THE APOSTASY OF THE VATICAN: "BISHOP" WILLIAMSON
The Justice of God: J.R.R. Tolkien's very suspect opinions and associations
Rosecrucian Williamson is the same quicksand as Rosecrucian Tolkien and Rosecrucian C.S. Lewis
The Freemason Rosecrucian Golden Dawn Rothschild London Temple is referenced in various here. It is only one of the Seven Heads of the Beast. This is what spewed out the B'nai B'rith and ADL.
The below article by the Apostate Rosecrucian Williamson shows he is nothing but a legalistic Pharisee Freemason shill functioning only as his masters in the Apostate Vatican will have him to do in order to trap those just escaping error back into the gates of hell - the Satanic V2 Vatican's Great Apostasy. The staged infighting amongst the entire Traditionalist movement is not not only legend but most importantly "legion" as in the possession of the Gadarene swine (Mk. 5: 9 And He [Our Lord Jesus Christ] asked him: What is thy name? And he saith to him: My name is Legion, for we are many.
10 And he besought him much, that he would not drive
him away out of the country.
11 And there was there near the mountain a great herd
of swine, feeding.
12 And the spirits besought him, saying: Send us into
the swine, that we may enter into them.
AndMt. 8:31 And the devils besought him, saying: If thou cast us out hence, send us into the herd of swine.
32 And he said to them: Go. But they going out went
into the swine, and behold the whole herd ran violently down a steep place into
the sea: and they perished in the waters.
33 And they that kept them fled: and coming into the
city, told every thing, and concerning them that had been possessed by the
devils.
34 And behold the whole city went out to meet Jesus,
and when they saw him, they besought him that he would depart from their coasts.). Everything wraps back around in a predictable and sinuous serpentine fashion obviously pre-planned and orchestrated by unseen hands - totally obviously the logic of Freemasonic degrees of entrapment applied. Notice in the above example from scripture the people who been delivered from the demonic possession that was in their area and even possessed two of them. They evidently preferred the swine undrowned and grazing to Our Lord Jesus Christ in their area - they besought Him to leave for what He had done in casting out the demons. Their preference was for demon possession and grazing swine in opposition to salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ. That is most all of the Traditionalist movement: Trappings and NO substance of faith. Perfect pickings for the Novus Ordo Satanists to drag into hell forever. They will follow the possessed swine into hell while lying all the time and calling themselves holy and called out. St. Peter put it this way:2 Peter 2:
17 These are fountains without water, and clouds tossed with whirlwinds,
to whom the mist of darkness is reserved.
18 For, speaking proud words of vanity, they allure by
the desires of fleshly riotousness, those who for a little while escape, such
as converse in error:
19 Promising them liberty, whereas they themselves are
the slaves of corruption. For by whom a man is overcome, of the same also he is
the slave.
20 For if, flying from the pollutions of the world,
through the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they be again
entangled in them and overcome: their latter state is become unto them worse
than the former.
21 For it had been better for them not to have known
the way of justice, than after they have known it, to turn back from that holy
commandment which was delivered to them.
22 For, that of the true proverb has happened to them:
The dog is returned to his vomit: and, The sow that was washed, to her
wallowing in the mire.
Bishop Williamson's Eleison Comments Homepage
http://www.dinoscopus.org/
http://www.dinoscopus.org/#thisweek
This weeks Eleison Comments:
Number CCCVII (307)
1 June 2013
AUTHORITY CRIPPLED
A number of good souls wish that a Congregation were founded to replace the Society of St Pius X. But while I share their fear that the SSPX is presently well on its way to disabling its formerly glorious defence of Catholic Faith and life, and while I therefore sympathize with their desire to see another Congregation like it to take its place, I do not believe that that is possible, and I think it is worth explaining why.
When in 1970 Archbishop Lefebvre wrote the charter of principles in line with which the future SSPX would be founded and would function, namely its Statutes, it was for him of great importance to obtain the official approval of them by the bishop of the Catholic diocese in which the original house of the SSPX was situated. As far as he was concerned, obtaining or not obtaining that approval meant all the difference between founding a Congregation of the Catholic Church and launching a private association of his own. He had every interest in founding a Catholic Congregation, far less interest in launching a private institution.
In fact when he went to see Bishop Charrière of the Diocese of Geneva, Lausanne and Fribourg to obtain that approval, he was not hopeful. The Conciliar Revolution was by then well under way, and it was directly contrary to what the Statutes projected. Providentially however, Bishop Charrière gave his approval, perhaps because he knew he was to retire soon afterwards. In any case the Archbishop returned exultant to Écône, and one report even tells of him waving the Statutes triumphantly in the air.
What that meant to him was that from then on, as far as he was concerned, he had the Church’s authority to build a Congregation of the Church, and while a few years later Rome might attempt to take back that authorisation, the attempt was so intrinsically unjust according to Church law that the Archbishop never hesitated to continue exercising inside the SSPX all the authority of a classic Superior of a Congregation. That classic Catholic authority has such power that by harnessing it to lies the Conciliar Popes have been able virtually to destroy the Universal Church, and by its being harnessed to a practical agreement with Conciliar Rome it is now virtually destroying the SSPX. On the other hand, as for authority over priests, nuns and laity outside the SSPX, Archbishop Lefebvre never arrogated to himself any other than that of a father, adviser and friend.
But the days of a Bishop Charrière are long since gone. How many sane bishops are there left in the mainstream Church ? And how could any of them today approve of Traditional and anti-Conciliar Statutes ? It is as though, just after the Archbishop got out of the Catholic castle with the Catholic Statutes in his hand, the Conciliar portcullis crashed down behind him. “They are mentally sick, but they have the authority,” as one of the four SSPX theologians said about the Roman theologians after the Doctrinal Discussions of 2009-2011. The SSPX is surely the last in line of the classic Congregations to be founded, at least until after the Chastisement. And it has not lasted long.
That is why, in my opinion, “What cannot be cured must be endured.” And that is why, right now, I envisage being little more than father, adviser and friend for any souls calling for a bishop’s leadership and support. Even that is task enough. May God be with us all.
Kyrie eleison.
© 2011-2013 Richard N. Williamson. All Rights Reserved.
All copyrighted sources are quoted and used for comment and education in accord with the nonprofit provisions of: Title 17 U.S.C., Section 107. This site is in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C., Section 107 and is protected under "Fair Use."
No comments:
Post a Comment