration had earlier been members of the Project for a New American Century.
In the PNACmanifesto of September 2000
(“Rebuilding America’s Defenses”), they admitted that the American
people would
be unwilling to pay the stiff price for US global hegemony,
full-spectrum
military dominance, and the imposition of a new order in the Middle East –
unwilling, that is, in the absence of a catalyzing event, an epochal
lesson
such as a “new Pearl Harbor.”
9/11 put the nation on a permanent war footing,
allowed the
extension of secrecy doctrines, and temporarily deified the President.
The
unprecedented public fear was stoked and exploited to allow a roll-back
of domestic rights and liberties, as
had
long been advocated by key members of the Bush administration (and their
allies
in both major parties). 9/11 allowed the designation of “enemy
combatants” in
violation of international law; preventive detention and the open use of
torture; the activation of long-standing “shadow government” plans; the
passage
of measures officially undermining constitutional government; and a
wholesale
re-definition of US
geopolitics and American society itself.
Perhaps most important of all to potential
conspirators,
trillions of dollars in spending priorities were predictably shifted
from
“butter” to “guns” in the years after September 11th, unleashing a new
wave of
growth and profiteering in the war and security industries. 9/11 became a
pretext for economic crisis management and transformation under the
cover of
war and counterterror.
From
the beginning, those who doubted the official story saw
the potential for achieving a different kind of global transformation.
By
exposing the great fraud to the public, the 9/11 dissidents hoped to
reverse
the policies adopted after September 11th; to end the wars; to reveal a
long
and sordid history of covert operations, black budgets and hidden
economics; to
wake up the American people to the reality of the globalist drive to
corporate
feudalism, which is destroying the natural environment and the lives of
the
planetary majority; and to motivate the people to act against this sea
of
troubles.
The first two
years after September 11th saw the rise of
the Families’ Movement, which kept the issue of the
“unanswered questions” alive, and which forced the creation of the
official 9/11 Commission. The Bush administration
acted
to delay, stonewall and starve all official investigations – with the
complicity of the mainstream media, who ignored the festering questions
or at
best ridiculed those who asked them.
Many signs confirmed that there was indeed a 9/11
Cover-up: outrageous conflicts of interest within official
investigating bodies, such as the appointment of Henry Kissinger and
then Philip
Zelikow to the 9/11 Commission; destruction of evidence; the
silencing
of whistleblowers; and the promotion of the very officials who were
responsible for the supposed failures of September 11th. For many, the
9/11
cover-up itself became the smoking gun pointing to wrongdoing: the
untenable
excuses of massive serial incompetence; the endless coincidences; the
insulting
fairy tale that “no one could have imagined planes as weapons”; the
omission
and suppression of any evidence contradicting the official story.
No comments:
Post a Comment