Arab disgust at Israeli assininity and ongoing pillage and murder including by Anglo American proxy
Europa & Palestine News « Europa & Middle East News: "Zionist Forces Arrest Camel in Bethlehem" - 01/26/2014 - kawther.salam
Europa & Palestine News « Europa & Middle East News: "Syria peace talks to continue on Sunday"- 01/25/2014 - kawther.salam
Europa & Palestine News « Europa & Middle East News: "Canadian Army Uses Israeli Technology in Afghanistan" - 01/20/2014 - kawther.salam
Europa & Palestine News « Europa & Middle East News: "Canada Pledges Financial Aid To West Bank" - 01/20/2014 - kawther.salam
Europa & Palestine News « Europa & Middle East News: "Syria: soaring number of executions in violation of international law – Pillay"
- 01/19/2014 - kawther.salam
Faint damning praise for Israeli intransigence
Suicidal government
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/events/1388593972
This week opened with big headlines, informing us
that if negotiations with the Palestinians collapse, the Europeans will
lay the blame on the State of Israel - specifically, on the Netanyahu
Government’s insistence upon announcing spectacular settlement
construction projects. Such assigning of blame by the EU might have
far-reaching consequences to the Israeli economy. The logical response
of a rational Israeli government should have been an intense diplomatic
effort in the capitals of Europe , in order to gain support for the
Israeli point of view.
Conversely, what was the actual reaction of the actual government
which governs Israel nowadays? Adding insult to injury, piling
provocation upon provocation, as if on purpose to conclusively convince
the Europeans that they were right in determining the identity of the
culprit. The immediate response of the Netanyahu Government to the storm
clouds in the European sky was to approve (so far, only in a
ministerial committee) a bill to annex the Jordan Valley .
In the past month, the Jordan Valley became the focus of negotiations
and debate - between Israel and the Palestinians, between Israel and the
United States, as well as among factions of Israelis. This was not by
chance, nor is it the first time. One of the main reasons for the
failure of the Camp David summit in 2000 was the demand of then Prime
Minister Ehud Barak to maintain a long term Israeli military presence in
the Jordan Valley.
Among the Israel public, the full implications of such as demand,
made in the name of "security", are not always fully understood. The
Jordan Valley constitutes in effect a huge cork, bottling in the
Palestinians and blocking their free access to the outside world.
Israeli control of the Jordan Valley means that it would be Israel which
is in control of the borders of the State of Palestine, determining
who will go and out and who will be banned, which goods may or may not
be imported and exported. It would mean that Palestine will not be a
truly independent state, but an enclave under a continued Israeli rule.
It would mean that Israeli occupation of the Palestinians will go on -
and if the occupation goes on, so will the conflict between Israelis and
the Palestinians.
According to various unofficial reports, the security plan submitted
by the Americans to the parties includes a continued Israeli military
presence in the Jordan Valley for quite a few more years - a very bitter
pill for the Palestinians to swallow. They just might agree to sign,
reluctantly and with a gnashing of teeth, an agreement specifying a long
transition period before the termination of occupation in the Jordan
Valley – provided that it is a binding agreement with a clear-cut date
by which the last Israeli soldier will depart from that region. But is
there an Israeli partner ready to make such a commitment? I rather doubt
it.
According to the same unofficial leaks, the American proposal does
not include any provision for the continued existence of Israeli
settlements in the Jordan Valley. Nor is there a reason to include such a
clause. The security arguments brought up by Netanyahu and others
certainly do not require the presence of Israeli farmers in the Jordan
Valley. Israeli settlements in the valley do maintain a flourishing
agriculture, based on intensive drilling of water which causes the
drying up of the springs which had been used for generations by the
nearby Palestinian villages. A security value to these settlements
cannot be detected even with a magnifying glass. There is one purpose
and one only to these settlements: to make a clearly visible statement
that the Jordan Valley is to remain an Israeli territory for decades and
centuries to come.
That is also the precise message conveyed by the bill which was
authored by Knesset Member Miri Regev and enthusiastically endorsed by
Gideon Saar and senior ministers of the Likud and Jewish Home parties,
at the vote in the Ministerial Committee on Legislation. The message is
loud and clear: Your attention please, Palestinians and Europeans and
Americans! If any of you still entertained any of shadow of a doubt,
please get rid of it: we have no intention whatsoever of reaching an
agreement with the Palestinians.
How would you define a government which behaves like that? The
definition which naturally comes to mind is: a suicidal government.
Adam Keller
The Hebrew version was published at http://news.walla.co.il/?w=/4996/2708367
Secular Jewish materialism praising tyrannical regimes as cover for Israeli genocide
Nothing New Under the Sun
25/01/14
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1390578868/
DURING THE last hundred years, Russia has undergone huge changes.
At the beginning, it was ruled by the Czar, in an absolute monarchy
with some democratic decorations, a “tyranny mitigated by inefficiency”.
After the downfall of the Czar, a liberal and equally inefficient
regime ruled for a few months, when it was overthrown by the Bolshevik
revolution.
The “dictatorship of the proletariat” lasted for some 73 years, which
means that three generations passed through the Soviet education
system. That should have been enough to absorb the values of
internationalism, socialism and human dignity, as taught by Karl Marx.
The Soviet system imploded in 1991, leaving few political traces
behind. After a few years of liberal anarchy under Boris Yeltsin,
Vladimir Putin took over. He has proved himself to be an able statesman,
making Russia into a world power again. He has also instituted a new
autocratic system, clamping down on democracy and human rights.
When we view these events, spanning a century, we are obliged to
conclude that after undergoing all these dramatic upheavals Russia is
politically more or less where it started. The difference between the
realm of Czar Nicholas II and President Putin I is minimal. The national
aspirations, the general outlook, the regime and the status of human
rights are more or less the same.
What does that teach us? For me it means that there is something like
a national character, which does not change easily, if at all.
Revolutions, wars, disasters come and go, and the basic character of a
people remains as it was.
LET US take another example, closer to us geographically: Turkey.
Mustafa Kemal was a fascinating person. People who met him when, as
an officer in the Ottoman army, he was serving in Palestine, described
him as an interesting character and a heavy drinker. He was born in
Thessaloniki in Greece, a town which was mostly Jewish at the time, and
took part in the revolution of the Young Turk movement, which aimed at
the renovation of the Ottoman Empire, which had become the “sick man of
Europe”.
After the Turkish defeat in World War I, Mustafa Kemal set out to
create a new Turkey. His reforms were very far-reaching. Among others,
he abolished the Ottoman Empire and the ancient Muslim Caliphate,
changed the script of the Turkish language from Arabic to Latin, pushed
religion out of politics, turned the army into “the guardian of the
(secular) republic”, forbade men and women to wear traditional dress
like the fez and the hijab. His ambition was to turn Turkey into a
modern European country.
In 1934, when the surname law was adopted, the national parliament
gave him the name "Atatürk" (Father of Turks). The people adore him to
this day. His picture hangs in all government offices. Yet now we
witness the reversal of most of his reforms.
Turkey is today ruled by a religious Islamic party, voted in by the
people. Islam is making a major comeback. After staging several coups,
the army has been pushed out of politics. The present leadership is
accused by some of neo-Ottoman policies.
Does this mean that Turkey is returning to where it was a hundred years ago?
ONE CAN cite examples from all over the world.
Some 220 years after the mother of all modern revolutions, the Great
French Revolution, the frivolous adventures of the present French
president are being compared to those of the Bourbon kings. Nothing much
has remained from the times of the austere Charles de Gaulle, neither
morally nor politically.
Italy has still not attained political stability, after the
intermezzo of the clownish Silvio Berlusconi. A much reduced Great
Britain still thinks and behaves like the empire in its heyday, striving
to get away from the Europe of the Frogs and the Wogs.
And so forth.
I LIKE to quote (again) Elias Canetti, the Nobel-prize writer claimed
by Bulgaria, England and Switzerland, not to mention the Jews.
In one of his works he claims that every nation has its own
character, like a human being. He even undertook to describe the
character of major nations by symbols: the British are like a sea
captain, the Germans are like a forest of tall, straight oaks, the Jews
are formed by the exodus from Egypt and the wandering in the desert. He
sees these characteristics as constant.
Professional historians may laugh at such dilettantism. However, I
believe that the injection of some literary insights into history is all
for the better. It deepens the understanding.
ALL THIS leads me to the Jewish-Israeli metamorphosis.
Israel was literally created by the Zionist movement. This was one of
the most revolutionary of revolutions, if not the most far-reaching of
all. It did not aspire to the change of a regime, like Mandela in South
Africa. Nor to a profound change of society, like the Communist
movements. Nor to a cultural change, like that of Atatürk. Zionism
wanted to achieve all that, and much more.
It wanted to take a dispersed religious-ethnic community, born in
ancient times, and turn it into a modern nation. To take masses of
individuals from their homelands and natural habitat and transfer them
physically to another country and another climate. To change the social
status of each of them. To cause them to adopt a new language – a dead
language that was brought to life again, a task no other people ever
succeeded in accomplishing. To do all this in a foreign country
inhabited by another people.
Of all revolutionary movements of the 20th century, Zionism was the
most successful and enduring. Communism. Fascism and dozens of others
came and went. Zionism endures.
But is Israeli society really Zionist, as it claims loudly and repeatedly?
ZIONISM WAS basically a rebellion against the Jewish existence in the
Diaspora. In the religious sphere, it was a reformation more profound
than that of Martin Luther.
All prominent Jewish Rabbis, both Hasidic as anti-Hasidic, condemned
Zionism as a heresy. The People of Israel were united by their absolute
obedience to God’s 613 commandments, not by any “national” bonds. God
had strictly forbidden any mass return to the Land of Israel, since He
had exiled the Jews for their sinful behavior. The Jewish Diaspora was
thus decreed by God and had to remain, until He changes His mind.
And here came the Zionists, mostly atheists, and wanted to bring the
Jews to the Land of Israel without God’s permission, indeed abolishing
God altogether. They built a secular society. They held abysmal contempt
for the Diaspora, especially for the Orthodox “ghetto Jews”. Their
founding father, Theodor Herzl, held that after the foundation of the
Jewish State, no one outside it would be considered a Jew anymore. Other
Zionists were not quite so radical, but certainly thought along these
lines.
When I was young, many of us went even further. We disclaimed the
idea of a Jewish State, and spoke instead of a Hebrew State, connected
only loosely with Diaspora Jewry, creating a new Hebrew civilization
closely connected with the Arab world around us. An Asian nation, not
identified with Europe and the West.
So where are we now?
ISRAEL IS re-Judaizing itself at a rapid pace. The Jewish religion is
making a huge comeback. Very soon, religious children of various
communities will be the majority in Israeli Jewish schools.
Organized Orthodox religion has made immense inroads. The official
Israeli definition of a Jew is exclusively religious. All matters of
personal status, like marriage and divorce, are ruled by the Rabbinate.
So is the menu of most restaurants. Public transport, on land and in the
air, is halted on the Shabbat. Non-Orthodox Jewish religious
denominations, like the “Reformists” and the “Conservatives”, are
practically banned.
In a scandal that is rocking Israel at the moment, revolving around a
Qabalistic rabbi, is appears that this miraculous person has amassed a
fortune of hundreds of millions of dollars by selling blessings and
amulets. He is but one of many such rabbis who are surrounded by
tycoons, cabinet ministers, senior gangsters and senior police officers.
Herzl, who promised to “keep the rabbis in their synagogues and the
professional army in their barracks” is surely turning in his grave on
Jerusalem’s Mount Herzl.
BUT THESE are still relatively superficial symptoms. I am thinking of much more profound matters.
One of the basic convictions of Diaspora Jewry was that “the whole
world is against us”. Jews have been persecuted throughout the ages in
many countries, up to the Holocaust. In the Seder ceremony on Passover
eve, which unites all the Jews around the world, the holy text says that
“in every generation they arise to annihilate us”.
The official aim of Zionism was to turn us into “a people like all
peoples”. Does a normal people believe that everybody is out to
annihilate it at all times?
It is a basic conviction of almost every Jewish Israeli that “the
whole world is against us” – which is also a jolly popular song. The US
is concluding an agreement with Iran? Europe turns against the
settlements? Russia helps Bashar al-Assad? Anti-Semites all.
International protests against our occupation of the Palestinian
territories are, of course, just another form of anti-Semitism. (The
Prime Minister of Canada, who visited Israel this week and made a
ridiculous speech in the Knesset, also proclaimed that any criticism of
Israeli policy is a form of anti-Semitism.)
Does this mean that in Israel, the self-proclaimed Jewish State, all
the old Jewish attitudes, suspicions, fears and myths are coming to the
fore again? That the revolutionary Zionist concepts are disappearing?
That nothing much has changed in the Jewish outlook?
As the French say: “The more things change, the more they stay the same.”
Or, as Ecclesiastes puts it in the Bible (1:9): “The thing that hath
been, it is that which shall be, and that which is done is that which
shall be done, and there is no new thing under the sun.”
Isis and Horus as Mary and Christ in the Merovingian Gnostic heresy.
click on picture for information and free download of complete book
